College Athletes: Amateurs Or Full Time Employees

2546 words - 11 pages

Ever since college students started playing sports, back in 1879 when Harvard played Yale in the first collegiate sports game, the question of whether college athletes should be paid was addressed. From that point on athletes, coaches, and college administrators have brought forward points agreeing or disagreeing with the notion of paying college students. The students argue that they deserve to be paid due to the revenue that they bring for the college and because of the games they play and the championships they win. At first the idea of paying college athletes was out of the question, but now the argument has gone from a simple yes or no to a heated debate. Since college athletes are given a free education, they should not also be paid.
This argument has reached its peak of debate when Northwestern University football players planned to form a union in order to receive some form of representation. Northwestern quarterback, Kain Colter, started this movement when he reached out to the President of the National College Players Association, Ramogi Huma. He said, “This is about finally giving college athletes a seat at the table. Athletes deserve an equal voice when it comes to their physical, academic, and financial protections” ( Farrey). Huma filed a petition to the office of the National Labor Relations board on behalf of the players of Northwestern. Besides this being the first move towards a labor union in college sports what’s important is that the athletes of Northwestern are not seeking unionization due to mistreatment by Northwestern. According to Colter, “The school is just playing by the rules of their governing body, the NCAA.” Also, this isn’t about just helping players at Northwestern. Colter expressed how he wants to support players from other colleges in the country. He and other Northwestern players believe that the NCAA is to blame for this lack of representation. In other words, the alleged argument isn’t between the players and the college but between the players and the NCAA. **make clear who is making this argument
Although Colter’s move seems supported by numerous people, one of the major flaws with their argument involves the value of education. Dennis Johnson, author of Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes, acknowledges that there is a growing fear about the notion of paying college athletes. He explains, “The fear of the NCAA, as it should be, is that the mere notion of paying college athletes undermines the university’s primary purpose—education, something far more valuable than a modest annual stipend proposed by many.” Also, one other popular decision with college athletes is studying one year and then moving into professional sports. Many people believe that athletes who only study for one year are not taking advantage of the gift that was given to them. Donald Remy, an NCAA Chief Legal Officer explains that college athletes might miss important opportunities. He says, “athletes attend college as a...

Find Another Essay On College Athletes: Amateurs or Full Time Employees

Student or Athlete: The Age Old Question of Paying College Athletes

1613 words - 6 pages more athletes full scholarships to play, from the plethora of ‘TV money’ the schools obtain. On the other hand, I do not agree with the ideas that justify paying these college athletes. They came to college to learn and only play basketball if both time and grades could allow. In his essay, “Why Sports Matter”, Wilfrid Sheed states: “All of these tortures are considered so much part of the college experience that you actually pay the place to

College Athletes Should be Compensated Essay

1393 words - 6 pages . Another reason that keeping a player in college is a good idea is because of maturity. Often players enter the pros too early when they are not physically or mentally ready. Keeping them in school for the full ride would give them much more time to mature as athletes. It would make them much better players when entering the pros, hence making the league full of higher caliber athletes. This would increase production and excitement in the big

paying college athletes

1280 words - 6 pages Pell Grants which enables them to buy extra necessities if needed. Being an athlete is a full time job. On the regular day a player will wake up before classes and go to a required workout session, go to class until 2 or 3 p.m., go to practice, then attend mandatory study hall, and then finish homework or study for a test. So basically an athlete does more mental work and physical work than most human beings. USA today states “If we want to reward

How Much Is Too Much?

918 words - 4 pages An amateur is one who pursues an activity for pleasure instead of material gain (Morehead 33). A professional is one who engages in a sport for pay (Morehead 567). The definition of an amateur and a professional has one key difference: the word pay. Should student athletes be paid to play their sports? College athletes are amateurs who are playing a sport in which they have limited big time stage playing experience. College athletes are not

Should College Athletes be Paid?

