This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Tyranny Or Ideal Society Essay

929 words - 4 pages

Tyranny or Ideal Society

Many arguments have occurred over the centuries since the Spanish marched into the Andean highlands and took over the Incan empire, over whether the Incan's were part of an ideal human society, or just a group of tyrannical rulers. While the Incan society had created a stable political, economic, and social system in the Andean world it was far from being an ideal society. On the same note, the Incan's were not tyrannical rulers, did not exploit their subjects or take away their land for no reason. The reading entitled "Was Inca Rule Tyrannical?" discusses this argument about the Incan empire, tries to classify the form of government the Incan's lived under, and searches for the truth about what the Incan empire was really like. The truth about the Incan empire lies somewhere between the romanticized views, and the views meant to justify the Spanish conquest, while it is impossible to classify in modern terms the form of government the Incan's had.

The reading, after giving a brief introduction to the ideas behind the separate articles, is split into three different sections. The first of these sections is the section meant to idealize the Incan empire and cast doubt onto the appropriateness of the Spanish conquest of the Incas. The first two articles were written by conquistadores, Pedro de Cieza de León, and Mancio Sierra de Leguízamo. They both offer a romanticized view of the Incan culture. Cieza de León tries to paint a picture of the Incas as a ideal culture that tried to avoid war at any cost, while Sierra de Leguízamo paints a picture of a trusting uncorrupted society of Indians. These views are obviously slightly skewed, because it is hard to believe that anyone who was there at the time of the conquest would have believed that the Incas were an anti-war society. This is only because the Incan empire was in the middle of a brutal civil war at the time of the conquest. The brothers Atahualpa and Huascar had been fighting over who was the legitimate ruler of the Incas and because of this the Spanish had an easy time taking over the empire. This horribly brutal war witnessed by the conquistadores sheds doubt on the "idealness" of the Incan society that Cieza de León and Sierra de Leguízamo try to portray in their descriptions of the Incas.

The third article of the first section was written by Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, who was half Incan, and half Spanish. His account of the manner in which the Incas planted and harvested their crops gives a more moderate and believable view of what the Incan empire was really like. His heritage and knowledge of the Incan past gives his writing validity, and because it does...

Find Another Essay On Tyranny or Ideal Society

Plato's Republic Essay

1289 words - 5 pages office, just as only a certain type of people have the ability to be farmers. Therefore, justice only exists in a city when a division of labor takes place amongst its residents. The ideal city classifies people into what they do best. Those who have an arête (an excellence) for artistry would be artisans, or moneymakers, and those with the most reason- the philosophers- to guide the city's actions and perform in the cities best interest. A third

Macbeth is in a courtroom being trialed for being a murderer, usurper and tyrant. Write a final speech in the voice of a prosecutor

608 words - 2 pages Ladies, gentlemen and members of the jury: today we have viewed the heinous actions of a man who stands trial as a murderer, usurper and tyrant. Driven by his lust for power, this man, Macbeth, has not only broken the sixth commandment "thou shall not murder" he has also committed the highest form of crime: Regicide.Macbeth has not only dismissed our society's ideal of law and order, he has intervened with God's choice of King Duncan (may his

The Notions of Justice in The Republic and Antigone

2034 words - 8 pages reason on the basis of gender-bias and selfishness, all adding to the count against him of being a just leader. Sophocles has written Creon to be a tragic character though, as he ultimately loses everything dear to him in the end due to his selfish and tyrannical actions. Regarding justice, Sophocles shows that a just society cannot flourish under a tyrannical or immoral leader. Two sides of tyranny and immorality are presented in The Republic


1471 words - 6 pages raises the question regarding to beauty, that is what is the definition of beauty and who set the standard of ideal beauty? According to dictionary, beauty is defined as “the combination of all the qualities of a person or thing that delight the senses and please the mind”. (Anderson) In the real world, the definition of beauty are different among society. Most of the societies define beauty by the color of skin, eyes, body shape, and appearance. On

