This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

To What Extent Was Louis Xvi To Blame For The Problems In France?

779 words - 3 pages

One of the several obstacles that caused problems for Louis XVI and that wasn't in any way his own fault was his wife. He was married to one of Maria Theresa's daughters, Marie Antoinette, who came from a very wealthy family so she was very spoiled and wanted to live a life full of luxury (such as always buying herself unnecessary things), and this angered the people of France. This caused Louis XVI to be less popular mostly in the Third Estate, where everyone had to experience the unfairness of France's money distribution, and later on really suffer because of it. France was already in financial problems anyway because of the War of American Independence that they supported, so now they were not only in bankruptcy but many people were not even able to pay taxes.There is no way Louis XVI is to blame fully for all the problems there were in France, mainly because some of those problems were inherited such as the taxation. The taxation system (which included only the Third Estate paying taxes, and not clergy or nobility, so this was the same as asking for money only from the poorest people of France, who might have not even been able to pay them) was already there when Louis XVI became king, but he could have tried to make at least the nobles pay. He did ask them to at one point, but he just let it go and didn't keep insisting when they refused, which was quite obviously going to happen. This also shows how Louis was not very strong a not a good leader, because when he wanted something and didn't get it, he didn't even insist on it or use force, so he didn't have any type of a leader's spirit that could keep things under control and achieve what he wanted. Louis decided to have every village write up a "cahier" (list of grievances), which raised their hopes and made them think that the king would do something to help them and maybe even abolish feudal dues (which was one of their main complaints). Another one of Louis' weaknesses was to see things from different points of view, because his advisors consisted of nobles. This had a very bad influence on him because they would no doubt want...

Find Another Essay On To what extent was Louis XVI to blame for the problems in France?

Was Louis XIV A Good Or Bad Monarch To France?

993 words - 4 pages respect to the population of people in France. When both sides had enough losses, they ended with a treaty at Utrecht. This was a typical balance of power peace. So at the end of all his wars and fighting, Louis pretty much ended up with what he started with relating to the French borders and French influence. All this fighting was fatally flawed for Louis¡¯s reign over France. All this fighting only devastated the French both

King Louis XVI was his own enemy!

1035 words - 4 pages the king to pay for "what he had done", King Louis XVI was beheaded on the 21st January 1793 in Paris.In my opinion Louis XVI was responsible in many views for his own downfall, but in my judgment he was doomed from the beginning as the many rules of King Louis XIV (the old regime, that the people hated) were unequal, and began the anger towards royalty in France, bankruptcy was already a problem in France at the time, so Louis XVI inherited all

King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette versus France

2099 words - 9 pages without a trial. A man could be a hero of France one day and then seen as an enemy the next. This was the most dramatic and traumatic time for France. Other countries were confused on how to deal with their sudden outbursts. Most of the Revolutionaries during this time were against the monarchy because they continued to live in luxury while their people suffered. France had various social, economic, and political problems that Louis XVI was not

King Louis XVI of France and Marie Antoinette

716 words - 3 pages King Louis XVI was born in the palace of Versailles on August 24, 1754. When he was 16 years old he was arranged to marry Marie Antoinette of the Habsburg empire, her mother was Maria Theresa. The French ruling family and the Habsburg family wanted the couple to get married so the two ruling families would have a stronger relationship. In 1774 his brother passed making him the new king of France. Growing up he did not receive the proper

Was King Louis XVI partially responsible for his own down fall

1315 words - 5 pages Was King Louis XVI partially responsible for his own downfallAwkward and timid, no man appeared less like a king than Louis XVI, he was merly 20 years old when he succeeded his grandfather Louis XV and came in to the throne. No one could have seemed more out of place than he did. Louis himself realised this and often wished, even before the revolution, that he were a common man. Although he made an earnest effort to reform the government at the

To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the second world war in 1939 ?

1716 words - 7 pages negotiated between the Allies and Germany. The Allies believing that they had won imposed on Germany their terms condensed in the Treaty of Versailles. The Treaty was established to make Germans pay for what they had done to the countries, to prevent any other attack and give independence of countries that had been occupied by the Germans. They wanted justice though Georges Clemenceau also wanted revenge and to punish severely Germany for the

To what extent was Germany responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914?

