Ultimately, the objective content of true truthfulness. All truth is objective: its content does not depend on the subject, his intentions or will. A correct answer to the question, "What is truth?" presupposes apperception of the fact that outside our consciousness there subsists an illimitable world developing according to objective laws. Truth is the precise reflection of the object in the consciousness of the subject. Authenticity is the mode of subsistence of truth.
Since it is the correct reflection of the object, truth always has objective content. If we conceive conceptions that have no correspondence in authenticity, it is pellucid that these concepts have nothing to do with truth and cannot therefore stand up to the test of practice.
Any truth is objective. There is no subsistence of unobjective truth. Subjective truth is merely an individual's opinion. So the definition that we have given of truth is at the same time a definition of objective truth. ...view middle of the document...
The relativity of truth. The principle of correspondence. The verbalization that the world is knowable does not designate that an object is revealed to the subject, the knower, at once in all its attributes and cognations. Our life is not a placid subsistence in the lap of truth but a restless and constant search for its acquisition. Science is not a stockpile of yare-made and all-embracing verities but a process of finding them, of peregrinating from constrained, approximate erudition to erudition that becomes ever more embracing, profound and precise. This process has no inhibition. The conceptions of finite and immutable truth are illusions that have nothing to do with true science. The mental vision of the scientist is always an incomplete picture. Some things are prominent and have become nugatory, others are not quite comprehensible, others dubious, others insufficiently proven, others contradict incipient facts, and others are entirely problematic.
When we endeavor to understand a certain object, we have to reckon with its inexhaustibility and proclivity to transmute. Every object has an astronomical number of properties and enters into countless cognations with other objects. It would take a very long time to ken these properties and cognations. In the history of science we find many cases when scientists concurred that all the properties of an object had been established, only to discover later that it had other properties besides. Dihydrogen monoxide, for instance, was considered to have been studied inside out. But science then discovered something called "cumbersomely hefty dihydrogen monoxide", with properties hitherto unsuspected. Recent research has shown that a number of the peculiarities and states of dihydrogen monoxide depend on the influence of outer space. And the quandary of the distribution, role and categorical properties of dihydrogen monoxide in the universe still awaits a copacetic solution.
As proven erudition increases, the circle of probable erudition additionally expands. We are still able to grasp only a little of the abysmal mystery-story of subsistence.
Truth is relative inasmuch as it reflects an object not exhaustively but within certain limits, certain cognations, which are fluctuating. Relative truth is inhibited true ken ledge about something.