Thw Wto, Free Trade And Globalization.

907 words - 4 pages

Every one of us probably seen reports or heard something about demonstrations against globalization when international organizations like the WTO meet. One example was the G8 meeting in July 2001. We have to ask us the question why there are some people who protest against globalization and also against the free trade the WTO stands for.The main complaint and concern of these groups is unfairness. They say free trade is unfair, the low wages are unfair, the poor working conditions of foreign workers, the environmental standards in less developed countries, the high profits of multinational corporations, the inequality in incomes around the world, everything is unfair. If these reproofs are true it would mean that also free trade and globalization is unfair.However the people of international institutions and multinational corporations who are in favor of free trade and globalization also use the term fairness in their arguments.If a multinational company pays low wages in less developed countries, they can claim that the wages are still fairly set because they are above the legal minimum wage standards and that the workers would not get a better opportunity in a company of their country or their government.The WTO and other international organizations consider free trade even as a help because it will promote economic growth, which in turn will raise the living standards throughout the whole world and reduce also the income inequality in the future.They suggest that globalization can promote better outcomes for many people what makes the free trade fair.Both sides, either supporting or depreciating free trade predicate that what they think and support is fair. Of course everyone is in favor of fair trade, nobody could ever proclaim the opposite. But how can supporters of two opposed policies both be in favor of fairness. The truth has to be somewhere in the middle.In my opinion there are certainly some or even many aspects of free trade which are unfair. Those who support the free trade are certainly the international corporations and the rich.Due to free trade the wealthy companies can force some small companies down. If they sell their products at a price that is less than it's cost of production and this way undercuts the competition for a sufficient length of time, the competition will be forced out of the business, because everybody would demand the product with the same quality but lower price. When there is no competition anymore they can raise their prices again and be able to recoup their losses. That's of course unfair for the smaller companies, which are not able to use this...

Find Another Essay On Thw WTO, Free Trade and Globalization.

Imperialism and Free Trade Essay

2094 words - 8 pages Imperialism and Free Trade Like many terms used with the study of empire, the term Imperialism is considerably loaded, with many negative connotations. Modern political understanding of the word often suggests an illegitimate desire to extend one’s power or authority for reasons of self-advantage, be it national or individual. The British Empire is often considered to be imperialistic, largely due to its heavy

Australia and Free trade Essay

2571 words - 10 pages 1980's, and the negotiation of free trade agreements (FTAs), or more precisely, preferential trade agreements (PTAs). FTAs are multilateral in nature, encompassing majority of global nations. Such agreements are mediated through the World Trade Organization and negotiated at the Doha round. Current negotiations have been broken down since 2008, when constituents were unable to reach a compromise on agricultural trade-barriers. PTAs are distinct

China and the WTO: Changing China, Changing World Trade

671 words - 3 pages impacts of the September 11 attacks in America, the authors focus on the contribution of the WTO to the continued viability of globalization. On this point at his book launch in Beijing, the incoming director-general said that at Doha, Qatar, the WTO succeeded in three areas: the members avoided a Seattle breakdown, set the basis for the new trade round, and reasserted an economic priority for the global political and military coalition against terrorism. For such statements and more, this book will merit wide attention.

The Pros and Cons of Free Trade

1107 words - 4 pages Free Trade is the ability to trade goods and services without barriers, and for prices to rise naturally through supply and demand. In theory, Free Trade was a way to break down the barriers between countries, banishing taxes and allowing prices to be naturally set through supply and demand. According to the World Trade Organization, this gives the poor countries the opportunity to specialize in the production of goods that derive from their

Pros and Cons of Free Trade

1481 words - 6 pages Geography: Pros and Cons of Free Trade Few can contend that the world is more interconnected and interrelated more than ever. This web of interdependency is primarily made possible by trade, and in the twenty-first century, a large and significant portion of trade is conducted on a global scale. Furthermore, while the majority of people agree that free trade can benefit both parties in terms of economic development and an increase in overall