Federalist Vs. Antifederalist

1020 words - 4 pages prosper, without much involvement in government affairs and decisions.Leading the Republican, or Anti-Federalist, party was Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson and his organization favored a smaller, more personal form of State ruled government. By separating power between the states, the Anti-Federalists hoped to prevent tyranny similar to the situation that they experienced with England. Because of Jefferson's fear of tyranny he advocated a government

The Triumph of the Free Market

967 words - 4 pages by eliminating barriers and regulation detrimental to creative freedom. When another system supplants the free-market or a mixed economy is instituted, great damage is caused to the economic foundations of a society, eroding advancement and prosperity. Any system that is anti-market then, by definition, consists of contrary ideas. Mechanisms involved in collectivistic systems serve only to erode the mindset that encourages progress and success

Sensible Censorship

1107 words - 4 pages Sensible Censorship? In Plato’s Republic, Socrates claimed that stories affect the souls of those who hear them. Given this, he went on to argue that censorship was not only necessary but also beneficial to society. Socrates wanted to censor portions of poetry, the arts, and sciences that were not productive or beneficial to society. He believed that poetry was neither philosophical nor pragmatic and did not lead to true knowledge. Rather

The Liberal Democratic State: The End of History or simply another epoch?

1276 words - 5 pages democratic ideal: how can an ethos commit itself to both liberty - the sovereign individual- and equality –the sovereign demos-? Tocqueville noted that there were mechanisms in place in American democracy that “tempered the tyranny of the majority” (1994: 247), however he also conceded that in a democratic society there is a predilection for equality over liberty:“I think democratic peoples have a natural taste for liberty; left to

The Panopticon

1740 words - 7 pages , one may both uphold this mechanism and recognize its work and effect on the individual. Before the Enlightenment, individuals who went against the will of the kind were tortured and/or put to death in a spectacle which the whole society had the opportunity to witness. With the age of Enlightenment came a breakdown of the singular authority. This was replaced by a complex system of institutions known as government. Similarly, without the

Mill's Principles in His Work On Liberty

2739 words - 11 pages an irrational majority could easily exact a tyranny upon the rational minority as there would be no safeguards or restraints. The LP is put into place to stop this happening. Mill is interested in the restrictions that law is allowed to place on people, but he is also interested in the moral and social pressure that can be exerted by society upon individuals. He doesn't want people to blindly follow custom.[1] One of

Success of the people

1081 words - 5 pages Sovereign, House of Lords, and House of Commons) of England reigns supreme above all. And by so doing, they reduce the liberty of the people drastically. How are people able to have an opinion, let alone a voice, if the local governments are not able to exercise their authority? This to me sounds a lot like tyranny – the oppressive ruling of a government. This massive control of power is definitely not representative of a Good Society. The

Similar Essays

Equality Vs The Tyranny Of Majority

3673 words - 15 pages combining being supposed to be of full age, and not forced or deceived.” (Mill, 1869) By emphasizing on individual liberty, Mill gives the members of the minorities a power to stand up against the possibility of being oppressed by the majority. If practiced accordingly, every person in the society should be able to have a freedom to the extent that they are entitled to and any kind of tyranny would not be able to survive because tyranny would not

Tocqueville´S Faults Of Democracy In America

959 words - 4 pages society cannot survive or even come into existence. An additional problem that occurs from the influence of democracy is those problems that are produced because of the equality in America. Tocqueville realizes that the want of equality is a normal want. He writes of how France especially feels this desire. However, Tocqueville sees problems with equality when it is not perfect. When equality is perfect then it is pure freedom. However, when

The Genius Of The American Constitution

1295 words - 6 pages , they instead created a new and revolutionary government that was strong, powerful and protected the people against tyranny. The constitution guarded against tyranny by the separation of powers, a system of checks and balances, and by establishing federalism. The problem of tyranny can exist even within a democracy when “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many…may

Why Is Tyranny Of The Majority Worse Than Tyranny Of The Government Political Science Short Essay

588 words - 3 pages much that now people are seen as servants of the people rather than masters. He argues that tyranny of the majority is worse than they tyranny of the Government. Tyranny of the majority was at first, and still is profanely, held in fear, predominantly as working through the acts of the public authorities. Yet, reflecting when people perceive that society, it’s itself the tyrant—society; all things considered over the different people who form it