To What Extent Was Charles Albert A Liberal King

760 words - 3 pages

Ffion LaveryTo what extent was Charles Albert a liberal King?It is debatable whether Charles Albert was a liberal king or not. Much of his earlier career as the ruler of Piedmont was marked by contradictions and led to a change of focus and beliefs; this therefore leaves historians questioning what his true aims were. There is evidence of Charles Albert as an absolutist and oppressive monarch, through his choice to increase the power of the church in Piedmont and his tightening of already severe censorship laws. Despite this, there is also evidence to show that he had liberal sympathies, largely shown by granting the people of the state a constitution which would survive to become the constitution of the united Italy in 1848 to 1849.It is clear that Charles Albert had an interest in the reform of Piedmont and arguably Italy as a whole. Albert became king in 1831, however no aspect of reform was introduced until after 1837. This was done through changes made to the legal system and its laws, the full Statuto of March 1848 could be seen as the most influential of changes. It condoned legal equality for all, whatever their religion, and for equal employment opportunities. This was very liberal, however the fact that it was published so late in his reign left a lot of time for a lack of interest in reform and room for oppressive rule.Charles Albert showed interest in reform as he allowed non-nobles to fill senior posts in the army and the royal advisory council. This therefore was seen to take power away from the monarchy and out in the hand of the people. Additionally, he made helpful changes in trade laws, reducing duties on important goods and signing trade treaties with other states. This can therefore be seen as a step towards the idea of unification, also showing that he was becoming increasingly influenced by nationalist and reformist views. In 1842, an agricultural society was set up which became a forum for liberal discussion. Other evidence of reform is ultimately shown when Albert grants the people of Piedmont constitution in 1848 to 1849. It is likely that he made this decision due to the rapidly changing events outside of Piedmont, and not wanting another revolution in the state, meaning...

Find Another Essay On To what extent was Charles Albert a liberal King

To what extent was World War I a total war?

1081 words - 5 pages The Great War took place during 1914 to 1918, it was a global war where the world fought the triple Alliance, which was made up of Austria-Hungary, Germany and Italy. It was one of the first times in history where every resource and weapon was used against an opposing nation. It completely fulfilled all aspects of a total war, as all civilians, both men and women, were affected by the on-going warfare. Specifically in Britain, where everybody

To what extent do you consider "King Lear" to be a Christian play?

735 words - 3 pages King Lear can be interpreted as a Christian play and there are innuendos and references in the text to hint at and support such perception. However, there are others which alter and give different understanding of the play.Lear's journey of suffering to redemption can be seen as a personal 'pilgrimage'. To what once was pride and blindness, now in his affliction he thinks of and shows concern for others, learns to feel for the 'poor naked

To what extent was the vision of Cambodia underpinned by the ideal of a class based revolution and to what extent was it based on nationalist xenophobia?

2303 words - 9 pages Cambodia on a socialist model. But to what extent was this vision of Cambodia underpinned by the ideal of a class based revolution and to what extent was it based on nationalist xenophobia? The policies of the Communist Party of Kampuchea were built on a feeling of inadequacy based on the grandeur of the Khmer ancestry and the more recent exploitation of the country by their colonial rulers. The country's elite, whether they were rich or educated

To what extent was Stalin anything more than a brutal dictator?

1116 words - 4 pages lesser extent Gorbachev) Stalin is the scape goat for what went wrong with Bolshevism. This is why he was removed from Lenin's side a few years after he died. The treatment of the people of the USSR and the furthering of the revolution would not seem to build on Stalin's as more than brutal although opinions are mixed on the success of these two issues.Again so what if Stalin was brutal? It has already been established that Stalin resisted Nazi

To what extent is Justin Trudeu a liberal? Does his policies contradict or embrace this definition? - UBC, Introduction to Politics 100 - Short Term Paper

2033 words - 9 pages Dhruvi Lakhani 95179743 POLI 100 L1E APA (Style) 1771 words Unmasking Justin Trudeau’s Neoliberal Face Using Justin Trudeau as your case study, to what extent is he ‘liberal’? Define liberalism and provide some specific examples of policies endorsed by Trudeau that might embrace or contradict this definition. On balance, does he fit your definition of ‘liberal’? In theory, Justin Trudeau can be described as a liberal because at present he is

How did Qin Shi Huangdi unify China? To what extent was his rule a brutal tyranny?

