United Nations Security Council Is Unsuccessful in Keeping Peace
The threat of a nuclear attack on the USA has become a common topic after terrorist attacks on September 11. A lot of people have been talking about a missile defense system for the US. With the kinds of terrorist attacks being executed today, who knows what will come next. Some people worry that next time it will be a nuke knocking on Uncle Sam's door instead of a few misguided Al-Queda pilots flying bombs. Did you know that there actually is a protection agency out there who's task is to keep peace in the world? It is hard to tell because they are not successful very often, and more times than not they come to the US for aid, instead of providing it. This agency is called the United Nations Security Council, and it isn't doing its job.
The United Nations was founded on the twenty-fourth of October, 1945 by 51 countries that were tired of war and wanted peace. The UN has four major purposes: to maintain international peace and security, to develop friendly relations among nations, to promote human rights and remedy international problems, and to be a center for nations to negotiate. At the UN, all Member States of every size, class, and political viewpoint have a say. Five of the main components of the United Nations including the Security Council are based at UN headquarters in New York. There are 15 Council members of which the five permanent members are China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Security Council is primarily responsible for keeping peace. The council convenes at any time that peace is threatened. The council always tries to correct problems peacefully before it takes militant measures. It sends peacekeeping missions and attempts to secure a ceasefire. If these fail the council can impose sanctions and weapons embargos. Very rarely the council actually does force the offender to back off through military might, even going as far as to authorize "any means necessary" to quell violence (United).
This all sounds perfect, but what is United Nations really accomplishing today? Is the UN still able to cope in the twenty-first century? Recently, Rob Watson interviewed Mr. Richard Holbrooke, the United States ambassador to the UN. In the interview Mr. Holbrooke criticized the command structure and communications of the UN and insisted that the peacekeeping department needed a militant foundation to enforce its decisions. Mr. Holbrooke said that the department is "stretched to the bone" with only 400 New York based staff (Watson). With the proper funding and the trained personnel it badly needs, the UNs peacekeeping department could quickly shape into an effective unit.
Right now, though, the UN can not possibly cope with the many current problems throught the world. Israel is bombing Palestine, the US is trying to recover from terrorist attacks, while bombing Afghanistan sense-less, and Africa is still torn by...