Thomas Nagel Essay

662 words - 3 pages

In “Mortal Questions," Thomas Nagel attempts to show that some human experiences are completely beyond understanding. Nagel attempts to justify that even though your life has ends, the choices one makes will not influence the end result. Nagel first clarifies his position by defining a few terms. Agent, as Nagel describes it, is defined as being in control of one’s life. Nagel states that end results are influenced by a combination of factors and that it is not in the agent’s control. In this paper, I will describe Nagels reasoning for believing that one cannot control their ends and fates. Fate is the event beyond a person’s control. Then, I will provide two reasons to object that the idea that one’s actions do not influence the end results is false.
Nagel proposes that ends, or final outcomes, though they might not be under one’s control, should not be our responsibility. He supports his argument by stating that ...view middle of the document...

For example, if there are two people racing down a street and one accidentally strikes a child then people will scrutinize him for running over the child. Instead of people saying the driver tried his best to avoid the child they will say that he is a murderer. Nagel believes that moral judgement, or moral luck, is not what happens to the person but who that person is. Lastly, he states in his paper that we should not judge a person based on their life, or what they have done, but rather on their existence and personality. Nagel’s argument, however, is unpersuasive, after reviewing Nagels’ view I will prose two reason’s for resisting what Nagel would want us to believe.
In my view, all their life people work to build some sort of reputation. People build up credit so that they have credibility so that whenever they want to buy something they need they can do so without having the money for it. Having an established credit allows borrowers to trust them with their money. This is the reason I oppose Nagel’s argument that you should not be judged based on your moral luck. If something were to occur I believe that wrong doing already occurred which altered the change in the final result. For example, using the same scenario as before, the people racing the cars were already doing something wrong. That wrongdoing led to the child being ran over. If they were not racing than the child would have never been ran over.
Ultimately, we are still inquired about the outcome when it still is out of our responsibility.
Although Thomas Nagel’s argument was well structured, I found it to be inconsistent. A second objection is that most things happen for a reason and I believe that people do have control over most things in your life. For example, if one eat’s unhealthy food then that leads to numerous health problems and issues. Resulting from the choice the individual took to eat unhealthy cause them to have a fatal heart attack, therefore I believe that final results are controlled by the agent. For these two reasons we should be hesitant to accept Nagel’s views.

Find Another Essay On Thomas Nagel

The absurdity of life Essay

657 words - 3 pages to find something that gives us meaning. We are all suffering from this unattainable goal to find a meaningful life. Albert Camus and Thomas Nagel agree with the fact that life is absurd but disagree on the right approach to life after realizing that life is without meaning. To say human existence is absurd is to say human beings have a tendency to seek value and meaning in life but are not able to find any. According to Camus, we want to find

Philosophy of the Mind Essay

1699 words - 7 pages is it like to be a bat?” by Thomas Nagel. Nagel could agree with the aforementioned assumptions against physicalism. Nagel is not a physicalist based on the fact that he does not believe that ‘an internal understanding of mental concepts shows in identifying an underlying essence that is neither physical, nor functional, nor mental.’ Although it requires all three of the aforementioned structures in which the mind “appears” to one, this

Absurdity: The Myth of Sisyphus

1676 words - 7 pages . Camus believes that once we have cognizance of the reality of life a conflict arises. This conflict is a clash between reality and our aspiration. As humans we long for clarity and meaning, however we are faced with reality, the total absence of meaning, and this is when absurdity arises. Thomas Nagel assertions in his essay The Absurd partially corelates with Camus' belief that absurdity arises when there is a clash between need and reality

Responsibility: are we really responsible for our actions?

