This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Title: Justification For Punishing Criminals: Incapacitation

2677 words - 11 pages

This essay looks at the philosophy of punishment in the criminal justice system, arguing for incapacitation and against deterrence. It points out the strengths of incapacitation and why this philosophy serves our society better than deterrence.There has never been a general agreement as to how and why we should punish criminals among those in the field of law. The justification of punishment has also been a controversial topic among the general public for years now. Two types or justifications of punishment which have been supported and critiqued are deterrence and incapacitation. Deterrence includes both general deterrence and specific deterrence. Specific deterrence involves the individual and hopes that some form of punishment will scare that individual from committing a crime in the future. General deterrence, on the other hand, is not concerned with the future behavior of the individual. It assumes that most crimes are rational and that potential offenders will calculate the risk of being caught and sentenced to time in jail or prison. Deterrence does look like a reliable and valid justification of punishment but history has proven that it does not work for many much of our population, especially those who are career criminals. Thus, this paper will attempt to argue on the behalf of incapacitation as the best and most rational justification of punishment. Incapacitation should be considered as the universal justification of punishment because the safety of the public is at stake and keeping the offender locked up prevents further harm to society. To many people, this belief or form of punishment may seem insensitive to the individual offender but it is actually taking the public's safety and well-being into account so that they can live their lives without worrying about being taken advantage of from these criminals. Although both of these justifications of punishment are considered utilitarian, incapacitation serves the greater good for the greater number of people than does special and general deterrence.The intention or the potential end result of deterrence would seem like it would work in our society. The strengths of this philosophy of punishment are that it pertains to both the individual and society. Deterrence takes into consideration the career criminal and the stay at home mother. Obviously, this does work for a number of people. For many offenders, all they need is that one stint in jail or prison. They realize the crime they committed was wrong and they do not want to lose their rights and freedom ever again. Individual deterrence is considered utilitarian because it says that society should benefit from this philosophy from the fact each individual offender will weigh the costs and benefits to every potential deviant act they are thinking about. The individual, after losing his or her freedom for an extended period of time, will think rationally about the potential harm and consequences their actions will bring. They will be...

Find Another Essay On Title: Justification for Punishing Criminals: Incapacitation

Justification for Punishment Essay

1493 words - 6 pages Justifications for punishment and imprisonment have followed many courses over the preceding centuries. Most people have held the view that prison is an acceptable institution. The difficulty is with the justification of punishment; moral philosophers have given various arguments for it (Tomasic & Dobinson, 1979, p 17). When and why should we punish? Though easy to state, this question is difficult to answer. Numerous philosophers have

Varying Rationales and Ethical Frameworks for Punishment

2123 words - 8 pages rehabilitation. Utilitarianism is a teleological, ethical system which supports the rationales of punishment including deterrence, incapacitation and treatment (Pollock, 2010: 324). This particular system defines what is good by determining the consequences of the action. The greatest good is that which results in the greatest happiness for the greatest number (Pollock, 2010: 28). This view holds that punishing or treating the criminal offender benefits

Three Strikes Law

1794 words - 7 pages to Reed (2004), deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, and rehabilitation are the four theories of punishment in the criminal justice system (p. 502). Each state legislature is responsible for establishing policies and making decisions of which theory supports the states sentencing schematic. Deterrence is used to dissuade other potential offenders. The Three Strikes Law looks for ways to use mandatory or required increased sentences to

Both Sides of Capital Punishment

2003 words - 8 pages Both Sides of Capital Punishment Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with an intentional or criminal intent. In today's world, terrible crimes are being committed daily. Many believe that these criminals deserve one fate: death. Capital punishment, the death penalty, is the maximum sentence used in punishing people who kill another human being - and is a very controversial method of punishment. In most states, a person

Criminal Law, Criminal Careers, and the Criminal Justice System

2544 words - 10 pages others and incapacitation through custody serves that interest. (Farrington, 2003)Retribution"A crime is considered an act that not only injures the specific victim, but also harms society at large." (Davenport, 2009, p. 12) A person's harmful acts may outrage the society as a whole. This gives rise to a desire for revenge, and punishing the criminal tends to satisfy that need.Additionally, having a person punished by society provides some measure

