Transformational & Transactional Leadership Essay

925 words - 4 pages

Over the past twenty years, an abundant body of researches have been done to review transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Burn (1978) was the first person to introduce and conceptualize the concept of transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Bass (1985) based on Burn’s concept and deepen his notion with modifications, which stated that one of the best frameworks of leadership is transformational or transactional, but not opposing to each other. Followed by Bass and Avolio (1994), they provide the idea of these two leaderships and generalize them into the development of global economic world. Bass and Avolio (1997) also suggested that there was no need to view transformational and transactional leadership as opposing ways or leaderships when we applied them into our management. Recently, researchers have begun to increase the interest of investigating the relationship between these two leaderships and seeking the influences and correlation with other features, like personality, performance and behaviour towards effectiveness (Hartnell & Walumbwa, 2011, p. 225; Rowld & Rohmann, 2009, p. 42; Bono & Judge, 2004, p. 901; Eeden, Cilliers & Deventer, 2008, p. 253). In this essay, I would like to distinguish transformational and transactional leadership and talk the possible integrations between them.

Critical discussions
The main distinction of transformational and transactional leadership is the way that how leaders relate with followers and the acquisition they receive from each other (). Transactional leadership requires exchange of resources as the leader explains the procedure to followers and expects them to successfully complete their work to fulfil their needs (Eeden et al., 2008, p. 255). This is the part of transaction which satisfies followers’ needs as well by giving contingent reward as well. Leaders are aiming to control and surveillance employees through sensible and thrifty intention (Bass, 1985). It simply requires an agreement between leaders and followers toward organization goal (Burns, 1978). In transformation leadership, leaders focus on changing followers’ moral sensibilities and potentially increasing their motivation beyond self-interest (Kezar & Eckel, 2008, p. 381). It needs more associated with outcome criteria than transactional leadership (Rowold & Rohmann, 2009, p. 42). Transformation leadership helps to build positive relationship among staff and raising their morale. In contrast, transactional leadership helps to build the fundamental structure of the organisation (Kezar & Eckel, 2008, p. 383).

Transformational leadership are clarified into four dimensions which are pointed out by Bass (1990, p. 28), ‘charisma, idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration’. Apart from these basic roles, charisma leadership has its own role of literature since it has similarity with transformational...

Find Another Essay On Transformational & Transactional Leadership

The Study of Leadership and the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire

1817 words - 7 pages approach was only after the work of the political sociologist James McGregor. In his book Leadership(1978), he attempted to link the roles of leadership and followership. He also distinguished leadership into transformational leadership and transactional leadership. According to Burns(1978), transactional leaders are those who work on the exchange principle and transforming leaders are those who engage with the followers and raise their motivation and

Leadership and complex adaptive systems Essay

1710 words - 7 pages Although current leadership theory emphasizes the distinction between transactional and transformational leadership, in fact, most leaders have a mixed profile of the full range of leadership styles. The best form of leadership is not only transformational or only transactional, but rather a combination of the two. However, in order to better understand each style's pros and cons, they have to be discussed in terms of similarities and

The Immersion of Transformational Leadership

3730 words - 15 pages leadership theory, to which he called transactional leadership, to one of a more influential and dynamic form of leadership known as transformational leadership (Johnson, 2012, p. 190). Burns suggested that the transactional leader provided only the most basic of needs, such as food, shelter, and acceptance. This was achieved through the exchange of monetary funds and benefits through which the followers could achieve such needs. Acceptance was

Leadership Models and Communication

1117 words - 4 pages premise of this "full range" leadership model (Avolio & Bass, 1989, p. 163) is that transformational leadership is not viewed as opposite ends of a continuum. The same leader can display each of the full range of behaviors or styles (i.e. transactional, transformational and even laissez-faire). Thus, transformational leadership does not replace transactional leadership but adds to it by encouraging followers and colleagues to put in the extra

Transformational leadership for change

703 words - 3 pages Transformational leadership is an important contemporary theory of leadership. Its one leadership style consistent with successful organizational change management.Burns argued that all leadership behavior is either transactional or transformational. Transactional behaviors are "largely oriented toward accomplishing the tasks at hand and at maintaining good relations with those working with the leader [exchanging promises of rewards for

