Thre Views Of Social Darwinism Essay

1639 words - 7 pages

The concept of Social Darwinism was a widely accepted theory in the nineteenth-century. Various intellectual, and political figures from each side of the political spectrum grasped the theory and interpreted it in various ways. In this paper, we will discuss three different nineteenth-century thinkers and their conception of Social Darwinism. The conservative, Heinrich von Treitschke, and liberal Herbert Spencer both gave arguments on the usefulness of competition between people on a global scale. The anarchist, Peter Kropotkin, refuted the belief of constant competition among members of the same species and emphasized mutual aid.
Heinrich von Treitschke's defense of Social Darwinism was a direct result of his view on the state and nation. He believed that only brave nations could stand the test of time, and argued that nations who did not showcase their power would eventually be preyed upon and parish. Treitschke makes this clear when he states, “History wears thoroughly masculine features; it is not for sentimental natures or for women. Only brave nations have a secure existence, a future, a development; weak and cowardly nations go to the wall, and rightly so.” (Treitschke, 11). He believed that competition between nations reflected the superiority of the victor.
Treitschke proclaimed that there were two main functions of the state, the second is for the state to make war and is most important for understanding his defense of Social Darwinism. He believed that only through war would a great nation succeed. In his thought, he takes the idea of competition between animals that Darwin argued, and placed them on a global scale where nations competed for superiority. Competition between nations was the only way to progress and evolve to Treitschke. He expresses this claim of great advancement that lies within warfare when he states, “The great advances of mankind in civilization can only be entirely realized in the face of the resistance of barbarism and unreason, by the sword.” (Treitschke, 22).
He gives the example of the Netherlands and how they had become a weak nation which was to be preyed upon. He argues that the Dutch were at a state to be revered when they were combating the Spanish. Treitschke believed that when they were making war against the Spaniards, the Dutch were at their highest point. Once peace had been settled and they focused on economic prosperity alone, he believes that submitted themselves to the position of prey. He elaborates on this disapproval of Dutch submission when he states, “In misfortune there lies a hardening influence for noble nations; in prosperity even they run the risk of becoming prey to the sloth. Thus the once so brave Dutchmen have turned into creditors of the state and have degenerated thereby, even physically.” (Treitschke, 20).” In Treitschke's eyes, once the Dutch gave up the martial spirit, they degenerated into a nation of weakness.
Treitschke's advocation of war...

Find Another Essay On Thre Views of Social Darwinism

Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection and Social Darwinism

790 words - 3 pages philosophers and thinkers have also adapted Darwin's evolutionary ideas, in order to apply them in a societal or cultural context. One great example of this adaptation of the biological concept of evolution, is the appearance of Social Darwinism during the 19th century. Social Darwinism, by definition, is the principle that "the survival of the fittest" applies to human ethics and politics just as it does to biological evolution. (1) The theory of

Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection and Social Darwinism

562 words - 2 pages . One of the many social Darwinists was a man named William Graham Sumner. In his lectures and writings, Sumner became one of the leading proponents of laissez-faire economics and social Darwinism, opposing all government efforts to regulate business or to combat social inequality. In his book, That it is Not Wicked to Be Rich, Sumner spoke of social classes in the United States. He argued that social existence was a competitive struggle among

Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection and Social Darwinism

2923 words - 12 pages remains one of the most influential ever written. Its influence has even extended into realms other than biology and science. An entire method of looking at and interpreting society has come into being partly from the ideas of Darwin. This methodology is known as social darwinism. One can trace the roots of this idea all the way back to the time of Darwin and his contemporaries, and proponents of the theory remain strong even

Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection and Social Darwinism - 1232 words

1232 words - 5 pages slaves. Darwin’s principle was also used by the society to formulate the idea of class system and social ranking. The idea of applying Darwin’s principle to promote caste and color discrimination within societies eventually came to be known as ‘Social Darwinism’. The high-ranked members of the society believed that, to maintain the prosperity of the society, the weak social groups should be oppressed to ensure their elimination in the

Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection, Social Darwinism and the Catholic Church

1431 words - 6 pages to pass on the favored traits and that mixing of the genes with lesser beings would endanger the survival of that race. As stated in the wikipedia article on ‘Social Darwinism, “To enlist, [in Social Darwinism], strong nations would survive […] in the struggle for dominance.” One nation that would use the idea of Social Darwinism in its favor would be Germany and the rise of The Nazi party in 1939. During the 1930’s Darwin’s theory was very

Art for Art's Sake: discusses the views of James Baldwin and Ralph Waldo Emerson Ellison regarding the role experience and social agenda do/should play in the creation of art.