1540 words - 6 pages considered the best on the team and probably were given a full ride scholarship to play and attend the school. But for example, a role player or a bench player who does not play at all would probably be paid a lot less than a star player. In retrospective, college athletes should not be considered employees, but only as students. In conclusion, everyone has an opinion on if student athletes should be paid or not. The people for athletes to be

Time To Pay Them

2184 words - 9 pages athlete. They can’t stop this act from happening because NCAA rules prevent them from interfering with such an act of profiting because their considered just amateurs. The third reason for pay for play is. College athletes need extra money because of their financial troubles and lack of money to afford other essential needs. College athletes also need compensation because of ineffective or incomplete scholarships. Kenneth Cooper a newspaper

Should College Athletes Be Paid?

1754 words - 8 pages spent a little under 40 hours a week on their academics. College athletes spend more time training and playing their sport than they do actually studying or doing school related activities. Since athletes are dedicating so much time and effort into their sports, they need to be looked at and considered as employees, not student athletes, especially knowing the fact that they spend more time doing it than an somebody who is paid to do something

The current system of collegiate athletics and the NCAA

2615 words - 11 pages maintained. Mitten, Matthew J., "Applying Antitrust Law to NCAA Regulation of “Big Time” College Athletics: The Need to Shift From Nostalgic 19th and 20th Century Ideals of Amateurism to the Economic Realities of the 21st Century" (2000). Faculty Publications. Paper 166 http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/facpub/166 According to the NCAA, “student-athletes shall be amateurs in an intercollegiate sport, and their participation should be motivated

College athletes deserve to be paid

1302 words - 6 pages also cheated out of income that the universities receive for all of the hard work that the athletes do. Bringing up Alabama again they earned total revenue of $124.5 million in the year of 2013 before New Year’s Day. Alabama’s tuition is about 14,000 dollars. This is a major difference and truly explains how College universities “Give Athletes Free Education” is not remotely equal at all. “Being a College athlete is a full time Job” (Lynn

College Athletes Deserve to Get Paid Discussion

1517 words - 6 pages , they have curfews, they get shortened holiday breaks. They have practices, games playbooks they have to master. A regular student athlete schedule consists of a full twelve hour day sounds like a full time job to me. The typical division one college football player devotes 43.3 hours per week to his sport 3.3 more hours than the typical American average work week (Edelman“21 Reasons Why Student-Athletes Are Employees and Should Be Allowed to

Should College Athletes Be Paid?

2573 words - 10 pages about school thus focus more on football or basketball. This can be bad because since these players would be getting paid regardless why go to class. This would sound very appealing to many athletes, collecting checks and practicing while not worrying about class because in reality many of these athletes go to college to have a chance in the professionals and make millions, so by paying them now in college it would just be giving them a head

Similar Essays

College Amateurs Athletes Essay

2606 words - 10 pages maintained that its student-athletes are amateurs within their respected sports. The NCAA continually maintains that these athletes need to be recognized as students first. But in the college sports industry this is not the case. The NCAA exploits these “students” through their contribution to the universities, conferences, and the entire NCAA institution. Looking into the life of a student-athlete, the student aspect is very much neglected. This

Organizational Commitment Of Part Time And Full Time Employees

2924 words - 12 pages in general shows mixed results. Some researchers have found that part-time workers are less committed to and satisfied with their jobs than full-time workers (Lee & Johnson, 1991; Miller & Terborg, 1979; and Morrow, McElroy, & Elliott, 1994). Other researchers have determined that part-time employees are more committed than full-time employees (Eberhardt & Shani, 1984; Jackofsky & Peters, 1987; and Schaubroeck, Judge, &amp

It’s Time To Pay College Athletes

2352 words - 9 pages put in eliminate any semblance of college life,”(par. 23). Besides their time these athletes are sacrificing their bodies every time they step onto the court, field, or track. Some of them are athletes who will be worth millions of dollars in their future for some their body is what will support them financially for their whole life. These are huge risks made by all of these athletes and they deserve more than the scholarship and benefits they are

Should College Athletes Be Payed Or Not?

1526 words - 6 pages College athletes now-a-days are getting paid to play like its a job. Although, do they deserve the pay they get or even the pay at all? College athletes do not deserve to be paid because the point of college is to get an education, not a “camp” before the pros. It has been statistically proven that out of all the Division 1 sports teams, only 45% of them are actually allowed to graduate. Colleges need to focus on the “athletic-students” now