1592 words - 6 pages Have you ever wondered if the decision that you have just made was the best possible decision for you to make? An agent's relationship between responsibility and his decisions in life are affected by the alternative choices that were not taken as well as the choices that were made. Thomas Nagel believes that an agent's autonomy is always being threatened by the possibility of a viewpoint that is more objective than his own. His view on

The Outcome of Outcome Based Luck

1523 words - 7 pages luck does not exist is to assert that the will has greater power. But the practical and logical examples provided against this argument (and throughout this paper) often overrule any assertion of the power of individual will. Thus, it argues, if we are merely responsible for our outcomes and our outcomes are dictated by external factors – can we ever be responsible for anything? Thomas Nagel believes that there are four different types of moral


895 words - 4 pages , humans question and are intrigued most with the questions that cannot be answered. Humans can step outside of themselves to ask questions and analyze their life. Part of this process is wondering why humans are here and what is the purpose of this all. Although people know there is a purpose for humans to be here, the exact purpose is unknown. Because of this, questioning the meaning of life will inevitably come up. In Absurd by Thomas Nagel, he

Possibilities and Pitfalls

1652 words - 7 pages /understand one another even with different connotations. Being expertises of language, both Thomas Nagel and Leslie Savan believe that language has an element of connection within it that allows for different people to relate/connect with one another regardless of their primary connotations due to their previous experiences. To start off, Thomas Nagel was an American philosopher. His main interests consisted of topics regarding philosophy of the mind

Consciousness: Our Portal to Fulfillment

1195 words - 5 pages argument that introspective consciousness is aligned with consciousness of self and feels that "unless mental activity is monitored by introspective consciousness, it is unlikely it will be remembered" (Armstrong, 1980). Anti-functionalists like Thomas Nagel argue that the "subjective character of experience” associated with consciousness can't be fully measured by physical description and that brain states are not equal to conscious states

Receiving the Medal of Honor

813 words - 4 pages situation has an element of luck and different variables that are out of our control. The criterion for the Medal of Honor qualifies this soldier for the Medal. It is clear this soldier elicited extreme bravery. It is his act of bravery that should be judged, not the fact that he was “lucky” the grenade was a mango; therefore he should not receive the Medal. Thomas Nagel—an American philosopher—defines moral luck as "where a significant


797 words - 4 pages Masturbation is such a simple concept, yet the controversy over the topic is discussed freely amongst many philosophers. Although the word itself has many definitions Alan Soble, Alan Goldman, Robert Solomon, and Thomas Nagel all have their own takes of the matter. Finally, in this essay, I will highlight the philosophical opinion of masturbation and the negative connotation it also possesses. Alan Soble defines masturbation as a person who

A defence of cartesian dualism from the attacks of modern science

1321 words - 5 pages purple elephant. Mind is what neurologists have not yet found inside our brain and it is what Descartes thought of as a separate substance from the rest of the body.Dualism is a functional way of looking at brain activities Thomas Nagel is confused by the apparent existence of more than one mind in split brain patients. It is commonly know that, "The left cerebral hemisphere is associated with the right side of the body and the right

Similar Essays

Concerning Thomas Nagel And Permanent Death

924 words - 4 pages In Thomas Nagel’s work, Death, he argued that death is bad. In this essay, I will present Nagel’s thesis and explain how Nagel believes that death is harmful. Then I will address the three objections and rebuttals provided in his paper. Finally, I will evaluate Nagel’s response to the asymmetry objection. In the beginning of Death, Nagel presented the question of whether it is a bad thing to die. He furnished two positions on the subject. The

Thomas Nagel´S Theories On Death Essay

701 words - 3 pages life brings such as feeling, emotion, and perception among other things. Thomas Nagel raised three problems with this irrational fear of death: 1- Something may only be evil or bad if someone is there to be displeased by it and in turn think it so. How can death, or the deprivation of life, be considered a bad thing unless there is someone present to object to that deprivation? There must be a person who is actively displeased with the deprivation

Malaria And The Problem Of Global Justice By Thomas Nagel

3025 words - 12 pages Topic C – Malaria In “The Problem of Global Justice”, author Thomas Nagel establishes that there are various moral responsibilities nations within the international community have toward one another. He does this by claiming “the duties governing relations among peoples include not only nonaggression and fidelity to treaties, but also some developmental assistance to ‘peoples living under unfavorable conditions that prevent their having a just

Nagel's Bat Essay

1005 words - 4 pages JamilJamil 5Saif JamilDr. Ben GrazziniPHIL 2200-90121 April 2014Analysis of Nagel's BatSubjectivity of a living thing is a complex idea and entirely based on personal feelings or opinions. Everyone has their own subjective ideas, beliefs, and thoughts that makes them unique. Subjective viewing is described by having one's own personal and dogmatic views about an event or an object. This is the premise that Thomas Nagel used to base his famous