This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Tok Essay: What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1507 words - 6 pages

Ever since the beginning of the Revolution of science, the western world has valued the scientific improvement over any other, placing scientific theories and leaders on the base above their equals in lower sectors of society such as leaders within the business sector or governmental leaders, which leads to the question: Why is it that the Sciences and theories are held in such as great respects? With the two different areas of knowledge what results and consequences, do these two different sciences utilize methods such as observation, empirical evidence and the scientific method, in the development of theories? These two areas of knowledge have key differences at their conclusion, which leads to their differences in their ways that they persuade others. In what why do the aspects vary? Are the truths established in the sciences unquestionably true? But importantly, what is it about theories in Human Sciences and Natural Sciences that make them Convincing?
To begin this research, there are definitions of some key terms in the title that I will explain. The principal that introduces something to be a theory in sciences is that it must be an idea/claim that is descriptive, predictable and explanatory in nature. This is built around ideas that are supported by evidence, which corresponds to logic with the current knowledge. Even more common theories in the sciences must be able to be falsified by nature. In that way, theories by definition can never be proven to be completely right and therefore stay untouched by opposing arguments. It is the nature of theories that this essay is mostly concerned with. The word “Convincing” is area of consideration where definition of the word can be concerned. A theory that can overcome opposing argument, also known as a “concerned theory” can be defined as a theory that can persuade others to believe the theory.
Scientific theories are not always completely reliable. But then again why do people think that certain theories are so definite that they have settled with the theory being true? A reason for that could be that scientific method that the scientists develop to apply their respective theories and conclusions are so reliable that we even put our confidence into it. One of the ways of knowing, Reasoning is what the theories in natural sciences mostly rely on and where the scientific methods are developed from. The method of testing observations, and having reliable and consistent results, in a process which many participate and improve based upon describing in objective matter. There are several theories that we have come across, one of them, which involves chemistry is the “collision theory”. The theory itself provides a great explanation to why chemical reactions occur and reasons for the reactions to vary for multiple reactions. Experiments that are performed by a class showed the same results, with the statement as the concentration of the reactants increased, the same it did to the rate of the...

Find Another Essay On TOK Essay: What is it About Theories in the Human Sciences and Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

This paper is about the debates between the natural sciences and the social sciences. It covers the theories of naturalism and antinaturalism

1584 words - 6 pages reliable methods of the natural sciences in order to create a sense of relevance for social sciences. The natural sciences have for many years applied different methods in order to explain different events in the world. It is not a surprise that the social sciences would look to the natural sciences as a mentor in pursuing the study of human phenomenon. Naturalists are looking to be able to make generalizable theories and "systematize" human

Disagreement in Natural and Human sciences

1473 words - 6 pages In what ways may disagreement aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences?I think that disagreement is the key to a deeper understanding in all endeavours. If we only surround ourselves with those who agree with us then we will never stretch our minds nor test our limitations. There are dissimilarities between disagreement and hostility as they don't necessarily connect with each other because hostility deals with emotions

Ethics in the Arts and Natural Sciences

1363 words - 6 pages Ethical judgements often add complex implications to the pursuit of knowledge, regardless of the area of knowledge. In the areas of the arts and natural sciences, ethics can pertain in diverging ways. For the arts, ethics often comes into question when determining whether or not it is worthwhile to sacrifice ethics for artistic choices and messages. For the natural sciences, in contrast, ethics is often debated in the pursuit of new knowledge

History and Human Sciences

1828 words - 8 pages must also consider the counter-arguments. It is very possible that by looking at these AoKs from different perspectives, history can be used to change the future while human sciences can be used to understand the past and why humans reacted to past events the way they did. History also uses the WoKs reason and intuition when making causal connections between variables. It infers and not only finds out what occurred in the past but also tries to

