This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Tort Law For Damages Practiced In Civil Law

1517 words - 7 pages

Tort Law
Tort Law has been a Civic Law practiced and used since the beginning of Law, after mankind first discovered what was right and what was wrong. It is a private or civil wrong for which damages may be removed and involves; falls at work, work vehicles, and nuisances. It’s a civil law that can be recognized for a law suit. It has a wide range of provisions and can range from negligence, purposeful, and ethics. Among the types of damages the injured party may recover are: loss of earnings capacity, pain and suffering, and reasonable medical expenses. They include both present and future expected losses (University). For example, a piece of machinery that is neglected, not maintained, can break down while a worker is using it and remove the worker’s finger. Depending on the circumstances of the company the worker can sue under the Tort Law. Negligence according to research taken from Legal Information, which contains information and definitions about Tort Law and what constitutes Tort law; is failure to exercise reasonable care. It is to behave carelessly forgetting or deciding not to do certain things whether it was meaningfully or forgetfulness. Aside from negligence doing or not doing something purposefully can also result id suing under Tort Law.
Ethics is defined in the book as principles’ that determine the morality of conduct, its motives, and its duties (Ashcroft, 2008). It also states that everyone has opinions basing what behaviors are right and what behaviors are wrong. People base these ethical judgments on personal values. “We develop our values from our religious beliefs, our experience, our cultural background, and our scientific knowledge. Because people have differing backgrounds, our judgments as to what is right and wrong vary somewhat.” When it comes to the work place, workers and managers have certain “business ethics” they need to abide by. This can be a good thing or a bad thing. It can be a good thing because maybe you have hired open minded individuals that understand these ethics. It can be a bad thing because if those ethics are not valued in the business, then they have the right to let that person go. Aside from explaining what Tort Law is all about I want to bring up a simple case involving Tort Law and discuss it to a point. The case: Summary of Garratt v. Dailey, 46 Wash. 2d 197, 279 P.2d 1091 (Wash. 1955).
Five year old Brian Dailey (D) pulled a chair out from under Ruth Garratt just as she was about to sit causing her to fall and break her hip. Garratt brought suit for personal injuries and alleged that Dailey had acted deliberately. The trial court entered judgment for Dailey and found that he had not intended to injure Garratt. The court nevertheless made a finding of $11,000 in damages in case the judgment was overturned on appeal. Dailey appealed.
1. In regards to the intentional tort of battery, is the element of intent satisfied if the defendant knows with a substantial certainty that...

Find Another Essay On Tort Law for Damages Practiced in Civil Law

General Tort Law Essay

358 words - 2 pages Tort law is, to a great extent, social engineering by the courts. As society evolves, the courts? concept of what interests we have that are worth protecting also evolves. The courts impose duties on us not to injure the protectable interests of others.The leading remedy for accidental injury in this country is the negligence cause of action. Existence of a duty and proximate causation, both of which turn largely on the notion of foreseeability

Canadian Tort Law Essay

1925 words - 8 pages / Herschorn, A. (1996). Damages for economic loss in tort: Winnipeg condominium corp. Co. 36 v. bird construction co. ltd. Advocates’ Quarterly 18, 109-112. Retrieved from Hirst, E. C. (March, 2009). Tendering Law – 2009 Update Paper 1.1. Retrieved from Ishack, M. (2014). Law and Ethics for Engineers

Tort Law Basics

832 words - 3 pages What is Tort?Tort means a wrongful act which causes an injury. It is a civil wrong done by one person to another's body, property or reputation. The wrong could be done negligently or intentionally. The victim is usually awarded damages paid by the person who committed the wrong.2. Describe 3 social purposes of law.i)To compensate the victim for loss suffered in order to place them in the same position they would have been in before the wrong

Common Law Civil Law

665 words - 3 pages CIVIL-LAW AND COMMON LAW TRADITION: ACOMPARATIVE APROACHCivil law primarily contrasted against common law. The significantdifference is that, historically, common law was developed bycustom whereas civil law was developed by legal principles and theinterpretation of doctrinal writings rather than application of facts tolegal fictions. 'Common-law is extremely decentralized in terms ofthe source of law (making place for evolving cultural changes

civil law

476 words - 2 pages ALI / UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure Ukrainian national litigation 27. Appeal 27.1 Appellate review should be available on substantially the same terms as other judgments under the law of the forum. Appellate review should be concluded expeditiously. 27.2 The scope of appellate review should ordinarily be limited to claims and defenses addressed in the first-instance proceeding. 27.3 The appellate court may in the