1013 words - 4 pages tyrant and a great leader. He used violence to take control of china, killed scholars and burnt books to wipe out heresy and brutality was the basis of his greatest achievements. Today, Qin Shi Huang is still well known by his brutal tyrannous style of leadership rather then his many great achievements.Ying Zheng (Qin Shi Huang) became the King of Qin at a tender age of 13 following the death of his father, Chuang Xiang, but did not assume control

To what extent was the Dawes Plan a turning point for Weimar Germany

1788 words - 7 pages "To what extent was the Dawes Plan a turning point for Germany, 1919-1933?" Explain your answer.The Dawes Plan of 1924 was formulated to take Weimar Germany out of hyperinflation and to return Weimar's economy to some form of stability. It helped Germany return to its pre-war state. Economically, socially and politically Germany seemed to be more stable than it was in previous and following years. However, this stable period seemed to have been

To what extent was Stalin's rule a disaster for the Soviet Union and its people?

915 words - 4 pages Stalin's rule was disastrous in certain aspects such as industrialisation, collectivisation, the purges and the culture and social aspects of Russia at this time, but in the course of the hardship endured by all, a new and better country was formed. Through the period of Stalin's dictatorship, it was not an ideal place to live, but his goals were substantially fulfilled for the model Russia.Industrialisation was a major enforcement that mostly

To what extent was imperialism a cause in the outbreak of World War I

1289 words - 6 pages The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand on June 28th, 1914 is often referred to as the beginning of World War I. However, it was only a catalyst. Instead, events from the late 19th century had created tensions and conflict amongst the European powers that could only be solved through war. Imperialism- the taking over of another country territorially, militarily, economically, and culturally- in the late 1800s was a significant cause of

To what extent was the dawes plan a turning point? - The Dawes plan - Essay

1379 words - 6 pages Andrés Vega Sanabria The most important reason why Hitler was able to strengthen his control over Germany during the period 1933-34 was the "Night of the Long Knives". How far do you agree with this statement? The "Night of the Long Knives" was a very significant night for Hitler and for the Nazi party. Hitler, even though he started to gain power and popularity in Germany, he also gained various enemies and opponents. But very few of those

President Franklin D. Roosevelt is commonly thought of as a liberal and President Herbert C. Hoover as a conservative. To what extent are these characterizations valid?

877 words - 4 pages Also, this essay was originally written as a DBQ essay. I tried to sift through and change things accordingly, but be sure to keep an eye out for references to documents that I may have missed.The delineations of the words "liberal" and "conservative" shifted at the start of the Great Depression. Although laissez-faire policy was thought to be liberal in the Roaring 20's, the year 1929 quickly changed America's idea of liberalism entirely. The

Similar Essays

To What Extent Was Charles Albert A Liberal King

760 words - 3 pages Ffion LaveryTo what extent was Charles Albert a liberal King?It is debatable whether Charles Albert was a liberal king or not. Much of his earlier career as the ruler of Piedmont was marked by contradictions and led to a change of focus and beliefs; this therefore leaves historians questioning what his true aims were. There is evidence of Charles Albert as an absolutist and oppressive monarch, through his choice to increase the power of the

To What Extent Was Lincoln A Mandate To Abolish Slavery?

998 words - 4 pages The South feared that their rights to slavery were in jeopardy with the election of Republican, Abraham Lincoln. However, the election of Lincoln was not a mandate for the abolition of slavery in the United States. Lincoln's primary platform while running for president was to stop the spread of slavery, not to abolish it. His Republican principles were the foundation for his disapproval of slavery. However, Lincoln realized that slavery was

To What Extent Was Jackson A Democratic President?

714 words - 3 pages hatreds, and the extent to which his political positions reflected mere personal animus and disposition which is still debated. Jackson demonized many of those who crossed him, in this case, Cherokee Indian Chief John Ross. Jackson’s presidency was a war against a number of individuals and it started the moment he was in office. Andrew Jackson’s main goal in the removal of the Native American Indians was a statement, he wanted to create a

To What Extent Was Hitler A Weak Dictator?

2191 words - 9 pages To what extent was Hitler a ‘weak dictator’? The debate as to whether Hitler was a ‘weak dictator’ or ‘Master of the Third Reich’ is one that has been contested by historians of Nazi Germany for many years and lies at the centre of the Intentionalist – Structuralist debate. On the one hand, historians such as Bullock, Bracher, Jackel and Hildebrand regard Hitler’s personality, ideology and will as the central locomotive in the Third Reich