This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Transformational Vs. Transactional Leadership Essay

1947 words - 8 pages

Over the past twenty years, an abundant body of researches have been done to review transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Burn (1978) was the first person to introduce and conceptualize the concept of transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Bass (1985) based on Burn’s concept and deepened his notion with modifications, which stated that one of the best frameworks of leadership is transformational or transactional. Following Bass and Avolio (1994, p. 4) provided the idea of these two leaderships and generalized them into the development of global economic world. Bass and Avolio (1997) also suggested that there was no need to view transformational and transactional leadership as opposing ways or leaderships when we applied them into our management. Recently, researchers have begun to increase the interest of investigating the relationship between these two leaderships and seeking the influences and correlation with other features, like personality, performance and behaviour towards effectiveness (Hartnell & Walumbwa, 2011, p. 225; Rowld & Rohmann, 2009, p. 42; Bono & Judge, 2004, p. 901; Eeden, Cilliers & Deventer, 2008, p. 253). In this essay, I would like to distinguish transformational and transactional leadership and talk the possible integrations between them.

Critical discussions
The main distinction of transformational and transactional leadership is the way that how leaders relate with followers and the acquisition they receive from each other (Burn, 1978). Transactional leadership requires exchange of resources as the leaders explain the procedure to followers and expects them to successfully complete their work to fulfil their needs (Eeden et al., 2008, p. 255). This is the part of transaction which satisfies followers’ needs as well by giving contingent reward as well. Leaders are aiming to control and surveillance employees through sensible and thrifty intention (Bass, 1985). It simply requires an agreement between leaders and followers toward organization goal (Burns, 1978). In transformation leadership, leaders focus on changing followers’ moral sensibilities and potentially increasing their motivation beyond self-interest (Kezar & Eckel, 2008, p. 381). It needs more associated with outcome criteria than transactional leadership (Rowold & Rohmann, 2009, p. 42). Transformational leadership helps to build positive relationship among staff and raising their morale. In contrast, transactional leadership helps to build the fundamental structure of the organisation (Kezar & Eckel, 2008, p. 383).

Transformational leadership are classified into four components which are pointed out by Bass (1990, p. 28), ‘charisma, idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration’. Apart from these basic roles, charisma leadership, a collection of personal characteristics, has its own role of literature since it has...

Find Another Essay On Transformational vs. Transactional Leadership

Changing Hats: Incorporating Transactional, Transformational and Complexivist Leadership Styles into 21st Century Classrooms

2970 words - 12 pages nature of our society. This needs to be reflected in the classroom. In my essay, I will argue that as teachers we need to draw from both transactional and transformational theories of leadership as they can help us understand how to effectively manage our learning environments but that we also need to begin to consider the complexity of an emerging society, promoting both creative and critical thinking. This requires us to move beyond these

Diversity in Western vs Eastern Transformational Leadership

1617 words - 6 pages B.M. Bass developed a study in 1985 on leadership in the western world which focused on western leaders and how they influenced their subordinates. What he found was that leaders across organizations shared similar attributes. He referred to this style as “transformational leadership”. Through this style, leaders “inspire followers to transcend self-interest for the good of the organization and can have an extraordinary effect on their followers

Characteristics of a Leader and Two Types of Leadership

1001 words - 5 pages . 2014. . 4. "Transformational Leadership Vs. Transactional Leadership Definition." Small Business. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. . 5. "Transactional Versus Transformational Leaders." Boundless. Web. 13 Mar. 2014.

How important of leadership in business - RMIT - Short essay

813 words - 4 pages leadership on employees creativity’, Scinzer Journal of Accounting and Management, Vol 2, Issue 4, (2016): 70-77. 9. Northouse, P. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice, 6th edn, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishing. 10. Odumeru A & Ifeanyi, O 2013, Transformational vs. Transactional Leadership Theories: Evidence in Literature, International Review of Management and Business Research, Vol2, Issue 2, June, viewed 6 Aug 2017,

