This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Twelve Angry Men And The Jurors Of The Kevorkian Trials

2347 words - 9 pages

“I can’t Function as a human being… I want the right to die,” pleaded Sherry Miller, patient of Dr. Jack Kevorkian, the famous “Death Doctor” (Chermak 107). The entitlement to commit suicide was never a problem, that is until it was challenged by Dr. Jack Kevorkian. Kevorkian was born in Pontiac, Michigan in 1928 (Chermak 101). His infatuation with death started when his mother died from cancer. Kevorkian wanted to find an easier way to help people carry out their death wishes; therefore, his solution was a suicide machine (Chermak 103). In this way, more than 130 were helped by Dr. Kevorkian and his suicide machine (Chua-Eoan). Although Kevorkian was tried five times, he was found innocent four times (Chermak 108-115). His jury had an onerous time coming to their conclusion. Throughout Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose, Twelve jurors had to decide the fate of one boy convicted of stabbing his father in the chest. In the beginning, eleven of the twelve were positive that the boy was guilty and nothing could change their minds, but Juror Eight disagreed. He showed them the holes in each of the testimonies. After hours of debating, Juror Eight was able to convince most the jury into seeing reasonable doubt in the boys guilt. When the last vote was taken, the tally was eleven to one in favor of innocent. In the end, there are many similarities between the jurors from Twelve Angry Men and the jurors of the Kevorkian trials because they all had a complicated trial, and their rulings were influenced by their personal thoughts and pasts.
Throughout Dr. Kevorkian’s career, he challenged the law unlike many. Kevorkian was tried five times, but four out of the five he was found innocent due to the complications with his offences of the law (Chermak 108-115). For the first four trials, Kevorkian's patients technically killed themselves: they flipped the switch on Kevorkian's death machine, so he could not be deemed responsible for their deaths along with many of his patients (Chermak 108-113). Kevorkian was starting an uprising even though he is not the only doctor to assist in suicides. According to Joseph Bowermaster, author of “Death on Trial,” “There are 2,300 cases of doctors helping patients with suicide, 400 gave the lethal pills or the instrument used to complete the suicide and 1,040 killed without request or consent fromt the patient. In 45% of cases of involuntary euthanasia in hospitals, doctors didn't even consult family members.” There are many cases of doctors who, like Kevorkian, want to help the helpless. Dr. Jack Kevorkian was not the first doctor to assist in suicides, yet the government still didn't have a specific law prohibiting this type of work. The government fought hard against Kevorkian but the never won, since each time Kevorkian worked his way around the law. Not only did he show proof of consent, but he also made sure that he was never the one to flip the switch. However, on his last trial, Kevorkian did not continue...

Find Another Essay On Twelve Angry Men and the Jurors of The Kevorkian Trials

Twelve Angry Men Essay

644 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting play about an unfortunate young man, who was convicted of killing his dad. The worst part was, the young man was only nineteen, and his life was just starting. The jurors listened to all the evidence, then came the hard part, making the decision: guilty, or innocent. Eleven jurors said guilty and only one said innocent. There was a lot of peer pressure involved. I decided to write about different peer

Twelve Angry Men Essay

664 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men The jury in a trial is selected to examine certain facts and determine truth based only upon the evidence presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurors will judge fairly and without any personal bias. In spite of this assumption people will be people and in some cases, logic and emotion will collide. An excellent example that shows precisely what I’m talking about is in the movie Twelve Angry Men. Twelve men who

Twelve Angry Men

1149 words - 5 pages Introduction: The movie ?Twelve Angry Men? involves twelve men, all of different ages, chosen for jury duty. Their case, a young boy accused of killing his father. The jurors had to reach a unanimous decision based on whether the boy was innocent or guilty of murder. The twelve men were placed in a small jury room, located inside the courtroom, where it was very warm because of the weather outside. Upon entering the room, each jury member was

Twelve Angry Men

1488 words - 6 pages other like kids until they conclude a verdict. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a group of men are summoned for jury duty and almost all of the men would rather conclude a verdict immediately and leave; except for one, Juror #8. He managed to detain the group by requesting for a discussion of the murder trial before voting “guilty” or “not guilty.” Not once did Juror #8 allow the others to influence him unless they had a valid explanation. Often

Facets Of Human Nature- Twelve Angry Men

972 words - 4 pages Aneeb Adrees - practice sac- Q2) the jurors represent the worst facets of human nature and of soceity itself. Do you agree?In Reginald Roses Twelve angry men, Rose illustrates and explores the worst facets of human nature. Through his depiction of the jurors, and the way they interact, Rose creates an environment where fallibilities of human beings can be examined. Rose depicts prejudice, self-interest along with many other negative traits a

