This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Thrasymachus’ View Of Justice And Socrates’ Re

1103 words - 4 pages

One of the greatest literary minds of all time, William Shakespeare, gave these words to one of his characters, ?To be? Or not to be? That is the Question.? At each step a similar crossroad arises where one must choose a path or means to an end. Plato?s Republic tackles a similar question where Socrates must prove that ?to be just? is a more desirable and advantageous means to an end (which in this case is total life). In order to accomplish such an arduous task Socrates must disprove Thrasymachus definition of justice. In Book I Thrasymachus states that, ?Justice is the advantage of the stronger? (338c). He explicates this statement by pointing out that in all forms of government, whether it is a democracy, tyranny, or aristocracy, the leader is the cornerstone and landmark of the state. With this authority and power comes the ability to enact legislation that has a vested personal interest. Thus, by creating the law the ruler determines what is just and what is lawless or unjust.Socrates refutation of this statement comes in several parts. He initially points out that rulers can and do make mistakes; and these mistakes are naturally to the disadvantage of the ruler. However, members of the state, in order to be just, must abide by this law so that they may remain just. Therefore, it is just to do what is disadvantageous for the rulers, and perhaps advantageous for the weaker. Thrasymachus simply points out that, ?a ruler never makes errors and unerringly decrees what is best for himself? (341) because a craftsman is never judged in reference to his errors. Furthermore, Thrasymachus declares that to act justly is to secure good things for others, and to act unjustly is to secure one?s own interest (343e).Socrates invalidates these statements by a means of deductive reasoning. He first points out that the function of each object or person is what it alone does best. If something has a function, it has a corresponding excellence by which it performs its functions. Further, the function of the human soul is to live, and just is the excellence of the human soul. Thus, the just soul lives well which implies a degree of happiness (346-352). He concludes the conversation pointing out ?just people are cleverer and more capable? in society while unjust ones aren?t even ?able to act together? (352c).Great comedic mind and satirist, George Carlen, once stated, ?If you can?t be ?em, kill ?em!? Socrates seems to analyze justice and the advantages of being just in a similar ?black and white? manner. However, the truth is, due to the subjective and perceptual nature of justice, its definition is not ?black and white,? but instead, has many shades of gray. Throughout the debate on the definition of justice Thrasymachus concedes to too many of Socrates assertions without questioning their validity or application to justice. Initially when Socrates claims that a ruler may make an error in judgement and enact a policy that would contradict his personal interest,...

Find Another Essay On Thrasymachus’ View Of Justice And Socrates’ Re

Plato's view of Justice in The Republic

2931 words - 12 pages wreak havoc (injustice). This demonstrates that Cephalus's popular description of justice is weak and potentially unjust!Later in book 1, When Socrates criticizes Polemarchus' idea that man should spite his enemies, Thrasymachus puts his view forward; 'Since the established rule is surely stronger, anyone who reasons correctly will conclude that the just is the same everywhere, namely the advantage of the stronger' . Using this idea Thrasymachus has

The Dilemma in Defining Good Judgement, and Justice, in Socrates' Definition for Justice

701 words - 3 pages In book four of Plato's “The Republic” Socrates defines justice in the individual as analogous to justice in the state. I will explain Socrates' definition of justice in the individual, and then show that Socrates cannot certify that his definition of justice is correct, without asking further questions about justice. I will argue that if we act according to this definition of justice, then we do not know when we are acting just. Since neither

Historical Re-Interpretations: Writing/Re-Writing of Ethnography and Historiography

2956 words - 12 pages necessarily opposed in their tasks, or whether they offer mutual support is a major crisis point of understanding point for re-writing and historicism. Traditionally, the aptness of literary skills to the evocation or re-creation of the past has helped to distinguish historical explanations from scientific ones, for which fictional assistance is usually thought to be a disadvantage. And the philosophical legitimacy of poetic and other literary practices

Thomas Hobbes Biography And View On Justice

1420 words - 6 pages have established a central power, the sovereignty. When, threatened by a conqueror, they covenant for protection by promising obedience. These are equally legitimate ways of establishing sovereignty, and their underlying motivation is the same, namely fear. Law is set up to protect those who have consented to obey it; and to settle conflict between reasons and passions; determine what is just and unjust from the common view on moral and immoral

The Ethics of Divorce and Re-Marriage

1005 words - 4 pages ’ compassion and emphasise the family. It also writes resources and briefing packs and gets involved in public policy. My view on divorce and re-marriage is that it should be accepted fully. This is because I have seen some of the reasons for divorce and I can’t see how you would be able to stay with someone after they have committed adultery or they don’t love each other anymore. This is why divorce should be accepted and then people would want to get remarried afterwards with someone else and this should be allowed as no one would want to be alone.