Variations of Knowledge in The Arts and Natural Sciences

1541 words - 7 pages . Therefore the knowledge about a piece of art is never discarded but simply added to. Some may assume that the Natural Sciences contrast to the Arts and believe that unless something can be proved scientifically then it cannot be accepted as knowledge on any level. I have noticed an implication of this in the real world, where advertisers use the word ‘science’ as a guarantee of quality of their products. However, this argument is flawed as science

Compare and Contrast the natural and social sciences in their philosophy and approach to research

1072 words - 5 pages , ideas and meanings constructed by the human being in a social contextual, reality. (Alan Bryman , 2008). The debate of the applicability of the natural sciences, philosophy and approach, to research by the social sciences has its roots in a traditional dispute by the positivist school of thought in contrast to the interpretivist one, that emerged as an alternative and as an opposing standing by various social researchers. It is pertinent to

Natural Sciences with Ethical Considerations

1743 words - 7 pages , they eventually will spread. These ideas can vary from one educational field to another, not restricting itself to one particular field like the natural sciences. All knowledge obtained from the arts then raises more questions, which in return makes it harder to solve and thus people will dig into more unethical ideas. The questions that I am dealing with is; do we people start being aware of what we all do and consciously change our habits because

Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences

752 words - 4 pages its aesthetic value, or should morality be included as well? Another example is war documentaries. Some argue that those reports should not be broadcasted to the public, whereas others perceive the necessity to show those reports. Again it is not black and white. Examining another perspective, it is incorrect to always say that ethical judgments limit the production of knowledge in arts and natural sciences. From reading about scientific and

Ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1662 words - 7 pages virtuous intentions. The fact that the destructive effects of the agent only arose later is an example of how ethical judgements failed to predict and limit the impact of chemical research, which subsequently resulted in fatal consequences. When the three different theories of ethics are compared together, they offer varied perspectives on how projects within the arts and the natural sciences should be judged. It appears that none of the

Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1675 words - 7 pages the natural sciences it is a good thing that the ethical judgments stop the use of certain methodologies as they are inherently flawed and cause far too much bad for the little knowledge they produce. In the arts, knowledge is constantly being produced, and the only limitation on what knowledge can be produced is what knowledge the artist has to pass on. The implications for this are that by having an ethical system, humans limit the total amount

Ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences. Discuss

1318 words - 6 pages natural sciences are limited by the effects of ethics. These limitations can be the reason a new cure has not been made, or even the dissection of cadavers for research. The main problem with the limitations on natural sciences is that it restricts the research needed. This research can either create an astonishingly new cure for cancer, or even altering the length of an average human life span. There are also different ways that make one prefer the

Similar Essays

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1264 words - 5 pages language used. For the human sciences it is evident that theories and models depend on main generalizations and patterns observed by scientists. These theories are more involved with emotion, perspective and evidently rational thinking, which combined makes people understand what the theory is trying to impose. We, as knower’s, tend to question the validity of a theory and to understand both its positive and negative aspects. This is the way in which

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1483 words - 6 pages convincing than theories in the human sciences. It may be easier to justify and comprehend theories in the natural sciences simply because they are pragmatic and well known. Also, the majority of people are more familiar with the natural sciences than the human sciences. The human sciences can be more complex and perplexing when it comes to explaining them to the public because fewer people are experienced in that area. Most scientists or students with

What Is It About Theories In The Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing?

1039 words - 4 pages specific elements that make it up, and appeal to different categories of individuals, thus making this fact believable and convincing for certain people, and not for others. So basically, just like the distinctions between truth and false; what may be convincing for me, may not necessarily be convincing for others. When taking in consideration the knowledge issue that theories in the human sciences and natural sciences have something that makes them

What Is It About Theories In Human Sciences And Natural Sciences That Make Them Convincing?

1253 words - 5 pages person might ask, what is it about the human sciences and natural sciences that makes them convincing? How do people assume something to be true although they have not seen, measured, or tested the very idea themselves? How do the sciences use theories in order to convince populations everywhere? In order to begin, I will discuss key words featured in the title. The word ‘theory’ is especially important since it can denote different meanings in