This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

695 words - 3 pages

Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose

The play "Twelve Angry Men", By Reginald Rose, is a play about 12 jurors that in an
uncomfortable room have to discuss a life and death case about a boy that is accused or killing
his father. the jurors do not really know eachother to talk to and wish they were anywhere but in
that jury room. Every juror has a different emotional pattern that makes the play interesting. In
my opinion there were 3 main jurors in the jury room: Juror 8, Juror 3 and Juror 9. Juror 8 is
important because he is smart, brave, and fair. Juror 3 was important because he was the
antagonist, he was mean, and he was intolerant. Juror 9 was important because he wasn't afraid
of confronting other jurors.

Juror 8 was a very important juror, he was the protagonist. He was the one that proved the truth.
Juror 8 was very smart, he bought a knife similar to the one used in the crime to prove that is
easy to get an identical knife, and he proved that it was impossible for the old man to make it to
the scene of the crime in 15 seconds like he testified.
Juror 8 was also brave. He was the only one that voted not guilty in the first vote and he standed
for what he believed in and confronted everybody.
In addition, Juror 8 was also fair. He said "It's not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy
off to die with out talking about it first" when he was the only one that voted not guilty in the
first vote. He also listened to everyone's opinions and never insulted anyone.

Juror 3 was also a very important juror in the jury room.
Juror 3 was the antagonist. He was the main enemy of Juror 8 and he was trying to keep people
from believing that the boy was not guilty.
Juror 3 was also mean. He wanted everyone to think the way he did, and lost his temper
whenever they didn't.
In addition, Juror 3 was also...

Find Another Essay On Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose

Twelve Angry Men Plot Essay

610 words - 2 pages Plot: “Twelve Angry Men” is an interesting and exciting jury-room confrontation in which an "open and shut case" becomes strenuous as twelve strangers scuffle for answers. The trial involves a nineteen-year-old boy, who is suspect of killing his father in a late-night altercation with an extraordinary knife. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. As the

Twelve Angry Men Essay

644 words - 3 pages . He was also trying to recreate a situation to see if indeed one of the witnesses on the stand was lying. Quotes like this one convinced me that #8 was very wise and intelligent person: "If he heard anything at all, he still couldn't have identified to voice with the el roaring by..." (The el is a train)I believe Twelve Angry Men situation could happen in the real life, and I am almost certain it has already happened, however I do not

Twelve Angry Men

1488 words - 6 pages other like kids until they conclude a verdict. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a group of men are summoned for jury duty and almost all of the men would rather conclude a verdict immediately and leave; except for one, Juror #8. He managed to detain the group by requesting for a discussion of the murder trial before voting “guilty” or “not guilty.” Not once did Juror #8 allow the others to influence him unless they had a valid explanation. Often

Comparisson/Contrast between the play: "12 Angry Men" by Reginald Rose, and the poem: "The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost

1070 words - 4 pages "Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, and I-- / I took the one less traveled by, / And that has made all the difference" (Frost "The Road Not Taken" 18-20). Two great pieces of literature, Frost's poem and Reginald Rose's play 12 Angry Men, treat the theme of making difficult decisions with openness and honesty. In "The Road Not Taken," a man walks along a road in a "yellow wood." He comes to a fork in the road and must decide which path to take

This is an essay about "12 Angry Men", by Reginald Rose. It describes juror 6 and the cons of the Jury System

942 words - 4 pages Juror 6:In the story "12 angry Men", by Reginald Rose, juror six is described as an honest but slow man, one who finds it difficult to create a positive opinion, and is often listening and slowly trying to understand the opinions of others, rather then forming his own. In the text of the play, we can find examples of many of these characteristics of juror six and even more that were not given to us by the author.The first, and most obvious

Twelve Angry Men Juror Notes

1100 words - 4 pages anything to do with it. The facts are supposed to determine the case."Examine this conflict and whether it is resolved or not?Twelve Angry Men is about the conflict between prejudice and logic• Prejudice - racism and discrimination• Logic - facts and thinking objectivelyThe matter is resolved in the actual court case but the matter is not resolved in American society.At the end of twelve angry men, the outcome of the trial is correct but

