This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

North American Free Trade Agreement: Nafta

1615 words - 6 pages

North American Free Trade Agreement: NAFTA

Introduction

     I believe that the North American Free Trade Agreement was an inevitable
step in the evolution of the United States economic policy. The globilization
of the world economy due to technological advances in computers and
communications have shrunk the world to the point where no single country acting
alone can effectively compete on the foreign market. Even the United States,
with its vast resources, can not have an absolute advantage in all thing that it
produces. It does not have unlimited factors of endowments and must do its best
to make these available to the companies within its borders.
     There are two basic sides to the argument over the North American Free
Trade Agreement. The Pro-NAFTA side views the treaty as a way to provide a
large, efficient production base for the entire geopolitical area. This would
result in lower cost to consumers and an increase in exports to Mexico and
Canada. The multiplier effect would then take place producing growth in all
areas. The Anti-NAFTA group feels that Mexico will be an unequal partner due
to the lower wage rates of the Mexican populace, causing the loss of
thousands of jobs in the United States and Canada. Environmentalist fear that
pollution will spread across the continent. Farmers fear that produce grown in
Mexico will be contaminated from pesticides banned in the United States. These
are but a few of the arguments for and against NAFTA.

What does NAFTA mean

     A Free Trade Area is, by definition, an area where all barriers to trade
are lifted. This is not the case with regards to NAFTA at this point.
Currently most of the trade barriers between the United States and Canada are
lifted but those with Mexico have largely been kept in place. This is an
obvious disparity on the part of the Mexican government but is due largely to
the proportional loss of income to the governments in each country. The Gross
Domestic Product per individual in Mexico is one seventh of the other two
countries. Therefore, the loss of revenue would have a major impact on the
daily life of its population and the operation of the government . Never before
has a major economic power like the United States considered a free trade area
with an under-developed third world country.
The major difference between a Free Trade Area and Common Market is
that a Free Trade Area primarily deals with trade, while a Common Market has
this in addition to no barriers on factors of production and a common external
trade policy.
While on the surface it seems that a free trade area would always be a
good thing, it is easier said then done. The majority of people that oppose
NAFTA do so because of the potential for loss of employment. Mexico with its
cheap work force, will tend to make manufactures requiring extensive manual
labor more likely to move to the lower cost area. A loss of sovereignty may...

Find Another Essay On North American Free Trade Agreement: Nafta

The Negative Effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement

1211 words - 5 pages The Negative Effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement In January 1994, the United States, Mexico, and Canada implemented the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), forming the largest free trade zone in the world. The goal of NAFTA is to create better trading conditions through tariff reduction, removal of investment barriers, and improvement of intellectual property protection. NAFTA continues to gradually reduce

Central American Free Trade Agreement Essay

782 words - 3 pages the United States, more than 750,000 manufacturing jobs have been lost since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and were replaced by low-wage service jobs. Working conditions in Mexico have deteriorated substantially with the maquila (sweatshops) sector as the primary source of new jobs: the median salary has lost 23% of its purchasing power, and 8 million more Mexican families live in poverty than before NAFTA went into effect. Not

Has the North American Free Trade Agreement Hurt the American Economy?

1005 words - 4 pages taking advantage of Mexico’s free trade agreement with the U.S. (Bethel University, 2006). Perched in his ivory tower and arguing for the defense of NAFTA is Daniel T. Griswold, who takes the view that NAFTA was both “an economic and foreign policy success” (Bethel University, 2006, p.286). Amazingly, in my view, Griswold takes the position that “NAFTA was more about foreign policy than about the domestic economy. Its biggest payoff…has been

The European Union (EU) vs the North American Free Trade Agreement

3368 words - 13 pages services coming into the union. The EU evolved from the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), which was formed in 1951 as a response to the First and Second World Wars to try to ensure future peace in Europe. This became the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1965, which in turn became the European Union in 1992 following the signing of the Maastricht Treaty. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has brought economic growth and

Free Trade Agreement (FTA)

1093 words - 4 pages systems of FTA. The NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement); this began on Jan. 1, 1994. This agreement will remove most barriers to trade investment among the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Under NAFTA, all non-tariff barriers to agricultural trade between the United States and Mexico were eliminated. In addition, many tariffs were eliminated immediately, with others being phase out over periods of 5 to 15 years. Although U.S

