This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Unanimous Verdict Vs. Majority Rules Verdicts

901 words - 4 pages

The use of a jury is the traditional method within the common law for deciding the facts in any dispute between parties. The role of a jury is to determine question of fact. The jury is in a powerful method because ultimately, it determines whether a person is guilty or innocent. In civil cases, the main function of the jury is to find the facts having regard to the evidence, and assess damages. The number of jurors used in a civil trial is less than that used in a criminal trial. Another important difference is that the verdict does not have to be unanimous, meaning that a judge will accept a majority decision of a civil jury.Unanimity has long been considered as essential and fundamental part of jury trials. Unanimous decisions refer to the nature of the decision reached by a jury. All jury members must be in agreement as to the innocence or guilt of the accused in criminal cases or as to the liability of the defendant in civil cases. Where all are in agreement, the verdict is said to be unanimous. A unanimous verdict must be given in a criminal proceedings involving treason or murder. In all other criminal offences a majority decision out of twelve, will be accepted.Unanimity not only ensures that the minority viewpoint is heard, it gives people in the minority a vote of value, and hence enhances the representative character of the jury by ensuring the participation by individual citizens on the jury is real rather than illusionary. If a unanimous verdict is achieved, then in theory it corresponds to the level of proof required- in criminal offences being beyond reasonable doubt. Finally, the requirement of unanimous verdict ensures that the representative character and the collective nature of the jury are carried forward into the definitive verdict.On the other hand, there is a requirement of unanimity in jury decisions which creates delays in decisions and increases the cost of trials. When a jury cannot reach a unanimous decision it will be discharged and a new trial ordered, and as a result, substantial costs and expenses are often incurred due to the often-increased length of time that juries deliberate. In addition, there is sometimes one juror with radical/diverse views that causes disagreement amongst other jurors, and will refuse to take any other factors into account, and as a result, a retrial is ordered in which is an unwanted burden on the state and the accused person.In a case where a civil jury is not able to reach a unanimous verdict, it is permitted to return a majority decision. In criminal cases, a majority verdict requires at least ten out of twelve jurors, or...

Find Another Essay On Unanimous Verdict vs. Majority Rules Verdicts

The landmark case of Marbury v. Madison

590 words - 2 pages unanimous decision of 4-0. However, there were many people who criticized this case. They calmed that Madison should have received the legal right to follow the presidents orders.This case was very important because it showed how the court system could function without any major flaws. They were able to decide on a verdict and allow the punishment to be carried out accordingly. This showed Americans that the Supreme Court had the power to make

Trial Process Essay

2369 words - 10 pages the defendant again at a later date with a new panel of jurors or the prosecution can decide to not pursue a new trial. If the jury does come to an agreement and it is determined not to be a hung jury we can move on to the verdict. Once the deliberation has concluded and assuming the jurors were able to either come to a unanimous decision or a majority vote a verdict can be revealed. Depending on the charges, the jury notifies the judge they

The Criminal Procedure

860 words - 3 pages jury that is unable to agree on whether to convict or acquit is called a hung jury. In some states the jury must be unanimous in their verdict, whereas other states permit less than unanimous verdicts in some cases. If the jury is unable to reach a verdict, the defendant, not having been acquitted, may be retried later before another jury. A retrial following a hung jury does not violate the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against double jeopardy

'Consider what you think are the key aims of a criminal trial and explain, with reasons, the extent to which you think the Crown Court or magistrates’

1689 words - 7 pages within the magistrate’s verdicts; a shoplifter’s sentence would simply depend on which magistrates heard their case. Fortune is not justice, but the Lawrence’s study would have us believe that this is the case with regards to the magistracy. However, the study is perhaps unreliable because it only examined seven magistrates across two courts. A much wider range of data would be required to prove that this was the case for the majority of

Magistrates

7055 words - 28 pages threat of "nobbling", and although it is arguable that if two jurors favour acquittal then the prosecution have hardly proved their case "beyond reasonable doubt", some 20 per cent of convictions after trial nowadays arise from majority verdicts. If the evidence is legally insufficient the judge may direct the jury to return a verdict of "not guilty", and in exceptional circumstances he may direct a verdict of "guilty", but