Movie Analysis "Twelve Angry Men"

1745 words - 7 pages Movie Analysis Movie Analysis 1 Running head: Movie Analysis on Conflict in Groups Movie Analysis on Conflict in Groups "Twelve Angry Men" Movie Analysis 2 Group communication is the interaction of three or more individuals working together to achieve a common goal. As we know, groups, like the individual members, have different characteristics and concerns

Film Analysis: Twelve Angry Men

2027 words - 8 pages displayed throughout the movie "Twelve Angry Men". Henry Fonda emerged as a leader because of his motivation and respect earned from others. Although he was surrounded by intimidating people he was able to emerge into various leadership styles. There is a lot to learn from this movie and it shows that anyone is able to influence others through effective leadership.ReferencesLumet, S. (Director). (1957). Twelve Angry Men. United States: United Artists.Rothwell, D. J. (2007). In Mixed Company: Communicating in Small Groups and Team (6th edition). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.

Facets Of Human Nature- Twelve Angry Men

972 words - 4 pages Aneeb Adrees - practice sac- Q2) the jurors represent the worst facets of human nature and of soceity itself. Do you agree?In Reginald Roses Twelve angry men, Rose illustrates and explores the worst facets of human nature. Through his depiction of the jurors, and the way they interact, Rose creates an environment where fallibilities of human beings can be examined. Rose depicts prejudice, self-interest along with many other negative traits a

My Verdict of Twelve Angry Men

883 words - 4 pages On Friday, April 18, I attended the Henderson State University production of Twelve Angry Men. Reginald Rose wrote the playwright of Twelve Angry Men and Sherman L. Sergel had it adapted. The performance took place in the Arkansas Hall Studio Theatre on Henderson State campus. Fortunately, I had the opportunity of watching the Good Friday performance of this play and it did everything but disappoint. I didn’t know much about this playwright

Demonstrations of Leadership in Twelve Angry Men

709 words - 3 pages The film Twelve Angry Men, while great for entertainment alone (who doesn’t like to watch people argue?), helps show aspects of leadership and negotiation. In this film, a jury is attempting to decide whether a boy is guilty of murder, with evidence piled high against him. However, one juror stands firm and says that they should at least give him an hour. This is where the more interesting part of the story begins. At first, Juror Eight was the

Similar Essays

Tension In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

2071 words - 8 pages Tension in Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men Twelve Angry Men is set in summertime New York, 1957. Where a juvenile delinquent is put on trial for stabbing his violent father in the chest with a unique knife. A jury of twelve men is ordered by the judge to vote guilty if there is no reasonable doubt. In the ballot: eleven vote guilty, but one feels the need to discuss the boy's guilt and the ambiguity of the evidence

Twelve Angry Men Essay

818 words - 3 pages Put yourself on trial, where 11 jurors out of 12 vote guilty. Although you are innocent, and the one man in the jury who votes not guilty has reasonable doubt for your guilt. Your life is in twelve angry mens' hands. You can hardly defend yourself. It's up to the jurors to interpret the words in the testimonies to find the truth. In "Twelve Angry Men," by Reginald Rose the main factor's that create reasonable doubt for the jurors to look at were

Twelve Angry Men Essay

1149 words - 5 pages Introduction: The movie ?Twelve Angry Men? involves twelve men, all of different ages, chosen for jury duty. Their case, a young boy accused of killing his father. The jurors had to reach a unanimous decision based on whether the boy was innocent or guilty of murder. The twelve men were placed in a small jury room, located inside the courtroom, where it was very warm because of the weather outside. Upon entering the room, each jury member was

Twelve Angry Men Essay

664 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men The jury in a trial is selected to examine certain facts and determine truth based only upon the evidence presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurors will judge fairly and without any personal bias. In spite of this assumption people will be people and in some cases, logic and emotion will collide. An excellent example that shows precisely what I’m talking about is in the movie Twelve Angry Men. Twelve men who