Tok Essay: What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1507 words - 6 pages

Ever since the beginning of the Revolution of science, the western world has valued the scientific improvement over any other, placing scientific theories and leaders on the base above their equals in lower sectors of society such as leaders within the business sector or governmental leaders, which leads to the question: Why is it that the Sciences and theories are held in such as great respects? With the two different areas of knowledge what results and consequences, do these two different sciences utilize methods such as observation, empirical evidence and the scientific method, in the development of theories? These two areas of knowledge have key differences at their conclusion, which leads to their differences in their ways that they persuade others. In what why do the aspects vary? Are the truths established in the sciences unquestionably true? But importantly, what is it about theories in Human Sciences and Natural Sciences that make them Convincing?
To begin this research, there are definitions of some key terms in the title that I will explain. The principal that introduces something to be a theory in sciences is that it must be an idea/claim that is descriptive, predictable and explanatory in nature. This is built around ideas that are supported by evidence, which corresponds to logic with the current knowledge. Even more common theories in the sciences must be able to be falsified by nature. In that way, theories by definition can never be proven to be completely right and therefore stay untouched by opposing arguments. It is the nature of theories that this essay is mostly concerned with. The word “Convincing” is area of consideration where definition of the word can be concerned. A theory that can overcome opposing argument, also known as a “concerned theory” can be defined as a theory that can persuade others to believe the theory.
Scientific theories are not always completely reliable. But then again why do people think that certain theories are so definite that they have settled with the theory being true? A reason for that could be that scientific method that the scientists develop to apply their respective theories and conclusions are so reliable that we even put our confidence into it. One of the ways of knowing, Reasoning is what the theories in natural sciences mostly rely on and where the scientific methods are developed from. The method of testing observations, and having reliable and consistent results, in a process which many participate and improve based upon describing in objective matter. There are several theories that we have come across, one of them, which involves chemistry is the “collision theory”. The theory itself provides a great explanation to why chemical reactions occur and reasons for the reactions to vary for multiple reactions. Experiments that are performed by a class showed the same results, with the statement as the concentration of the reactants increased, the same it did to the rate of the...

Find Another Essay On TOK Essay: What is it About Theories in the Human Sciences and Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

This paper is about the debates between the natural sciences and the social sciences. It covers the theories of naturalism and antinaturalism.

1584 words - 6 pages reliable methods of the natural sciences in order to create a sense of relevance for social sciences. The natural sciences have for many years applied different methods in order to explain different events in the world. It is not a surprise that the social sciences would look to the natural sciences as a mentor in pursuing the study of human phenomenon. Naturalists are looking to be able to make generalizable theories and "systematize" human

Disagreement in Natural and Human sciences

1473 words - 6 pages In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences?I think that disagreement is the key to a deeper understanding in all endeavours. If we only surround ourselves with those who agree with us then we will never stretch our minds nor test our limitations. There are dissimilarities between disagreement and hostility as they don't necessarily connect with each other because hostility deals with emotions

Compare and Contrast the natural and social sciences in their philosophy and approach to research

1072 words - 5 pages , ideas and meanings constructed by the human being in a social contextual, reality. (Alan Bryman , 2008). The debate of the applicability of the natural sciences, philosophy and approach, to research by the social sciences has its roots in a traditional dispute by the positivist school of thought in contrast to the interpretivist one, that emerged as an alternative and as an opposing standing by various social researchers. It is pertinent to

Natural Sciences with Ethical Considerations

1743 words - 7 pages , they eventually will spread. These ideas can vary from one educational field to another, not restricting itself to one particular field like the natural sciences. All knowledge obtained from the arts then raises more questions, which in return makes it harder to solve and thus people will dig into more unethical ideas. The questions that I am dealing with is; do we people start being aware of what we all do and consciously change our habits because

Ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both arts and the natural sciences. Discuss.

1560 words - 6 pages classmates to disregard any profanity and see the song for what it truly is. Similarly, people should have looked past the title "The Book of Negroes" and read the book to see it for it's value.Ethical judgments are as prevalent in the arts as they are in the natural sciences. From stem cell research to animal testing, there are a plethora of examples for natural sciences. The arts are as much about entertainment as they are gaining knowledge, or maybe

Ethical Judgements Limit the Methods Available in the Production of Knowledge in Both the Arts and the Natural Sciences. Discuss.

