United States V. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft’s Abusive Practices Towards Becoming A Monopoly

988 words - 4 pages

History of the Microsoft Corporation
The Microsoft Corporation American is a multinational corporation that is based in Redmond, Washington, that specializes in developing, manufacturing, licensing, supporting and selling software for computers. It is probably best known for producing software such as the Microsoft Windows line of operating systems and it web browser Internet Explorer. Its leading hardware products include the line of Xbox gaming consoles. Microsoft is currently the largest software maker in the world in terms of revenue and for this reason it is also one of the most valuable companies in the world.

The company was created by childhood friends Bill Gates and Paul Allen on ...view middle of the document...

They have also come into the PC production market for the first time, with the introduction of a line of tablet computers called Microsoft Surface.
Steve Ballmer and Bill Gates
Steve Ballmer and Bill Gates are two very important people in the Microsoft Corporation. Ballmer is the current CEO, while Gates, the founder of Microsoft, is the current chairman. Steve Ballmer hails from Detroit, Michigan where he took part in engineering classes at Lawrence Technological University while still in high school and also scored a perfect score on the math part of the SAT. He graduated from Harvard with a degree in applied mathematics and economics, where he met Bill Gates. Afterward he went onto to work for Procter & Gamble and attended graduate school at Stanford before teaming up with Bill Gates at Microsoft as a business manager in 1980. (Microsoft News Center)
While at Microsoft, Ballmer led numerous Microsoft divisions, overseeing the operations team, the operating systems development division, and sales and support. From 1992 and onwards he was Executive Vice President of Sales and Support. Ballmer ran Microsoft's development of the .NET Framework before being named as the President of Microsoft in 1998. In 2000 he was made CEO where he was in charge company finances and daily operations while Gates remained chairman and chief software architect still had total control of Microsoft’s vision for the future. Gates gave up his day-to-day activities when he stepped down as chief software architect in 2006, but stayed on as chairman. This allowed Ballmer to make major personnel changes in the Microsoft division he thought needed revamped. Since taking over as CEO, Ballmer has played a large part in the increase of Microsoft’s annual revenue going from $25 billion to $70 billion. He also shifted up the focus from a PC first mentality to focus on other products like the Xbox and Skype. Ballmer has announced he will step down from his position as CEO in 2014 and a board of directors including Bill...

Find Another Essay On United States v. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft’s Abusive Practices Towards Becoming a Monopoly

Korematsu V. United States Essay

1016 words - 4 pages order was a direct response to the Pearl Harbor bombing that took place in 1941. However a Japanese American man by the name of Fred Korematsu did not follow the Presidential order but instead challenged the order saying it violated the 5th Amendment. He was arrested for violating the order and taken to court.The ruling of the case was 6-3 leaning towards the United States. The reason behind the decision was that although Korematsu was correct in

Korematsu v. United States Essay

1257 words - 6 pages In the landmark case of Korematsu v. United States the Supreme Court was correct in the ruling because the executive order that was issued became a law to protect the country from persons that had close ethnic ties to the enemy and made all people that the government deemed a threat to national security into prisoners. Although this was against moral standards, it was a necessity at the time to protect the country. While it may seem that it

Korematsu v. United States

1050 words - 4 pages yellow race." (pg., 89). In 1943 a student Gordon Hirabayashi disobeyed a report for evacuation and curfew. Hirabayashi v. United States (1943), was the first judicial test of the statute that was signed into law by Franklin Roosevelt to make it a crime to remain in a military zone, that was put to use towards an American citizen. Hirabayashi was convicted of both counts, evacuation and curfew, in Federal District Court. In the Court of

Ohio V. United States

627 words - 3 pages compelling the accused to be a witness against himself.” Then, the court reasoned that the search was unreasonable “ab initio” and it makes it a violation of the fourth amendment. Justice Black mentioned in his concurrence that if something is obtained illegally, it cannot be used again the appellant. The Boyd’s case was not the only case mentioned in the Mapp v. Ohio opinion. Additionally, Weeks v. United States (1914) was a case that