Environmental Protection and Free Trade Coexisting

2721 words - 11 pages Environmental Protection and Free Trade Coexisting An important issue in the international relations of the twentieth century involves whether or not free trade and environmental protection can coexist. The goal of a free trade economy is to increase the global economy, while environmental protectors try to find ways of reversing some of the negative effects that humans have inflicted upon the earth. Because of the increasing popularity

Protectionism and Free Trade in America

2094 words - 8 pages The argument regarding protectionism and free trade in America can be traced back to our Founding Fathers. The first significant legislation passed by the First congress in 1789 and signed into law by President Washington on July Fourth was a protectionist tariff that provided for over 90 percent of the revenues to operate the new government and encouraged the building of industries and development of family farms. In contrast, Benjamin

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), World Trade Organization (WTO) and Jordan's benefits in becoming a member

1447 words - 6 pages IntroductionGATT is the only global international organization dealing with the rules of trade between nations, which is known today as The World Trade Organization (WTO). At its heart are the WTO agreements, negotiated and signed by the bulk of the world's trading nations and ratified in their parliaments. The goal is to help producers of goods and services, exporters, and importers conduct their business.The WTO basic functions:* Administering

Is free trade equally beneficial for developed and developing countries?

2417 words - 10 pages two or more countries practically signifies that those countries are bound to multilateral contracts called free trade agreement. Its principle term is eliminating all tariff and non-tariff barriers (Ravenhill 2011:483).The classic regulations of free trade system are well manifested in World Trade Organization's the two main principles which are non-discrimination among trading partners and equal treatment between imported and local goods (WTO

European Union and the North American Free Trade

3022 words - 12 pages poor economies are not allowed to use import tariffs to protect their growing industries or their farmers from floods of cheap imports. Free trade agreements also include additional rules on investment that pose a prospective threat to poor people’s access to public services. This clearly states that even though poor countries have the advantage of strength in numbers as compared to the rich economies and countries, the former are more likely to

Implications and Issues of the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement

3374 words - 13 pages world trade since 1948. This process of multilateral trade liberalisation is slow and difficult. All countries participate (today more than 140 countries are members of the WTO) and all areas of trade are covered so reaching agreement is difficult. In free trade agreements, liberalisation is easier. Fewer countries are involved. It is typical for parties in free trade agreements to agree to remove all barriers within finite periods. By contrast

Similar Essays

Globalization: A Free Trade Phenomenon Essay

1063 words - 4 pages globalization because it results in increased power for the international economy and lessened power of the sovereign state. The WTO is not only the receiver of political condemnation, but it is also the target of trade unionists and environmentalists. The WTO does not explicitly outline rules for human rights or the environment. Consequently, as the world becomes increasingly globalized through free trade, many are concerned about the ramifications

The Wto Role In The Australia And Us Free Trade Agreement

1925 words - 8 pages forward followed by discussion of the proposed free trade agreement between Australian and the United States of America.The World Trade Organisation (WTO) came of age in 1995 and was successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) that was established in the wake of the Second World War. The WTO was founded on the principle of decreasing trade barriers and providing all nations equal footing in trading relationships (WTO 2004). The WTO

Labor And The World Trade Organization (Wto)

3406 words - 14 pages case for free trade. For international commerce to be free, markets within countries must not be rigged to encourage exports and discourage imports. This is the fundamental principle of free trade and it is the central precept of the WTO. Labor markets are a special case, because they are not conventional free markets. Minimum-wage laws and guarantees of free collective bargaining change the wages that market forces might otherwise produce. But

Globalisation And Free Trade. Essay

2332 words - 9 pages Task 1 Comparative AdvantageThe basic model of comparative advantage is a static analysis of the production possibility frontier (PPF) curves of two countries that produce two goods. It measures the increase in output due to specialisation and trade. The model implies that free trade will benefit both countries. In the global economy, comparative advantage is dynamic and involves many countries and many products; therefore it is difficult to