Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose
The play "Twelve Angry Men", By Reginald Rose, is a play about 12 jurors that in an
uncomfortable room have to discuss a life and death case about a boy that is accused or killing
his father. the jurors do not really know eachother to talk to and wish they were anywhere but in
that jury room. Every juror has a different emotional pattern that makes the play interesting. In
my opinion there were 3 main jurors in the jury room: Juror 8, Juror 3 and Juror 9. Juror 8 is
important because he is smart, brave, and fair. Juror 3 was important because he was the
antagonist, he was mean, and he was intolerant. Juror 9 was important because he wasn't afraid
of confronting other jurors.
Juror 8 was a very important juror, he was the protagonist. He was the one that proved the truth.
Juror 8 was very smart, he bought a knife similar to the one used in the crime to prove that is
easy to get an identical knife, and he proved that it was impossible for the old man to make it to
the scene of the crime in 15 seconds like he testified.
Juror 8 was also brave. He was the only one that voted not guilty in the first vote and he standed
for what he believed in and confronted everybody.
In addition, Juror 8 was also fair. He said "It's not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy
off to die with out talking about it first" when he was the only one that voted not guilty in the
first vote. He also listened to everyone's opinions and never insulted anyone.
Juror 3 was also a very important juror in the jury room.
Juror 3 was the antagonist. He was the main enemy of Juror 8 and he was trying to keep people
from believing that the boy was not guilty.
Juror 3 was also mean. He wanted everyone to think the way he did, and lost his temper
whenever they didn't.
In addition, Juror 3 was also...