This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

To What Extent Was Stalin's Rule A Disaster For The Soviet Union And Its People?

915 words - 4 pages

Stalin's rule was disastrous in certain aspects such as industrialisation, collectivisation, the purges and the culture and social aspects of Russia at this time, but in the course of the hardship endured by all, a new and better country was formed. Through the period of Stalin's dictatorship, it was not an ideal place to live, but his goals were substantially fulfilled for the model Russia.Industrialisation was a major enforcement that mostly brought about disastrous effects on Russia and its people. At this time, Russia was approximately fifty years behind the dominant powers in technology and production rates. Stalin set about rectifying this problem by introducing the Five Year Plans. There were three in total, which saw Russia grow through the world's depression. These Plans, however, did not have the people's welfare as priority, but the country's. As the people make the country, it is essential to put them first. Stalin was not concerned for the people's comfort and happiness, which contributed to their reluctance to work hard that they were forced to do regardless of their preferred choices. Industry was Stalin's main focus to aid the modernisation process. Iron, steel, oil and coal was the production which helped gain ties with other nations. This was not necessarily a good thing as the prosperity promoted Russia as an asset to neighbouring countries during the war. The defeat of the Germans in World War II resulted in Russia being seen, as one of the leading world powers was one example of the Soviet Union's success in industrialisation. Industrialisation was not a complete disaster, however, as Russia caught up many years to the principal powers. It was absolutely catastrophic concerning the people of Russia, as they had to work endlessly under atrocious conditions and great pressure from the authorities who were also being pressured by Stalin to fulfil his unreasonable requirements.Collectivisation was disastrous in the way that millions died, peasants were forced to abandon their homes and farms and that agriculture did not become as successful as Stalin would have liked, however, collectivisation was a benefit to Stalin as he gained control over the countryside and the peasants. Not one person was left unhurt from the effects of collectivisation. Civil war soon developed - the peasantry against the authorities. As a result, millions of people died from either bloody warfare or starvation. Livestock had drastically reduced as the people ate them as a last resort. In this way, Stalin's ideas were disastrous. The economy also suffered extensively from poor grain production. Politically, however, Stalin was successful as the Soviet Union controlled the people more than before. This was not ruinous for Stalin as the peasants could not control the prices of their...

Find Another Essay On To what extent was Stalin's rule a disaster for the Soviet Union and its people?

Analyse to what extent this comment reflects the move to Bolshevism/Communism in Russia from 1917. Evaluate to what extent Stalin’s rule of the Soviet Union reflected revolutionary committee power?

3225 words - 13 pages 'Almost overnight all the institutions of authority collapsed… so that the only real power in the country passed into the hands of the local revolutionary committees.' (Figes, Natasha's Dance, Penguin edition p.436) Analyse to what extent this comment reflects the move to Bolshevism/Communism in Russia from 1917. Evaluate to what extent Stalin's rule of the Soviet Union reflected revolutionary committee power?The collapse of authority in

To what extent was the South responsible for break of the Union?

653 words - 3 pages gave it up. However, it ended up being a two separate states, one being Kansas, and the other being Nebraska. Ultimately, South was, and is responsible for the break of Union to the utmost extent. Mainly the use of slavery is what the break of Union was about, however also is the reason that South is blamed for the secession of Union. The escalation lead to other greater aspects such as distrust, and violence. Finally, resulting in Civil War. Nonetheless, South is responsible for the break of Union to the utmost extent in an anti-slavery view.

The Soviet Union and the Legacy of Communist Rule

1737 words - 7 pages proliferated during Khrushchev's regime. Glasnost, then , finished what de-Stalinization had left: it opened door for a flood of expressions of deep and widespread dissent, on a massive scale that Gorbachev had not expected. He had intended glasnost to be a bridge between the discontent mass and the state, not an agent for bloodless revolution from below. Yet that was exactly the course history took: As the dark history of Soviet Union and the Communist

To What Extent Did the Soviet Union’s First Five-Year Plan Change Its Industrial Society?

2077 words - 9 pages A: Plan of Investigation This investigation examines the extent to which the changes Stalin’s First Five-Year Plan had lead to the development of a greater industrial society. After the Russian Revolution and Civil War, Stalin had hoped to continue the Soviet Union’s development by expanding its economy. To assess the degree to which the people and economy of Russia had improved as an affect of the First Five-Year Plan, the results of the plan

How did Qin Shi Huangdi unify China? To what extent was his rule a brutal tyranny?

1013 words - 4 pages influence on China.As a result of wanting a continuing anarchy rule, in 213 BC, Li Si convinced Qin Shi Huang that he should control what people read in order to stop open criticism of his government and avoid trouble in the future. He attempted to wipe out heresy by burning almost all classic works, excluding books on medicine, divination and agriculture. Tragically, this brutal act meant that much of the acquired ancient knowledge and wisdom were

How would you account for the collapse of Communist Rule in the former Soviet Union?

