This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Uk Employment Law Case Study Of Fighting In The Workplace, Citing The Cases Of Meyer Dunmore Ltd V Rogers (1978) And Post Office V Fennell (1981) Johnson V Marney Superstores Plc

2202 words - 9 pages

Barry Johnson was employed by Marney Superstores as a warehouse operative at their Croydon premises from December 1997 until his dismissal 6 weeks ago (April 2003). He was dismissed on the grounds of gross misconduct, having been seen fighting with another employee in the warehouse.Mr Johnson is claiming unfair dismissal with an Employment Tribunal. The right not to be unfairly dismissed was made within the Employment Rights Act 1996. An application for unfair dismissal must be issued within 3 months of the date of termination of the employment unless a case can be made to the tribunal stating that it was not reasonably practical to do this within this time.There are certain categories of employees who are excluded from bringing an unfair dismissal case such as the police and the armed forces, people who have reached the normal retiring age (or 65 if there is no normal retiring age) and people who ordinarily work outside of the UK. The employee bears the onus of establishing three main points of their claim; that they were employed by the employer, that they were continuously employed by the employer for a period of twelve or more months and that they were dismissed.In a number of specified circumstances, a dismissal is deemed to be automatically unfair. Generally no qualifying period of service is required in these cases and employees in excess of the normal retirement age are not excluded. In brief, unfairness is judged where the principal ground for the dismissal relates to, for example, the employee being pregnant and the dismissal being a direct result of this, the assertion of statutory rights (such as the working time directive) and refusal by employees in shops or betting offices to work on Sundays.Constructive dismissal, if proven, counts as dismissal. To illustrate constructive dismissal the employee must establish that they terminated the contract by reason of a repudiatory breach (actual or anticipatory) on the part of the employer. They must leave in response to the breach and must not waive the breach by significantly delaying their departure. Examples of serious or repudiatory breaches include reducing the level of payment for work, fundamentally changing the nature of the job and failing to follow prescribed disciplinary or capability procedures.Mr Johnson does not appear to be in an excluded or automatically unfair category. Marney Superstores stated that he was dismissed so this is not a case for constructive dismissal. Mr Johnson was continuously employed by the firm for more than twelve months when he was dismissed so it would seem that he is eligible to bring a claim. The company employed Mr Johnson's colleague for less than twelve months when he was dismissed; the employer dismissed him so this is not a case for constructive dismissal. Mr Johnson does not appear to have a case for automatically unfair dismissal so it would appear that is not eligible to bring a case.The burden of proof shifts in this instance to the employer...

Find Another Essay On UK Employment Law Case study of fighting in the workplace, citing the cases of Meyer Dunmore Ltd v Rogers (1978) and Post Office v Fennell (1981) Johnson v Marney Superstores PLC

The landmark case of Marbury v. Madison

590 words - 2 pages decisions and be able to control the courtroom. The display of organization by the Supreme Court showed it had the power to change the law if necessary.To me the court case of Marbury vs. Madison was a great success in the Supreme Court. When faced with a problem they were able to correct the government system. However, I do not concur with the judges ruling in this court. James Madison should not have been trailed because was ordered by the

The Case of Plessy v. Ferguson

1026 words - 4 pages property without due process of law. This Act infringes on one's personal liberty to travel in whichever car one chooses without due process of law.4. Ferguson could legally justify his decision of the law's constitutionality in a single state but unconstitutional if the train traveled thru many states because it is a state's responsibility to decide how they handle their railroads, and that one state doesn't have the right to infringe on another

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

869 words - 4 pages -case-summary.aspx>. "Texas V. Johnson." Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School, n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2012. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0491_0397_ZS.html>. TEXAS v. JOHNSON. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 25 January 2014. .

Texas v. Johnson argumentative

816 words - 4 pages Texas v. Johnson Argumentative To this day, Americans have many rights and privileges. Rights stated in the United States constitution may be simple and to the point, but the rights Americans have may cause debate to whether or not something that happens in society, is completely reasonable. The Texas v. Johnson case created much debate due to a burning of the American Flag. One may say the burning of the flag was tolerable because of the

Texas v. Johnson

1710 words - 7 pages Texas v. Johnson (No. 88-155). Argued: March 21, 1989. Decided: June 21, 1989 In 1984 the Republican National Convention was held in Dallas, Texas. While there, a group of protesters, opposed to President Reagan's reelection, burned an American flag. Specifically, Greg Johnson was seen dousing the flag with kerosene and lighting it on fire. Johnson was arrested under a