Free Trade Agreement

2785 words - 11 pages as North- American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA), U.S.- Singapore Free Trade Agreement (USSFTA), etc. Specifically, one of the longest standing of FTA is existing between Australia and New Zealand (ANZCER) - more than 20 years, known as the "Closer Economic Relationship" delivering economic benefits to both countries. Then Australia also has concluded two FTAs with Asian trading partners in

European Union and the North American Free Trade

3022 words - 12 pages /law-and-ethics/similarities-differences-nafta-european-union-main-similarity-agreements-involve-single-approach-trade-countries-illustrate-explain/. [Accessed 01 December 2013 http://www.naftanow.org . 2013. North American Free Trade Agreement | The Agreement | NAFTANow.org. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.naftanow.org/agreement/default_en.asp. [Accessed 03 December 2013] http://www.oxfam.org. 2008. Regional Trade Agreements. [ONLINE] Available

Implications and Issues of the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement

3374 words - 13 pages to date suggests there has been little diversion and that FTAs and regional agreements have been effective in encouraging wider trade liberalisation. A study of the impact of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2000) concluded that there was no evidence that the agreement had had diversionary effects. According to Professor Krueger (1999), the bulk of Mexican products that increased output/exports

A Free-Trade Agreement Between the US and Europe

1745 words - 7 pages a main buyer. After a tariff reclassification in 1999, the Chilean price band system (PBS) resulted in higher customs duties of up to 64.41%, thus violating the limit set at 31.5%. As a result, this issue was submitted to the WTO . c) U.S and Europe A free-trade agreement between the United States and Europe has been elusive for years. However, with the recent election of President Barack Obama in 2012, European Leaders like Angela Merkel and

The WTO role in the Australia and US free trade agreement

1925 words - 8 pages trade barriers should be applied, on a most-favoured nation basis, to all WTO members. This means that no WTO member should be discriminated against by another member's trade regime (DFAT 2004).In recent years there has been a pursuit of bilateral and regional trade agreements. Among the most well known include The European Union (EU)The European Free Trade Association (EFTA), The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), The Southern Common

Question: "A bilateral free trade agreement between the USA and Australia is likely to be of only marginal benefit to Australian businesses." Evaluate this statement

2145 words - 9 pages A Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between Australia and the United States of America (USA) appears to present a unique opportunity to advance the interests of Australian business. However, to what extent would free trade benefit Australia? An FTA superficially seems to offer significant benefits to Australia in terms of employment and the expansion of Australian business internationally. However, major market access barriers face Australian exporters

Similar Essays

North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta)

2079 words - 9 pages NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (NAFTA) Brief Overview: NAFTA, The North American Free Trade Agreement, came into existence on January 1, 1994. NAFTA is essentially a free-trade agreement between the 3 North American nations of the Unites States, Canada, and Mexico. The major thought behind this treaty was to give the citizens and the companies of the North American nations many incentives to trade between themselves. The duties on U.S

Regional Analysis: North American Free Trade Agreement

1527 words - 6 pages Regional Analysis: North American Free Trade Agreement In today's globalized economies, virtually every country in the world belongs to some form of regional integrated trade organization whether by direct membership, bilateral or multilateral agreement. Regional integration is a process by which sovereign states in a particular region enter into an agreement to promote economic growth through the reduction of barriers to trade restrictions

The North American Free Trade Agreement

3714 words - 15 pages , this is held to be an absolute truth. Though free trade is undoubtedly the most effective form of commerce between countries from a purely economic standpoint, increasingly we find that our so-called "free trade agreements" are horribly unbalanced. Indicative of these fiascoes is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). NAFTA is a lopsided and detrimental deal, hastily hammered out by an inexperienced group of American negotiators under

Marketing Of Honda Motorcycles In The Usa The North Americam Free Trade Agreement (Nafta)

2020 words - 8 pages . Unfortuneatly, despite the solidity that our economy is so often associated with, we have accumulated a 5 trillion dollar (that's 9 zeros) national debt. Something has to be done about this colossal problem to ensure that the United States retains its status as a world power in the global economy. One vital catalyst to help promote growth and neutralize the massive account deficit and foreign debts is the North American Free Trade Agreement. NAFTA, for