635 words - 3 pages A great 20th century author once said, "our humanity is our burden" (23). It is this encumbrance, however, that shapes the literature of two of the most powerful and influential authors of this era, Ralph Ellison and James Baldwin. Though they have opposing views on the role experience and sociopolitical agenda should play in art, both writers recognize the importance of these two factors and have been very vocal on their opinions about the

Compare and contrast two social science views about the ordering of social life.

1611 words - 7 pages Without knowing it, social order is very important in everyday life. As Elizabeth Silva says ‘social order is a key principle of living together’ (Reflections on Ordered Lives, 2009, Audio). The ordering of social life can be looked at in many ways. However, two theories stand out when looking at the making of social order, that of Erving Goffman and Michel Foucault. Both of these theories are concerned with how society is produced and, more

Hobbes' views on humanity. Is this conception of humanity accurate, that is, is man a self-preserving and anti-social machine? Are humans ultimately selfish and perpetually in a state of conflict?

2561 words - 10 pages fearful of others, whether it be of what they thought or said.By now, one begins to wonder about volunteers and organ donors. Is one left to believe that they too have some selfish thought? Hobbes' states two (2) things about man, that they are selfish, which means wanting only their own good and care nothing about others, and that they are an anti-social machine. Hobbes' definition of selfishness might be a bit extreme when comparing it to

Social Darwinism, Racism, And Nazi Germany

1670 words - 7 pages -Five points are an outline of the Nazi beliefs, and they provide a basis for the occurrences that followed its introduction. The Twenty-Five points contained the racial views of the Nazis, which allowed them to justify the holocaust. These views were directly derived from Social Darwinism. Hitler began racial cleansing in an attempt to purge Germany of "inferior blood". Hitler and the Nazis set out to better Germany for the Aryan race, and would

Charles Darwin’s Influence on The Nazi Party

1258 words - 6 pages Darwin was not anywhere close to how evil Hitler was and he did not share the same murderous views, social darwinism was an ideology. It was drawn out from various elements of his thought that suggested relation between his teaching of evolution by natural selection and the way humanity functions. With this being said Hitler used Darwin's notion of the “Survival of the fittest ” (National Socialism). Charles Darwin, playing a key role in the

Social Darwinism

626 words - 3 pages Darwin. Social Darwinism states that social policy should allow the weak and unfit to fail and die, and that this is not only good policy but morally right. It is Herbert Spencer's application of Darwinian Theory to human society. It is most often used as a justification for political, economic, and social elitism. It is an argument that justifies ones relative upper status while maintaining the relatively lower status of others. The argument for

Similar Essays

The Development Of Social Darwinism Essay

2231 words - 9 pages a letter that Darwin wrote to Heinrich Fich that was not discovered till 1993. In this letter Darwin discussed some of his economic views and how his evolutionary theory relates to economics. This letter is a strong piece of evidence that Darwin himself believed that his theory lent support to individualist economic competition and laissez-faire economics that for m part of the foundation of Social Darwinism (Weikart, 1995). This letter helps

Social Darwinism, The Gospel Of Wealth, And The Gilded Age

709 words - 3 pages Social Darwinism and The Gospel of Wealth were two late 19th century ideas that helped shape America’s views on social, economic, and political issues. The former applied the theory of natural selection to sociology and politics while the latter outlined a way for the country’s newly minted rich to redistribute their surplus wealth to the needy. Both concepts offer insight into the 1877-1900 period in American history known as the Gilded Age

The Role Of Social Darwinism In European Imperialism

749 words - 3 pages Social Darwinism fueled imperialism by making imperialistic nations believe that their imperialistic ventures were a natural turn of events and not a cruel, opressionistic system of government. These imperialistic nations exploited other nations and cultures and their troops’ motivation was the glory of the nation and the eradication of the weaker races on earth. These soldiers believed in Social Darwinism. Also, nations were able to become

Darwin’s Theory Of Natural Selection, Social Darwinism And Hitler

2135 words - 9 pages Social Darwinism was one of the most powerful movements in the nineteenth century Germany, believes professor Jerry Bergman. As the movement escalated, Jews became non-human to the Germans. That was one of the reasons the Nazis did not feel any remorse at the time, because they had deprived the Jews of every piece of humanity that they obtained. Social Darwinism was first brought up by British philosopher and sociologist, Herbert Spencer. Social