1850 words - 7 pages We make decisions all the time whether it would be in the arts or in the natural sciences. Natural science is an area of knowledge that seeks for patterns. Meanwhile the arts is a discipline in which we express both ethical and unethical ideas that are more subjective. Both areas of knowledge are affected by the ethical judgements that people make in the production and of knowledge. Ethical judgements are related to human moral values and they

Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1744 words - 7 pages Knowledge Claim: Ethical judgments can impinge the way we both create the arts and the natural sciences. Knowledge Issue: To what extent do ethical considerations constrain the way the arts and natural sciences are created? Ethical consideration involves reasoning about the possible actions in the situation and judging which action is most ethical. A person making an ethical judgment uses reason to decide what is the best solution or decision

Through different methods of justification, we can reach conclusions in ethics that are as well supported as those provided in the natural sciences. To what extent do you agree?

932 words - 4 pages result. He does not expect that his advanced ideas will be readily taken up. His work is like that of a planter- for the future. His duty is to lay the foundation for those to come, and point the way. He lives and labours and hopes'. The natural sciences are composed of observation, experimentation and reasoning which helps us to understand new theories and discoveries, so we can further develop it in detail. Van de Lagemaat (2005) states "The

National Academy of Sciences: Human Cloning

954 words - 4 pages : "Therapeutic cloning is essentially the same as reproductive cloning, but without the final step of implantation in a woman's uterus." Human nuclear cell transfer cloning is accomplished by extracting the nucleus of an ovum and replacing it with the DNA from a somatic cell of the human being to be cloned. The genetically modified egg is then stimulated to begin embryonic growth and development. At that point--let's call it the point of "inception

Analysis of Rosenberg's "Lessons from Biology for Philosophy of the Human Sciences"

954 words - 4 pages “kinds” are a result of adaptive variation and natural selection; where improbability makes laws regarding “functional kinds” improbable. Rosenberg suggests that description and classification within biology and human sciences has the potential for creating laws. Moreover, the only law in human sciences is also the one and only law that biological “truths” are based upon: the Darwinian law of natural selection (7

Inequality- The Natural State of Human Beings Think Essay using quotes, explaining them, and responding to them; dealing with controversial issues.

649 words - 3 pages that no one owned the land and that everyone communally shared it. Europeans traveled to America in search of a new place to settle in order to form a society based on their beliefs as opposed to those of England. Europeans imposed their way of living on the Natives, although its ironic that they created the United States to promote freedom. Europeans tricked the Natives into selling them the land by selling them religion. The Europeans never had

Similar Essays

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1264 words - 5 pages language used. For the human sciences it is evident that theories and models depend on main generalizations and patterns observed by scientists. These theories are more involved with emotion, perspective and evidently rational thinking, which combined makes people understand what the theory is trying to impose. We, as knower’s, tend to question the validity of a theory and to understand both its positive and negative aspects. This is the way in which

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1483 words - 6 pages convincing than theories in the human sciences. It may be easier to justify and comprehend theories in the natural sciences simply because they are pragmatic and well known. Also, the majority of people are more familiar with the natural sciences than the human sciences. The human sciences can be more complex and perplexing when it comes to explaining them to the public because fewer people are experienced in that area. Most scientists or students with

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1039 words - 4 pages specific elements that make it up, and appeal to different categories of individuals, thus making this fact believable and convincing for certain people, and not for others. So basically, just like the distinctions between truth and false; what may be convincing for me, may not necessarily be convincing for others. When taking in consideration the knowledge issue that theories in the human sciences and natural sciences have something that makes them

What Is It About Theories In Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Make Them Convincing?

1253 words - 5 pages person might ask, what is it about the human sciences and natural sciences that makes them convincing? How do people assume something to be true although they have not seen, measured, or tested the very idea themselves? How do the sciences use theories in order to convince populations everywhere? In order to begin, I will discuss key words featured in the title. The word ‘theory’ is especially important since it can denote different meanings in