Tort Law: Harassment Act 1997

2149 words - 9 pages INTRODUCTION The main purpose of this Essay is to advise the parties as to any potential liability in tort and under the protection from Harassment Act 1997, also to find out the particulars of the case and list the points that are necessary in order for someone to be found guilty. In Caroline and Nicole, A minor must be responsible for his or her own torts. However the issue here is whether Nicole’s actions amounted to a battery? Battery

Pittston Coal Company: Tort Law

1230 words - 5 pages this time the plaintiffs started to opposing delays by Pittston. During this time the state chose to file a lawsuit for $100 million in damages. Stern explains about the importance of balancing between the anticipated jury settlement, the desired settlement, and the settlement the defendant would offer. In their first settlement offer Pittston offered 3 million. Stern writes why this offer would be declined, “If the jury would give you $8 million

The Purpose of Tort Law in the Irish Legal System

3219 words - 13 pages from the Latin word ‘tortum’, translated this means twisted, crooked or wrong. The term ‘tort’ was first introduced into English law by the Normans. It is widely understood to mean the law of civil liability for wrongfully inflicted injury. This is the literal translation of the word tort but it has many different meanings and purposes in the law and there are many different kinds of torts or ‘wrongs’. Over the years tort scholars have been divided

Common Law in Australia: The Tort Of Negligence

9095 words - 36 pages TORT - A Tort is a civil wrong that is outside of Contract Law and arises out of a recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others. The term "Tort" refers to a number of different laws such as nuisance, trespass and assault. Torts action generally compensates the individual for personal loss where the loss was caused by another person. It is based on Common Law.NEGLIGENCE - Negligence is one of many

Essay on tort law history, in particular looking at the British and Australian tort law development through the 19th century

1396 words - 6 pages Prior to the industrialization of America and England in the early 19th century tort law had a limited scope primarily due to a lack of diversity and lack of quantity in tort cases. However with large factories and railroads grew a complex relationship between employee, employer and consumer. Due to this it was necessary for the legal system to re examine lines of reasoning. Despite academics such as Friedman suggesting that the law became a

Natural Law and Civil Law

963 words - 4 pages Leviathan as bearer of supreme authority and nationals who posses certain inalienable rights. We should draw attention to Hobbes’ reasoning about natural law and civil or positive law. According to Hobbes they both match with scope, form and content. However, natural law, which is impartial, equitable, legitimate, and moral in natural state is not the law itself; it just disposes people to peace, mercy, and obedience. Natural law is the laws

Similar Essays

Tort Law Essay

2598 words - 10 pages manage to bring the levels of damages to a relatively more proper amount, in recent years, there is an inclination of increase in damages. It was always argued that the compensation paid for the non-pecuniary losses had fallen behind inflation and a longer life expectancy nowadays; for these reasons, it should be increased, and until the leading case of Heil v Rankin and Anothers, the House of Lords agreed with the Law Commission and held those

Tort Law Essay

1937 words - 8 pages three-fold tests are met, HKCEC owed a duty of care to the band members and audience and should be liable for their negligence. [4: [1990] 2 AC 605, 617-618][5: DK Srivastava, The Law of Tort in Hong Kong 2nd Edition, Lexis Nexis P.168][6: DK Srivastava, The Law of Tort in Hong Kong 2nd Edition, Lexis Nexis P.168]The second issue was whether the affected parties could claim damages from HKCEC. First we have to classify the victims as the primary

Tort Law Essay

10262 words - 41 pages well-being. 336 / THE JOURNAL OF L EGAL S TUD I E S / VOLUME 32 (1 ) / JANUARY 2003 Reinforcing the second point is that, in each of the situations that we examine, we present the striking argument that promoting any of the pertinent notions of fairness sometimes makes literally everyone worse off, that is, violates the Pareto principle.5 One way of demon- strating this argument focuses on symmetric cases. For example, in the tort setting

Business Law Tort Law Cases

1509 words - 6 pages the conference Jim, returns to his office in the Law Faculty and finds a student from the Campus Law Centre waiting for him to request him to deal with a client's problem. Jim has agreed to support the students' efforts to provide free legal advice at the Centre and the problem concerns a claim by a Mrs Smith on her insurance policy. Jim speaks to Mrs Smith and advises her that she cannot claim but unfortunately he has failed to note an important