981 words - 4 pages eliminate the French threat before recycling the Russian threat. Belgium being neutral and allied to France and England made the situation worse than what it was for the German Empire. The use of the Schlieffen plan was not a good idea from Germany because it did make a big difference on who to blame for being responsible for the outbreak of war. It only made the German Empires position more tight.Germany can be blamed for the outbreak of war in 1914

To what extent was the U.S. failure in Vietnam predictable

1910 words - 8 pages A. Plan of Investigation The investigation evaluates to what extent the failure of the United States in the Vietnam War was predictable. It assesses how this failure was predictable in the long and short-term and what factors were involved. The two sources used for a deeper study are from America in Vietnam, by Guenter Lewy and The army and Vietnam by Andrew F. Krepinevich Jr. Their origins, purpose, values and limitations will be discussed to

Anti-Americanism in France: Who’s to Blame?

1669 words - 7 pages colonial forces, led by George Washington, were defeated in their attempt to eradicate French forces from the Ohio River Valley. The British Prime Minister immediately called for retaliation; this news, though, was quickly leaked to the public. France was now fully aware of Britain’s plan for vengeance, and this knowledge escalated what should have been a relatively small-scale battle for territory into a full-blown war. In light of the impending

Anti-Americanism in France: Who’s to blame?

1242 words - 5 pages When the German Empire tested the French in Morocco the U.S. was quick to respond and side with the French. Yet, in contrast, during WWI when France was occupied by Germany, the U.S. declared neutrality in the war. America did not aid France until two and a half years into the war. Germany had originally intended for a swift victory over France with the use of the Schlieffen Plan, which utilized a circular path or wheel route to come behind

To what extent did the French Resistance assist in the allies liberation of France?

945 words - 4 pages The French Resistance (La Résistance française) was a collaboration of individual movements against the German occupation of France and the Vichy regime that complied with the Nazis during World War II. Starting in 1940 and ending with the liberation of France, French people from all ends of the economic and political spectrum united in different Résistance groups to perform guerilla attacks, run underground newspapers, provide intelligence to

Similar Essays

To What Extent Was Louis Xvi Responsible For The Revolution In France From 1789 To 1792?

1242 words - 5 pages that led up to the French Revolution, this essay aims at evaluating the extent King Louis XVI was responsible for the event. Although he was responsible in some aspects, such as his ignorance towards the discontent of the Third Estate, King Louis cannot be held fully responsible for the French Revolution.Many long-term and short-term causes led up to the French Revolution; we will now look at some of the main ones to better understand Louis XVI

The French Revolution To What Extent Was Louis Xvi Responsible For The Revolution In France From 1789 To 1792?

1112 words - 4 pages In 1789, France was under a revolution. It was ruled by absolute monarchy for centuries. Unfairness between Estates started to frustrate the people at the bottom of France. The French government was 4000 million livers in debt (Christopher Hibbert 1980 p.14). Besides the partial blames that Louis XVI deserved, the situation was quite out of his control. There were many other reasons that lead to this revolution and every single problem was

How Was Louis Xvi To Blame For The French Revolution

9702 words - 39 pages given France a strong indication that war with Germany could be inevitable if Germany continued to oppose French colonial expansionism.France was politically polarized; the left-wing socialists led by Jean Jaurès pushed for peace against nationalists on the right like Paul Déroulède who called for revenge against Germany. France in 1914 had never been so prosperous and influential in Europe since 1870, nor its military so

'to What Extent Was Germany To Blame For Causing The Second World War?'

1061 words - 4 pages There are a number of factors which could be blamed for causing the war and in order to asses to what extent Germany was to blame, we must look at all of these. Other than Germany and Hitler, causes to the war were appeasement, the Treaty of Versailles, the failure of the failure of League of Nations, international rivalry, imperialism and also the roles of Britain and France are important when looking at the causes of the war. One other major