This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

To What Extent Was Bismarck Responsible For The Unification Of Germany?

1740 words - 7 pages

Under the guidance of Bismarck, the Prussian chancellor, the unification of a Kleindeutsch (small Germany) took place in 1871 after Prussia defeated France. There is often historical debate over who was responsible for the unification of Germany. Controversy is caused amongst those who believe that Bismarck was fully responsible for German unification and those who believe other factors played an equally or even more important part. The historian Pflanze is an example of someone who considers Bismarck to be solely responsible, as opposed to Bohme, who gives full credit to economic factors in unifying Germany. However, there is also a middle view, supported by historians such as Medlicott, who argue that Bismarck and other relevant factors caused unification. The aim of this essay is to firstly examine the importance of Bismarck in the unification of Germany and then to look at other factors which played a part, to eventually reach a balanced conclusion.The strong and determined leadership displayed by Bismarck played a very important part in uniting the German states. An example of this is when Bismarck illegally raised money for army reforms, boldly ignoring the opposition of the Prussian parliament who refused to vote the sum of money needed. In a speech to the parliament in 1863, he claimed that: "Whoever has the power in hand goes ahead with his views". Despite the outrage of the Prussian parliament at his arrogance, Bismarck was able to collect enough money to enable him to build up the army, which was essential in helping Germany to become united. Bismarck's forceful approach was also essential in unifying Germany. After the failure of the Frankfurt Parliament in 1848, he believed that idealism and talking were not going to result in the unification of Germany and that force had to be used. Bismarck stated that: "The great questions of the day are not decided by speeches and resolutions of majorities - that was the mistake of 1848 and 1849 - but by iron and blood". His "iron and blood" speech was important, as it tried to encourage parliament to take firm action instead of discussing issues and getting nowhere. The historian Pflanze believed that Bismarck was responsible for uniting Germany as he turned the German people over to German nationalism. He claims that Germany was unified: "only under the stimulation provided by Bismarck". This proves that Bismarck's effective and forceful leadership was important in the unification of Germany.Bismarck's previous political experience and knowledge of foreign and domestic affairs later helped him in his role of unifying Germany. He represented Prussia in the German parliament, which helped him to gain a better knowledge of German politics. Bismarck was then transferred to St. Petersburg in Russia, where he was very popular with the Russian court. A good relationship between Bismarck and the Russian Tsar was established here, which later ensured Russian neutrality in the Prussian war with Austria....

Find Another Essay On To what extent was Bismarck responsible for the unification of Germany?

To what extent was the South responsible for break of the Union?

653 words - 3 pages gave it up. However, it ended up being a two separate states, one being Kansas, and the other being Nebraska. Ultimately, South was, and is responsible for the break of Union to the utmost extent. Mainly the use of slavery is what the break of Union was about, however also is the reason that South is blamed for the secession of Union. The escalation lead to other greater aspects such as distrust, and violence. Finally, resulting in Civil War. Nonetheless, South is responsible for the break of Union to the utmost extent in an anti-slavery view.

To What Extent Was the 18th Ammendment Responsible for the Rise of Organized Crime

2115 words - 9 pages A. Plan of the Investigation To what extent did the 18th amendment lead to the rise of organized crime? The focus of this study centers on those against prohibition whom sought out alternative forms of alcohol production; thus leading to the emergence of organized crime. To determine the extent of the 18th amendment’s contribution on the rise of organized crime, this investigation will examine how the amendment’s regulations led to the

Was Bismarck The Key Figure In The Unification Of German?

1483 words - 6 pages Every country has its creators. In Germany, Otto Von Bismarck is one of them. Bismarck was a man with great diplomatic skills and admirations to achieve exactly what he desired without compromise.1 Under the guidance of Bismarck, the Prussian chancellor, the unification of a Germany took place in 1871 after Prussia defeated France. There is often historical debate over who was responsible for the unification of Germany. Controversy is

To what extent was Louis XVI responsible for the revolution in France from 1789 to 1792?

1242 words - 5 pages that led up to the French Revolution, this essay aims at evaluating the extent King Louis XVI was responsible for the event. Although he was responsible in some aspects, such as his ignorance towards the discontent of the Third Estate, King Louis cannot be held fully responsible for the French Revolution.Many long-term and short-term causes led up to the French Revolution; we will now look at some of the main ones to better understand Louis XVI

To what extent was the policy of deregulation in the energy market responsible for the California electricity crisis?

3761 words - 15 pages supply.Overall, this policy of deregulation was intended to be beneficial to the consumers of electricity in California. It aimed to increase supply and reduce the price for electricity, however the opposite happened and the prices of electricity skyrocketed combined with inadequate supply of electricity to meet the demand. Therefore, I will be investigating to what degree were the policy of deregulation and its flaws responsible for the

To what extent was the impact of the 2nd Sino-Japanese War on the GMD regime responsible for CCP’s victory?