Comparison of Socrates and Siddhartha Guatama Buddha

896 words - 4 pages Socrates and Siddhartha Guatama Buddha have many similarities; they both believe in the importance of justice and good, and a simpler way of life. However, they have different goals: Socrates concerns with worldly meanings and codes, he deals with truth and morals. Buddha concerns with attaining the outer-worldly through mastering the worldly. Socrates relinquishes sensual desires in hopes of spiritual rebirth after death and achieving

The Trial and Death of Socrates

1017 words - 4 pages that killed another fellow slave. Being charged with impiety, and having a priest with him that claims to know what piety is, Socrates takes the opportunity to learn from Euthyphro what piety is really about. The first definition of piety that Euthyphro answers was what he is doing now, which is prosecuting his father and seeing that justice is done and what he’s doing to his father is pious. Socrates does not take it as a definition rather than

The Trial and Death of Socrates

1656 words - 7 pages The portrayal of Socrates, through the book “the trial and death of Socrates” is one that has created a fairly controversial character in Western history. In many ways, Socrates changed the idea of common philosophy in ancient Greece; he transformed their view on philosophy from a study of why the way things are, into a consideration man. Specifically, he analyzed the virtue and health of the human soul. Along side commending Socrates for his

The trial and death of Socrates

702 words - 3 pages the people of Athens make the youth better while he alone makes them worse, which is the second inconsistence in Meletus’s case. Back to the court and my job as a juryman and defining the options of what is to be done with Socrates. As I have listened to the defense, Socrates, and the prosecution, Meletus, Anytus, Lycon, etc…, make their cases for what would be the best form of justice in this case. As I listened to Meletus talk I gained the

David's "Death of Socrates" and G

1299 words - 5 pages Jacques-Louis David was a political figure as well as an artist. He was more closely involved in the political life of his time than any other contemporary painter. During the revolution David became a Deputy and voted for the execution of Louis XVI and his work is deeply marked by this fact. In his Death of Socrates David put Neo-classicism at the service of a morality based on Greco-Roman stoicism, self-sacrifice, and stern patriotism. The

The Philosophy of Socrates and the Sophists

600 words - 3 pages Philosophers take many different approaches to understand whether something is wise or not. The distinction between the Sophists and Socrates are the different approaches to knowledge. The sophists use a persuasive method known as rhetoric, to obtain victory whereas Socrates uses a dialectic form of question and answer to attain at least some degree of truth. They both have common interest is human life, human affairs and intellectual knowledge

Similar Essays

Thrasymachus And Socrates Essay

904 words - 4 pages In Plato’s The Republic, we, the readers, are presented with two characters that have opposing views on a simple, yet elusive question: what is justice? In this paper, I will explain Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, as well as Socrates’s rebuttals and differences in opinion. In addition, I will comment on the different arguments made by both Socrates and Thrasymachus, and offer critical commentary and examples to illustrate my agreement or

Socrates And Thrasymachus In Republic Essay

2195 words - 9 pages Socrates and Thrasymachus in Republic Socrates and Thrasymachus have a dialogue in Chapter 2 of Republic which progresses from a discussion of the definition of morality, to an understanding of the expertise of ruling, and eventually to a debate on the state of human nature. The Thrasymachian view of human nature has interesting implications in regards to Thomas Nagel’s ideal of egalitarianism, and Barbara Ehrenreich’s discontentment with

Plato’s Republic: Justice And Injustice In Thrasymachus' Account

6506 words - 26 pages Plato’s Republic: Justice and Injustice in Thrasymachus' Account ABSTRACT: This paper has a two-fold task. First, I show that there are three types of individuals associated with the Thrasymachean view of society: (a) the many, i.e., the ruled or those exploited individuals who are just and obey the laws of the society; (b) the tyrant or ruler who sets down laws in the society in order to exploit the many for personal advantage; (c) the

Plato's "Trial And Death Of Socrates", Explains Socrates View Of Self Examination (Meditation) As The Path To Knowledge

897 words - 4 pages fact they did not know it. This gave Socrates an important advantage over the other men in Athens. How can someone know the truth and gain mass amounts of knowledge if that person doesn't know and have great knowledge of his or herself.Socrates analyzed everything including his own knowledge and actions. Socrates realized that wisdom can be obtained by self-examination and by speaking the philosophical language. He spoke the philosophical language