How Personality Traits and Leadership Styles Influence Organizational Leadership

1618 words - 6 pages leadership is a synonym for effective management. Because transformational leaders are efficient at communicating the organizational vision, as extroverts, they influence others to accept the vision as well (as cited in Cable & Judge, 2003; Rosete & Ciarrochi, 2005). While some people would prefer to work under a charismatic, transformational leader, organizations also benefit from the transactional leader. The biggest difference between a

The Impact of Leadership Behavior on Organizational Commitment

4971 words - 20 pages for the sake of their self interest (Northouse, 2001). Even though the transactional leaders are quite effective in achieving short run targets but did not put any serious efforts for the personal career development of their employees, and did not care to develop trust and loyalty among their followers (Podsakoff et al., 1991). Bass (1985) suggested that transformational leadership is likely to emerge at the time of stress whereas transactional

Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management

4425 words - 18 pages succeed in the hospitality industry, Bond (1998) contends that leaders needed to combine strong interpersonal skills with sound business knowledge and hotel operational skills--in effect, arguing that a mix of transactional and transformational leadership skills are needed to succeed in the hospitality field. This article seeks to identify and assess the existence of gender differences in these leadership styles among hospitality professionals

The Usefulness Of The Styles And Contingency Approaches In The Managerial Context

2217 words - 9 pages LEADERSHIPPath-goal theory (House, 1996) is useful because it focuses primarily on the transactional approach to leadership whilst allowing for behaviours which will contribute to and create transformational leadership. The theory has propositions on what leadership style to use in certain situations that are applicable in most managerial contexts and has significantly expanded on the original theory to attempt to incorporate the work unit. The


974 words - 4 pages to be changed they transform it accordingly but in a way that no one is offended. They often aid employee satisfaction and reduce stress. To conclude Transformational leadership includes the 4 I's, viz. Intellectual Stimulation, Idealized Influence, Individualized Consideration, Inspirational Motivation. (Marquis, 2003)Transactional LeadershipTransactional Leadership mainly refers to a "leader who treats relationships with followers in terms of an

Comparing and Contrasting Leadership Models

2167 words - 9 pages to perform beyond their basic job requirements. Furthermore, although transactional leadership focuses on the exchange between the leader and followers, it is the leader who has the power and who controls the terms of the relationship.Transactional leadership diverges from transformational leadership in that the transactional leader does not individualize the needs of subordinates nor focus on their personal development.Contingency TheoryAlthough

Similar Essays

Transformational Vs. Transactional Leadership Essay

1947 words - 8 pages Introduction Over the past twenty years, an abundant body of researches have been done to review transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Burn (1978) was the first person to introduce and conceptualize the concept of transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Bass (1985) based on Burn’s concept and deepened his notion with modifications, which stated that one of the best frameworks of leadership is

Transformational Versus Transactional Leadership Essay

740 words - 3 pages the satisfaction of consumers (Aarons, 2006, p. 1163). It is evident that there is a difference between transformational and transactional leadership. The two forms of leaderships are seen to have a diverse relation to cultural and organizational boundaries studied in a number of research cases (Aarons, 2006, p. 1163). There are cases where leaders use both forms of leadership to enhance the output of their commitment to the organizations. This

Transactional Vs. Transformational Leadership Essay

3160 words - 13 pages Article Summary In the above article it discusses the transformational leadership style of Howard Schultz and it’s a effectiveness, we also see a comparison between transactional leadership and transformational leadership. Howard Schultz’s leadership style forces him to be more of a motivation towards his employee’s and also makes him take up a more proactive

Changing Hats: Incorporating Transactional, Transformational And Complexivist Leadership Styles Into 21st Century Classrooms

2970 words - 12 pages nature of our society. This needs to be reflected in the classroom. In my essay, I will argue that as teachers we need to draw from both transactional and transformational theories of leadership as they can help us understand how to effectively manage our learning environments but that we also need to begin to consider the complexity of an emerging society, promoting both creative and critical thinking. This requires us to move beyond these