The V-1 And V-2

1462 words - 6 pages WWII, one of the bloodiest wars in history. The Germans and the Axis Powers were combating the English and US with the other Allied Powers. From 1939-1945 war raged on in Europe and in the Pacific. In 1939 proposals were made (not approved until later) by the Nazi’s to create two of the most destructive and advanced weapons of the time (Gatland). Thus, the V-1 and V-2 rockets were put into production. The V-1 and V-2 rockets were important to

The Cases of Martin v. Hunter's Lessee and Ex parte McCardle

1811 words - 8 pages court’s decision was reversed. Martin then appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found that since the treaty superseded the state’s law, Martin was the rightful owner of the land and remanded the case back to Virginia Court of Appeals to enter a decision for Martin. The Virginia Court of Appeals refused to comply with the Supreme Court’s decision and questioned the Court’s jurisdiction in cases decided by a state

Ethical and legal analysis of the Ann Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse discrimination law suit. Focuses on case law and ethics

3145 words - 13 pages APPLY IN THIS CASE?-Title VII of The Civil Rights Act of 1964-Case of HISHON V. KING AND SPALDING (437 U.S. 69)-Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine (450 U.S. 248)4. LIST OF OBSERVATIONSThe case HISHON V. KING AND SPALDING (437 U.S. 69) was a very important case with regards to this one. Specifically within the ruling the courts stated "Even if respondent is correct in its assertion that a partnership invitation is not itself an offer of

The Sabinian v The Proculean School of Roman Law

4468 words - 18 pages (1946) The Institutes of Gaius: Part 1 Text With Critical Notes and Translation, Oxford: Clarendon PressZulueta, F De (1953) The Institutes of Gaius: Part 2 Commentary, Oxford: Clarendon PressDumbreck v Addie 1929 SC (HL) 51Note on translation: All translations are my own unless otherwise cited. TG Leesen (2009) Gaius Meets Cicero: Law and Rhetoric in The School Disputes p1 Pomponius uses the term "diversas sectas" (different sects) at D.1.2.2.47

The Arizona v. Fulminante Case

1769 words - 7 pages , the Supreme Court voted 5 to 4 to uphold the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision: Fulminante would receive a new trial and the confession would not be allowed; this would be for future law reference. The Supreme Court, profoundly, ruled that a coerced confession could not account as evidence against the person being tried (“Arizona v. Fulminante”. Lawschool). Arizona v. Fulminante was one of the few cases in law history with justices shifting from

Riggs V. Palmer Critaically Evalute The Legal Case Of Riggs V. Palmer

950 words - 4 pages flaw. There are laws who's moral intention's are lost in translation, and there are laws which apply to almost every persons sensibility but have not yet been written. There are few people who would read the case of Riggs v. Palmer who would be on the side of Mr. Palmer, crossing their fingers in hopes that he receives the money, but the fact remains that a law is not a law until it has been written. In the late 1800's when this case took place

Similar Essays

The Treat Of V Essay

1434 words - 6 pages countries, they did not get out of World War One easily and had a difficult time once all the countries started to come together to figure out a post-war plan. When the representatives came together in Paris, all of the wars destruction was blamed on Germany and that was taken into account when they were creating the Treaty of Versailles. Woodrow Wilson, the president of the United States, showed his strong views through the writing of his

The Case Of Mitchell V. Wisconsin

2986 words - 12 pages generally been interpreted to protect the thoughts, as well as thespeech, of an individual (Cacas, 338). According to the Court'smajority opinion in Wooley v. Maynard, a 1977 case, "At the heart ofthe First Amendment is the notion that an individual should be free tobelieve as he will, and that in a free society one's beliefs should beshaped by his mind and his conscience rather than coerced by thestate."Another componet of Mitchell's First

The Case Of Marbury V. Madison

1154 words - 5 pages mandamus compelling the new Secretary of State James Madison to deliver the appointment. The case involved several questions the Supreme Court had to answer. The first question was whether or not Marbury had a right to the commission. The Court decided that he did have the right because the appointment was issued while Adams was still in office and took effect as soon as it was signed. The next question was to determine if the law gave

Abortion: The Case Of Rove V. Wade

1180 words - 5 pages It’s been a major social issue since the 1970’s and the case of Roe v. Wade. Over the years, abortion has been argued from both standpoints, for the unborn babies and against the denying of women’s rights to control their own bodies. Though some say it should be legal, the act of abortion should be illegal because the process can be considered murder, people take advantage of the option and abuse the system, and it can be a health risk to a