1905 words - 8 pages To what extent was the impact of the 2nd Sino-Japanese War on the GMD regime responsible for CCP's victory?In July 7 1937, Sino-Japanese hostilities were initiated by the Marco Polo Bridge Incident and lasted 8 years until formal surrender by the Japanese in September 1945. Immediately after war, the GMD turned their attention to resisting the CCP. After four years of full scale civil war, on October 1 1949, Mao Zedong proclaimed the birth of

To What Extent was US Foreign Policy Responsible for Starting the Cold War?

2328 words - 9 pages To What Extent was US Foreign Policy Responsible for Starting the Cold War?- History Prize EssayAlthough the Cold War has no official start date, it is believed to have run from the late 1940s through to the collapse of the USSR, symbolized by the Fall of the Berlin Wall, 1951. The Cold War was considered 'cold', as it consisted of no direct action, only threats, 'proxy wars' and 'hot wars'; consisting of both the USSR, and the USA employing

'To what extent was Germany to blame for causing the Second World War?'

1061 words - 4 pages There are a number of factors which could be blamed for causing the war and in order to asses to what extent Germany was to blame, we must look at all of these. Other than Germany and Hitler, causes to the war were appeasement, the Treaty of Versailles, the failure of the failure of League of Nations, international rivalry, imperialism and also the roles of Britain and France are important when looking at the causes of the war. One other major

The unification of Germany was achieved through a policy of "Blood and Iron". How did Bismarck go about unifying the German states?

1081 words - 4 pages When Bismarck was appointed Prussian chancellor in 1862 by King Wilhelm IV, The democratic attempt of unifying Germany had failed and there was widespread sentiment among the Germans in favour of unification. There were a number of obstacles in Prussia's way of unifying Germany. Among them were foreign powers' interests in Germany, In other words, In order for Bismarck to unify Germany he had to eliminate all the other powers that posed a threat

To what extent was the Dawes Plan a turning point for Weimar Germany

1788 words - 7 pages "To what extent was the Dawes Plan a turning point for Germany, 1919-1933?" Explain your answer.The Dawes Plan of 1924 was formulated to take Weimar Germany out of hyperinflation and to return Weimar's economy to some form of stability. It helped Germany return to its pre-war state. Economically, socially and politically Germany seemed to be more stable than it was in previous and following years. However, this stable period seemed to have been

" German nationalism was responsible for German unification"

1331 words - 5 pages It is traditionally seen that Otto Von Bismarck was largely responsible for the unification of Germany and that he used a plan of war & diplomacy to fool the other European powers. But this achievement is too quickly attributed too the success of Bismarck. While Bismarck's superb diplomatic skills were a crucial factor in the unification of Germany, he would not have achieved unification without the feeling of nationalism that had already

Similar Essays

To What Extent Was Germany Responsible For The Outbreak Of War In 1914?

981 words - 4 pages eliminate the French threat before recycling the Russian threat. Belgium being neutral and allied to France and England made the situation worse than what it was for the German Empire. The use of the Schlieffen plan was not a good idea from Germany because it did make a big difference on who to blame for being responsible for the outbreak of war. It only made the German Empires position more tight.Germany can be blamed for the outbreak of war in 1914

To What Extent Was Germany Responsible For The Second World War?

2081 words - 8 pages diverging views at least agree on the fact that there were several responsible parties, the most obvious of which is Nazi Germany. As described above the war was Germany's fault to a certain extent but other countries, such as Britain, France and Russia, which are rarely mentioned as bearing any responsibility for the outbreak of World War II, played decisive roles in creating the situation that made the war inevitable.

To What Extent Was Germany Responsible For The First World War?

2175 words - 9 pages The First World War was not caused singularly by Germany and Austria-Hungary as the treaty of Versailles has set out. Germany is greatly responsible for much of the tension of the world situation in 1914, resulting from its aggressive policy of Weltpolitik, its attempts to have a superior navy, the Kaiser's personal poorly said remarks, and its attempts to break up the Triple Entente. However Germany was not solely responsible for the tension

To What Extent Was Hitler Responsible For The Outbreak Of The Second World War In 1939 ?

1716 words - 7 pages negotiated between the Allies and Germany. The Allies believing that they had won imposed on Germany their terms condensed in the Treaty of Versailles. The Treaty was established to make Germans pay for what they had done to the countries, to prevent any other attack and give independence of countries that had been occupied by the Germans. They wanted justice though Georges Clemenceau also wanted revenge and to punish severely Germany for the