2056 words - 8 pages began to expose the scandals of the political system. By the summer the first opposition had formed under the name of 'Interregional Group' with its members including names such as Boris Yeltsin. By the Twenty-Eighth Party Congress in 1990 it was widely regarded by the general public, liberals and intellectuals that the CPSU was archaic and unable to control the country. For the past seven decades, the Party had been what had held the Soviet Union together, with their authority undermined the bordering republics also began to pull farther away from the Union.

To what extent were the ideals of young Australian soldiers shattered by the reality of their experiences at Gallipoli? Was anything salvaged from such a military disaster?'

933 words - 4 pages war experience were ultimately shattered, out of the military disaster and carnage that was Gallipoli, emerged a new set of qualities that would come to define the Anzac spirit and so set in motion the development of a legend.It can be said that the ideals with which the young Australian soldier went to Gallipoli were unrealistic. Ultimately, they had absolutely no idea of what they were entering themselves into. To them it was a chance for

To what extent was the home rule crisis of 1912 to 1914 caused by Ulster Unionism - Greenhead College - Essay

1263 words - 6 pages To what extent was the home rule crisis of 1912 to 1914 caused by Ulster Unionism? (25 Marks) The Irish Home Rule Crisis from 1912 to 1914 was caused when Asquith's Liberal government introduced the third home rule bill which provided for an Irish Parliament run from Dublin-Both Nationalists and Unionists along with the Liberals and Conservatives bear some blame for the crisis. The home rule crisis can be seen as being caused mainly by the

Why Stalin Was Able to Hold on to Power in the Soviet Union

1017 words - 4 pages industrialization of Russia was extremely successful in turning a backwards country into one of the super powers. His two Five Year Plans helped Russia meet some unimaginable production targets of vital material. For example production of coal went from 35.4 million tons before Stalin, to 128.0 million tons in 1937. Russia had rapidly taken over Great Britain and Germany in a very short time. Stalin's economic policies helped him stay

To what extent was the Weimar government successful in addressing its social and economic problems? - IB History HL - Essay

1857 words - 8 pages Essay: To what extent was the Weimar government successful in addressing its social and economic problems? Following the first world war, Germany was left devastated by struggle, and faced various problems. Apart from the loss of major territories, its entire colonial empire, and its prestige, the nation had lost its Kaiser’s leadership, and founded a new republican government. The Weimar Republic, as it became known, suffered problems such as

To what extent did most German people benefit from the Nazi Rule? - Anglo European School - Nawal Hajra - Essay

1625 words - 7 pages of the Hitler Youth movement. Consequently, the ultimate question is to determine whether the Nazi Rule profited all the Germans or just a section of it? If it benefitted most Germans, then what do we define as the limit of most? First of all, it is no surprising fact that unemployment was a major issue as a result of the Great Depression in 1933. There were 6 million people unemployed in Germany and he had been elected promising to give the

Similar Essays

Essay On Stalin's Regime: To What Extent Did Stalin's Rule Have A Devastating Impact On The Soviet Union And Its People?

1437 words - 6 pages Stalin's rule over the USSR from 1929 onwards saw his country and his people devastated as he forced them to industrialise, ruthlessly eliminated his opponents and lead his county to a costly victory in the Second World War. Although his leadership was brutal his ideas to industrialise were successful, if he had not drove his country to industrialise defeat in the Second World War would be certain. The purges also offered small opening for

To What Extent Was Stalin's Collectivization And Industrialization Successful For Russian Society Following World War I?

896 words - 4 pages period of terror especially during the Shakthy Trials of 1929. Furthermore, by 1941, the living standards of the Soviet population had diminished.Due to collectivization and industrialization, education amongst the peasantry and proletariats improved. According to Nove, Stalin believed that in order to build a modernized economy an educated work force was necessary for success. Stalin famously announced that, the Soviet Union was a fifty to a

To What Extent Was The Colonization Of Argentina Good For Its People?

1348 words - 5 pages defending themselves and their city than Mendoza had been. The city's port was named Santa Maria de los Buenos Aires. The life under colonial rule was not like that of most other countries, because what happened was that the Spanish claimed more and more land for themselves for agriculture and livestock until they began to mix with the indigenous people and this lead to the creation of a new race, called "mestizo". So basically, this meant that the

Stalin's Power In The Soviet Union

1558 words - 6 pages led to show trials and terror. Stalin was able to frighten the workers into producing what was needed. The building of such spectacles as the Metro and Magnitogorsk were solid examples of the success of the Soviet Union with Stalin as its leader. However, one of Stalin's policies was not that successful in comparison it was called collectivisation, a very autocratic system which Stalin used to control the peasants and to