United States v Jones

577 words - 3 pages Citation: United States v Jones/ United States courts of Appeals/ District of Columbia, 2012/132 S. Ct. 945 Facts: In 2004, the FBI initiated an investigation on Jones and other associates for a possible drug trafficking. During the investigation FBI agents obtained a warrant authorizing them to install a Global Positioning System tracking device on a Jeep, Jones used regularly. The warrant allowed agent to install the tracking device within

United States Patent Office as a Government Corporation

3042 words - 12 pages The United States Patent Office (“USPTO”) faces criticism from its users and legislators that the timeliness of the patent process and ultimate quality of issued patents are inadequate. In order to address this criticism Congress made several changes to the authorities of the USPTO in the last decade and considered more changes in 2009. Nevertheless, problems persist and some stakeholders argue that reorganizing the USPTO as a government


2148 words - 9 pages The United States Constitution states “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” (Quoted from a transcript of the US Constitution).The main purpose of the U.S

Olmstead V. United States (1928)

688 words - 3 pages Olmstead v. United States (1928) Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Taft Vote: 5-4 Case reached Supreme Court by writ of certiorari. Facts:      The evidence in the records discloses a conspiracy of amazing magnitude to import, possess, and sell liquor unlawfully. Involved were not less than fifty employees, two sea-going vessels for transportation of the goods to British Columbia, a ranch beyond the city limits of

Case: Olmstead v. United States

745 words - 3 pages Olmstead v. United States (1928)Opinion delivered by Chief Justice TaftVote: 5-4Case reached Supreme Court by writ of certiorari.Facts:The evidence in the records discloses a conspiracy of amazing magnitude to import, possess, and sell liquor unlawfully. Involved were not less than fifty employees, two sea-going vessels for transportation of the goods to British Columbia, a ranch beyond the city limits of Seattle with a large underground cache

World War II: Korematsu v. United States

605 words - 2 pages The Supreme Court decision in Korematsu v. United States (December 1944) approved internment of Japanese Americans on a claim of " Military necessity"- the possibility of a Japanese attack on America's West Coast. The war power of congress and the executive to exclude those of Japanese ancestry from the west coast war area in which one's home is located is a far greater deprivation than constant confinement to the home from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m

Mandatory Vaccination in the United States: A Past and Present Examination of Jacobson v Massachusetts

1350 words - 6 pages constitutional, and consequently, Mr. Jacobson was in violation of the law and required to pay the original $5 fine. Ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and address the question, “[is the state’s] statute, so construed, therefore, inconsistent with the liberty which the Constitution of the United States secures to every person against deprivation by the state” (3). In other words, the Court examined the notion of a state’s

Similar Essays

United States V. Microsoft Essay

1224 words - 5 pages Charges raised by US Government against MicrosoftIn 1998, a case was filed by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and twenty US States against Microsoft. The charges which were raised against Microsoft were:- That Microsoft Violated of section 2 of Sherman Act by engaging in monopolization through a series of anticompetitive acts designed mainly to maintain its monopoly power (The acts related with web browsers and Java). Section 2 of

Antitrust Laws And Whether Or Not Microsoft Is A Monopoly. Usa V. Microsoft Plus Bibliography

1074 words - 4 pages antitrust suit brought against them by the United States District Court. USA v. Microsoft April 2000. By the early 90s, Microsoft had gained a dominant position in the software industry by creating Windows, the first commercially feasible graphical operating system that could be used on computers. But in the mid 90=s, Gates realized that the Internet represented the next step in the ongoing computer revolution; so, he created a business plan to

United States Steel Corporation Essay

6207 words - 25 pages economía de escala, no por que la empresa produzca más, su producto será más barato.2. Lista de hechos relevantesAntecedentesUSS se formó en el año 1901, como la United States Steel Corporation.Cuando la empresa se formó controlaba el 65% de todo el mercado de acero en forma primaria en los Estados Unidos.USS era una empresa totalmente integrada, ellos se autoabastecían de hierro, carbón

Schenck V. United States: A Federal Crime

1938 words - 8 pages Do you know that notifying your fellow Americans of their constitutional rights was a Federal crime? Well it was during World War One (WWI). In the case Schenck v. the United States, schenck tried to remind his fellow Americans of their constitutional rights and also let them know that the draft was being used as a form of militarized slavery. This case contained men who his right was taken away after he tried to get the military draftees to