Leadership ASS1 Part 2 - Assignment

604 words - 3 pages :// Retrieved 9 11, 2017, from Small Business. Solar, A. (2017, 8 7). Retrieved 9 12, 2017, from BAMBU. Spahr, P. (2015, 9 16). Retrieved 9 10, 2017 Spahr, P. (2015, 9 16). sT. Retrieved 9 10, 2017, from

The Study of Leadership and the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire

1817 words - 7 pages approach was only after the work of the political sociologist James McGregor. In his book Leadership(1978), he attempted to link the roles of leadership and followership. He also distinguished leadership into transformational leadership and transactional leadership. According to Burns(1978), transactional leaders are those who work on the exchange principle and transforming leaders are those who engage with the followers and raise their motivation and

The Usefulness Of The Styles And Contingency Approaches In The Managerial Context

2217 words - 9 pages LEADERSHIPPath-goal theory (House, 1996) is useful because it focuses primarily on the transactional approach to leadership whilst allowing for behaviours which will contribute to and create transformational leadership. The theory has propositions on what leadership style to use in certain situations that are applicable in most managerial contexts and has significantly expanded on the original theory to attempt to incorporate the work unit. The

The Impact of Transformational Leadership in the Workplace

1948 words - 8 pages effective communication, and how it correlates to follower satisfaction. Transformational Leadership vs Transactional Leadership Ethical charisma and effective communication have proved to be successful tools in organizational development and success. Lussier and Achua states “Transformational Leadership seeks to change the status quo by articulating to followers the problems in the current system and a compelling vision of what the organization

Assignment 8; Signature Assignment

2641 words - 11 pages situations transformational leadership as opposes to authoritarian and transactional leadership possibly hinders operations during times of crisis when charismatic leadership takes a back seat to overall mission effectiveness. The characteristics of a military leader often involves the attributes of Challenges facing military an expertise, mentor, strategist and often time’s counselor, all of which require the ability to adapt and overcome

Leadership and complex adaptive systems

1710 words - 7 pages Although current leadership theory emphasizes the distinction between transactional and transformational leadership, in fact, most leaders have a mixed profile of the full range of leadership styles. The best form of leadership is not only transformational or only transactional, but rather a combination of the two. However, in order to better understand each style's pros and cons, they have to be discussed in terms of similarities and

Leadership Behavior in the Workplace

1022 words - 5 pages . Transactional Leadership Retrieved from John Hall, Shannon Johnson, Allen Wysocki, and Karl Kepne (2013) Transformational Hesselbein, Frances, and Paul M. Cohen. (1999). Leader to Leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Kendra Cherry, (2012) Becoming a Better Leader

Similar Essays

Transactional Vs. Transformational Leadership Essay

3160 words - 13 pages Article Summary In the above article it discusses the transformational leadership style of Howard Schultz and it’s a effectiveness, we also see a comparison between transactional leadership and transformational leadership. Howard Schultz’s leadership style forces him to be more of a motivation towards his employee’s and also makes him take up a more proactive

Transformational & Transactional Leadership Essay

925 words - 4 pages Introduction Over the past twenty years, an abundant body of researches have been done to review transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Burn (1978) was the first person to introduce and conceptualize the concept of transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Bass (1985) based on Burn’s concept and deepen his notion with modifications, which stated that one of the best frameworks of leadership is

Leadership: Transactional Versus Transformational Essay

1026 words - 5 pages Weber (1920/1947, p. 358-359) described charisma, as a personality characteristic possessed by extraordinary, god-like exemplars. Robbins and Langton (2003, p. 395) asserted that the two most popular approaches to leadership are contingency models and the study of charisma. Burns (1978, p. 4) who built upon the work of Weber categorized two types of leaders, transactional and transformational. Kuhnert and Lewis (1987, p. 650) argued that

Transformational Versus Transactional Leadership Essay

740 words - 3 pages the satisfaction of consumers (Aarons, 2006, p. 1163). It is evident that there is a difference between transformational and transactional leadership. The two forms of leaderships are seen to have a diverse relation to cultural and organizational boundaries studied in a number of research cases (Aarons, 2006, p. 1163). There are cases where leaders use both forms of leadership to enhance the output of their commitment to the organizations. This