Court Proceedings

3296 words - 13 pages determine the fact - whether the defendant is guilty of the charge on the basis of evidence. The jury will be told by the judge that it is their duty to seek to arrive at a unanimous verdict. Majority verdicts have been possible since 1967, but are only acceptable when the jury have been deliberating for a long period and have been directed by the judge that a majority verdict is acceptable. The judge will stress however

Leroy Reed Verdict

708 words - 3 pages to reflect community’s values and beliefs of what is justice, there are no penalties for nullifying, the verdict of the case could lead to the law being altered or overturned, and the jury make verdicts on a case by case basis instead of convicting the defendant just on the crime they committed. The cons of the jury nullifying are that the verdicts vary by case because they make verdicts on a case by case basis, bias from sympathy is likely to

special needs prisoner

1400 words - 6 pages in seclusion and must be unanimous if determining guilt.At the beginning of deliberations the jury is required to select a foreman. This person is to be a leader figure for the jury in order to help their deliberations proceed smoothly. This may include settling disputes opinion or verifying matters of law from a qualified source such as the judge. The foreman is also tasked with reading the verdicts of the accused to the courtroom after the

The Scottsboro Trials

2124 words - 9 pages Powell vs. Alabama the Supreme Court’s vote was at seven to two. Therefore, majority rules that the case be retried. The majority opinion stated that the defendants were denied of their right in the Fourteenth Amendment. They believed the defendants were not given fit legal counsels by Alabama. After the Supreme Court stated that there was a mistrial in Powell vs. Alabama, then there had to be a retrial. The ILD hired Samuel Leibowits to serve as the

Psychology of the Courtroom

2505 words - 10 pages bow to the pressure and go with the majority view. The pressure on an individual (or number of individuals) to conform is important because in most countries (with the exception of England and Wales in certain cases) juries are required to give a unanimous verdict. Whilst the trial judge will ask if a unanimous verdict has been reached he/she will not ask how this decision was arrived at. The fact that the privacy of the

Abusing the Force

1240 words - 5 pages media market. The jury comprises of ten white persons, one Hispanic person, and one Asian person, with no African Americans. Whereas, the jury renders its verdicts, finding the accused not guilty of all charges. The Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department came out three months later documenting the systematic use of excessive force and racial harassment in the LAPD. If the beating was not purely racial, it still reflects

Similar Essays

Majority Verdicts In Australia Essay

1420 words - 6 pages The role of the jury is to determine innocence or guilt of defendant based on the evidence given in court. The requirement 12 people must find the defendant guilty beyond reasonable doubt has existed in law since the 14th century. In the past 12 jurors had to reach a unanimous verdict which was often difficult to achieve because of rogue jurors. It was inefficient in terms of time and tax payer money. Majority verdicts have been debated

Insisting Equality Essay

1965 words - 8 pages . One juror decided to stand up and take the time out for proper reasoning that resulted in teaching the others two jurors a lesson. Final verdicts should be made on justifiable grounds or the foundation of America’s society could be left at risk for collapse. Justifiable final verdicts are skewed when people follow the majority and that appeared to be a problem in the beginning of the play. The three jurors that stood out for their realism were

Law In Action Essay

1206 words - 5 pages evolved to a new justice system. England for example have introduced where juries try to reach a unanimous decision within 2 hours and if that isn’t achievable it is a majority verdict of 10/12. A downside to abolishing unanimous verdicts is that juries are supposed to make their decision of beyond reasonable doubt but the majority vote means that there is some reasonable doubt within the jury. Another country that has moved on from the jury

What Effects Does Social Pressure Have On Jury Decisions?

833 words - 4 pages dealing with jury decision making. This is when the desire to be unanimous overrides the desire to make fair, rational comments about the decision. This is when minority views are repressed so that no conflict arises.However, Moscovici (1976) found that small groups and individuals can effect the majority vote, although this is usually when there is a longer time of deliberation. A minority has a better chance of influencing a group if:R They are