This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Twelve Angry Men Essay

1149 words - 5 pages

Introduction: The movie ?Twelve Angry Men? involves twelve men, all of different ages, chosen for jury duty. Their case, a young boy accused of killing his father. The jurors had to reach a unanimous decision based on whether the boy was innocent or guilty of murder. The twelve men were placed in a small jury room, located inside the courtroom, where it was very warm because of the weather outside. Upon entering the room, each jury member was seated around a rectangular table according to his jury number in the courtroom.At first, only one man found the boy innocent of the crime. Others immediately thought the boy was guilty after listening to the evidence in the court. The man who stood behind the boy entirely gave his reasoning to how the boy could not have committed this crime. Soon after that, another vote was taken and other men started to join the first guy in his reasoning. The men continued to state and argue their thoughts about the evidence concerning the case. This, what the men thought would take only a short period of time, went on for numerous hours.Each time more evidence was discussed and opinions were stated, another vote was taken to see where the twelve men stood. On every occasion, the numbers changed, adding another vote to the innocent side. Finally, towards the end of the movie, the first guy was able to convince all the other jury members that the boy was indeed innocent. It took a long time, a lot of patience, and a lot of arguing of their positions to arrive at the final decision that they walked into the courtroom with. All twelve jurors reached a unanimous decision, finding the boy innocent of killing his deadbeat dad.Critical Analysis: The negotiation process that took place between the twelve jury members was a decision making process by which the men were to come up with a unanimous vote of guilty or innocent. The outstanding nature of this situation meant that the jurors had to negotiate and renegotiate their decisions until they all agreed on the same verdict. The men had to develop a bargaining style that would work within the jury room and with the limited, available resources they had.In the beginning, the twelve men ha trouble getting the conversation started. The first guy said that he just wanted to talk before sending a young boy off to die. This was showing his deep interest in the case. He was also interested in what the others were thinking about and why they were so determined to send a boy to die, even if he was guilty.The first and second juror members who passed on talking were soft negotiators because they revealed their reservation point and agreed too readily. On the other hand, the man who thought the boy was innocent from the beginning was a tough negotiator. He would not fall to pressure from the other hard negotiators in the room arguing against him. He may have gained a reputation for being stubborn in the beginning because he would not give up on his reasoning causing everyone to be stuck in...

Find Another Essay On Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men Essay

1488 words - 6 pages other like kids until they conclude a verdict. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a group of men are summoned for jury duty and almost all of the men would rather conclude a verdict immediately and leave; except for one, Juror #8. He managed to detain the group by requesting for a discussion of the murder trial before voting “guilty” or “not guilty.” Not once did Juror #8 allow the others to influence him unless they had a valid explanation. Often

Twelve Angry Men Juror Notes Essay

1100 words - 4 pages anything to do with it. The facts are supposed to determine the case."Examine this conflict and whether it is resolved or not?Twelve Angry Men is about the conflict between prejudice and logic• Prejudice - racism and discrimination• Logic - facts and thinking objectivelyThe matter is resolved in the actual court case but the matter is not resolved in American society.At the end of twelve angry men, the outcome of the trial is correct but

Movie Analysis "Twelve Angry Men"

1745 words - 7 pages Movie Analysis Movie Analysis 1 Running head: Movie Analysis on Conflict in Groups Movie Analysis on Conflict in Groups "Twelve Angry Men" Movie Analysis 2 Group communication is the interaction of three or more individuals working together to achieve a common goal. As we know, groups, like the individual members, have different characteristics and concerns

Film Analysis: Twelve Angry Men

2027 words - 8 pages The movie "Twelve Angry Men" is about a young man who is accused of stabbing his father to death. The twelve jurors have to decide whether the defendant is guilty or innocent. If the young man is found guilty, there is a mandatory death sentence (the jury needs to be unanimous in their decision). At the preliminary vote, eleven of the twelve jurors vote the young man guilty. Henry Fonda is the only one who voted the accused as not guilty because

Tension in Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

2071 words - 8 pages Tension in Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men Twelve Angry Men is set in summertime New York, 1957. Where a juvenile delinquent is put on trial for stabbing his violent father in the chest with a unique knife. A jury of twelve men is ordered by the judge to vote guilty if there is no reasonable doubt. In the ballot: eleven vote guilty, but one feels the need to discuss the boy's guilt and the ambiguity of the evidence

Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose

695 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose The play "Twelve Angry Men", By Reginald Rose, is a play about 12 jurors that in an uncomfortable room have to discuss a life and death case about a boy that is accused or killing his father. the jurors do not really know eachother to talk to and wish they were anywhere but in that jury room. Every juror has a different emotional pattern that makes the play interesting. In my opinion there were 3 main

Facets Of Human Nature- Twelve Angry Men

972 words - 4 pages Aneeb Adrees - practice sac- Q2) the jurors represent the worst facets of human nature and of soceity itself. Do you agree?In Reginald Roses Twelve angry men, Rose illustrates and explores the worst facets of human nature. Through his depiction of the jurors, and the way they interact, Rose creates an environment where fallibilities of human beings can be examined. Rose depicts prejudice, self-interest along with many other negative traits a

Demonstrations of Leadership in Twelve Angry Men

709 words - 3 pages The film Twelve Angry Men, while great for entertainment alone (who doesn’t like to watch people argue?), helps show aspects of leadership and negotiation. In this film, a jury is attempting to decide whether a boy is guilty of murder, with evidence piled high against him. However, one juror stands firm and says that they should at least give him an hour. This is where the more interesting part of the story begins. At first, Juror Eight was the

My Verdict of Twelve Angry Men

883 words - 4 pages On Friday, April 18, I attended the Henderson State University production of Twelve Angry Men. Reginald Rose wrote the playwright of Twelve Angry Men and Sherman L. Sergel had it adapted. The performance took place in the Arkansas Hall Studio Theatre on Henderson State campus. Fortunately, I had the opportunity of watching the Good Friday performance of this play and it did everything but disappoint. I didn’t know much about this playwright

Twelve Angry Men: a critical review

2122 words - 8 pages them to change the minds of each and every person out there that disagrees with what they feel is right and pursue them to conform to their convictions.But in a realistic world, is that possible? Can one person change the minds of eleven others when what they feel and believe has already been set in stone and engraved on their hearts? Twelve Angry Men poses this question and provides an answer. And although it is obviously done with a Hollywood

Twelve Angry Men and the Jurors of The Kevorkian Trials

2347 words - 9 pages people carry out their death wishes; therefore, his solution was a suicide machine (Chermak 103). In this way, more than 130 were helped by Dr. Kevorkian and his suicide machine (Chua-Eoan). Although Kevorkian was tried five times, he was found innocent four times (Chermak 108-115). His jury had an onerous time coming to their conclusion. Throughout Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose, Twelve jurors had to decide the fate of one boy convicted

Similar Essays

Twelve Angry Men Essay

818 words - 3 pages Put yourself on trial, where 11 jurors out of 12 vote guilty. Although you are innocent, and the one man in the jury who votes not guilty has reasonable doubt for your guilt. Your life is in twelve angry mens' hands. You can hardly defend yourself. It's up to the jurors to interpret the words in the testimonies to find the truth. In "Twelve Angry Men," by Reginald Rose the main factor's that create reasonable doubt for the jurors to look at were

Twelve Angry Men Essay

664 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men The jury in a trial is selected to examine certain facts and determine truth based only upon the evidence presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurors will judge fairly and without any personal bias. In spite of this assumption people will be people and in some cases, logic and emotion will collide. An excellent example that shows precisely what I’m talking about is in the movie Twelve Angry Men. Twelve men who

Twelve Angry Men Plot Essay

610 words - 2 pages Plot: “Twelve Angry Men” is an interesting and exciting jury-room confrontation in which an "open and shut case" becomes strenuous as twelve strangers scuffle for answers. The trial involves a nineteen-year-old boy, who is suspect of killing his father in a late-night altercation with an extraordinary knife. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. As the

Twelve Angry Men Essay

644 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting play about an unfortunate young man, who was convicted of killing his dad. The worst part was, the young man was only nineteen, and his life was just starting. The jurors listened to all the evidence, then came the hard part, making the decision: guilty, or innocent. Eleven jurors said guilty and only one said innocent. There was a lot of peer pressure involved. I decided to write about different peer