Demonstrations of Leadership in Twelve Angry Men

709 words - 3 pages The film Twelve Angry Men, while great for entertainment alone (who doesn’t like to watch people argue?), helps show aspects of leadership and negotiation. In this film, a jury is attempting to decide whether a boy is guilty of murder, with evidence piled high against him. However, one juror stands firm and says that they should at least give him an hour. This is where the more interesting part of the story begins. At first, Juror Eight was the

My Verdict of Twelve Angry Men

883 words - 4 pages On Friday, April 18, I attended the Henderson State University production of Twelve Angry Men. Reginald Rose wrote the playwright of Twelve Angry Men and Sherman L. Sergel had it adapted. The performance took place in the Arkansas Hall Studio Theatre on Henderson State campus. Fortunately, I had the opportunity of watching the Good Friday performance of this play and it did everything but disappoint. I didn’t know much about this playwright

The Factors Influencing the Way Each of the Members of the Jury Perceived the Murder in Twelve Angry Men

1214 words - 5 pages The Factors Influencing the Way Each of the Members of the Jury Perceived the Murder in Twelve Angry Men Each of the members of the jury perceived the murder according to their own beliefs, values and social status. As the story unfolds, reveals the jurors' complex personalities, preconceptions, backgrounds and interactions. The most important factors that influence perception is personality, learning and motivation

Film Analysis: Twelve Angry Men

2027 words - 8 pages The movie "Twelve Angry Men" is about a young man who is accused of stabbing his father to death. The twelve jurors have to decide whether the defendant is guilty or innocent. If the young man is found guilty, there is a mandatory death sentence (the jury needs to be unanimous in their decision). At the preliminary vote, eleven of the twelve jurors vote the young man guilty. Henry Fonda is the only one who voted the accused as not guilty because

Movie Analysis "Twelve Angry Men"

1745 words - 7 pages source of group conflict, we can provide many examples from the movie "Twelve Angry Men" because all jurors are so different and do not know each other very well. Juror #3, for example, is obviously the absolute opposite to juror #5. Juror #3 has no tolerance and respect; he is rude and loud-mouthed. At one time during the discussion, he shouts: "Why listen to facts, I am right! The guy is guilty. You are all listen to stories of a

Twelve Angry Men Juror Notes

1100 words - 4 pages anything to do with it. The facts are supposed to determine the case."Examine this conflict and whether it is resolved or not?Twelve Angry Men is about the conflict between prejudice and logic• Prejudice - racism and discrimination• Logic - facts and thinking objectivelyThe matter is resolved in the actual court case but the matter is not resolved in American society.At the end of twelve angry men, the outcome of the trial is correct but

Similar Essays

The Nature Of The Jurors Of 12 Angry Men

971 words - 4 pages To place multiple men in a room to decide the fate over a criminal can lead to many biases being expressed in means to back up one's opinion on the case. The personal predilections & biases made by some individuals who happen to be part of a jury can ultimately either place an innocent man in jail or let a guilty man run free. The Reginald Rose play Twelve Angry Men shows just how dangerous it is for jurors to bring their personal agendas

A Real Twelve Angry Men And The Rodney King Trial

1900 words - 8 pages It was April 29th, 1992, and “Dawn was just filtering over Los Angeles and Courtroom 890 was silent as a tomb”(Mathews 1). The Rodney King trial had taken a little over two months and the verdict had the potential to change the history of the United States indefinitely. In both the Rodney King Beating Trial and the play Twelve Angry Men, racism played a major part in the original verdict. Rodney King was definitely in the wrong on the night of

Twelve Angry Men Plot Essay

610 words - 2 pages Plot: “Twelve Angry Men” is an interesting and exciting jury-room confrontation in which an "open and shut case" becomes strenuous as twelve strangers scuffle for answers. The trial involves a nineteen-year-old boy, who is suspect of killing his father in a late-night altercation with an extraordinary knife. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. As the

Twelve Angry Men Essay

818 words - 3 pages Put yourself on trial, where 11 jurors out of 12 vote guilty. Although you are innocent, and the one man in the jury who votes not guilty has reasonable doubt for your guilt. Your life is in twelve angry mens' hands. You can hardly defend yourself. It's up to the jurors to interpret the words in the testimonies to find the truth. In "Twelve Angry Men," by Reginald Rose the main factor's that create reasonable doubt for the jurors to look at were