Purpose of punishment

1375 words - 6 pages we are conditioned to expect this relief through punishment. Whilst society may offer the chance of expiration, it obviously cannot demand it as the desire for true expiration must flow from the defendant himself.The view that has gained support, whilst theories of punishment such as deterrence and rehabilitation have come under increasing attack, is that we punish criminals primarily because they deserve it. The Criminal Justice Act 1991

Correctional Facilities in The United States

2417 words - 10 pages Throughout United States correctional history, it has been heavily debated as to whether or not prisons have positive effects on inmates and society. Today, many prisons attempt to have a positive impact on the lives of the inmates, while giving society the satisfaction on punishing criminals. The correctional system achieves this goal through the use of four techniques. The four techniques used by the correctional system include

Do Prisons Rehabilitate?

1546 words - 6 pages conditions). Prisons have four major purposes, they are; retribution, incapacitation, deterrence and rehabilitation. Retribution means punishment for crimes against society. Prisons serve to deprive criminals of their freedom is a way of making them pay a debt to society for their crimes. Incapacitation refers to the removal of criminals from society so that they can no longer harm innocent people. Deterrence means the prevention of future crime, it

Gang Rehabilitation: Effective or Not?

1036 words - 5 pages criminal behavior. 3. Incapacitation—separating offenders from the community to reduce the opportunity for further commission of crime. 4. Retribution—punishing offenders to express societal disapproval of criminal behavior without specific regard to prevention of crime by the offender or among the general public. “Some jurisdictions do not use this term and instead use ‘just punishment,’” the more modern and politically acceptable term (Report to


1663 words - 7 pages its very nature, reduces the deterrence and incapacitation of criminals because criminals spend less time (if any) in jail. It is unclear how much of an effect plea bargaining has on crime rates, but the case of Alaska, where plea bargaining has been abolished statewide, can provide some preliminary answers. Also see the heliography section in this course for the site containing this information on Alaska.In Alaska, plea bargaining was abolished

Criminal Sanction

2391 words - 10 pages . Incorporating components of retribution for offenders with a notion of proper respect for the treatment of the accused or defendant, this model emphasizes the significance of punishing offenders in terms of their responsibility and the seriousness of their offense, not just through rudimentary vengeance or incapacitation, but also in response to the ‘wrongfulness’ of their act (Davies et al, 2005:27). This combines the principles of respect for

Similar Essays

Writing Assignment 1

834 words - 4 pages , 2000). The majority of both criminologists and law enforcement officers surveyed expressed that they do not believe the death penalty offers any difference in the amount of violent crimes committed (Radelet & Borg, 2000). Incapacitation is another oft-cited justification for use of the death penalty, since no murderer has ever been executed and subsequently gone on to kill again. Radelet & Borg (2000) state that, despite the fact that

The Purpose Of Punishment In A Modern Society

2454 words - 10 pages crime, meaning offenders are executed, given long prison sentences and are thus unable to commit another crime. Examples of incapacitation are if an individual steals, their fingers would be chopped off and for a rapist, his punishment would be castration. In today’s modern society incapacitation as a means of punishment takes on the form of incarceration, this has been very effective as it meant depriving the liberty of criminals, allowing

Theories Of Punishment Essay

809 words - 4 pages be, “An eye for an eye.” An example of this would be a person raping a person’s daughter, so someone who knew they daughter reacting and going after the person or maybe even their daughter and raping them. Retribution is usually not carried out by the criminal justice system but by vengeance and society taking the law into their own hands. Several people do not believe that retribution is the most effective way to go about punishing criminals due

Fgdgdf Essay

1243 words - 5 pages commonly be referred as retribution (Goertzel, 2004). The two procedures of deterrence are, general and specific. General deterrence try’s to find options to prevent crime from happening in the first place. Specific deterrence finds ways to prevent the criminals from re-offending in the future by punishing them for their previous criminal activities. Having the state impose the death penalty, helps deter individuals from committing criminal crimes