Utilitarianism And Kant's Moral. Essay

719 words - 3 pages

The utilitarianism principle states that we should do what produces the most happiness for the greatest number of people. With this in mind, we would be able to make a sound decision based on the amount of happiness it brings to others. To speak of it as a consequential moral theory means you are focusing more on the actual outcome of your actions and not the reason behind doing them. An example would be the suicide barrier mentioned in chapter four. Suppose that some of the people supporting the idea of building the suicide barrier were the people that are going to get paid and make profit when it is built, hence the reason they support it so strongly. Just because they make a large profit off the erection of the suicide barrier doesn't mean they are wrong, they still are possibly saving people's lives no matter what their motives for building the barrier may be. So, while the reason behind the want may not be as ethical, the results are the same no matter what.My only objection to the utilitarianism concept is that while it may make the mass majority of the group happy with the situation, what about the rest of them that don't agree? Suppose that two thirds of the community were strong supporters of building a suicide barrier, stating that it would save people's lives by not making it so easy to jump off. On the other hand, the remaining third of the community state that if someone wants to commit suicide then they are going to find a way no matter what kind of barriers you put up. Instead of wasting the money on a suicide barrier, they would rather spend that money on a new school or road repairs. That still leaves a large group of people, although not the largest, unhappy with the situations outcome. However, in utilitarianism's defense, there really is no sure way of fixing this type of argument. No matter what you do, not everyone is going to be happy with a single decision.I...

Find Another Essay On Utilitarianism and Kant's Moral.

Outline and evaluate what you consider to be the most powerful objection to Utilitarianism as a moral theory

1074 words - 4 pages Consequentialist theorists propose that our only duty should be to do whatever has the best consequences. Utilitarianism, the most popular of consequentialist theories, was formulated by Jeremy Bentham (1789) and later refined by John Stuart Mill (1861). In general terms, classical utilitarianism states that we should do whatever maximises the balance of pleasure over pain for everyone affected by our action. This is a modern conception of

Society Must be Governed by Rules

1719 words - 7 pages -- which action will create the most good for the most people. However, Kant's deontological ethics focuses on the importance of rules. Kant established the categorical imperative, or a strict moral rule that holds in all cases. This is somewhat similar to Rule Utilitarianism; however, Rule Utilitarianism formulates its rules with the greatest good for the greatest number in mind. Kant formulated his rules by which ones he thought could be

comparing hobbes, locke and marx - humanlity - polictal

773 words - 4 pages number of people in telling the lie, and therefore to lie in this case is the right thing to do. 5.1k Views · 4 Upvotes Answered Aug 14 2015 Fundamentally speaking, they're complete opposites. Utilitarianism judges the moral value of an action based on its outcome (or expected outcome, for a hypothetical case). Kant's ethical theory bases all moral judgment on the nature of the action; the consequences are entirely irrelevant. Actually, it's a bit

Mill and Kant's Efforts to Solve an Ethical Dilemma

1373 words - 6 pages : Broadview Press, 2004. Print. Baxley, Anne. Kant's Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Print. Denis, Lara. ‘Autonomy and the Highest Good.’ Kantian Review 10.1 (2005): 33-59. Formosa, Paul. ‘Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist?’ European Journal of Philosophy, 21.2 (2013): 170-196. Gao, Guoxi. ‘Kant's Virtue Theory.’ Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 5.2 (2010): 266-279. Print

Setting Up A Moral System

578 words - 2 pages Non-consequentialism.Consequentialism is best described by utilitarianism, where decisions are based on theconsequences of the outcome of the decision made. On the other hand, non-consequentialismis best described as an ethical theory that is based not on the consequences of theaction, but on some higher moral standard that is placed upon them. Examples ofnon-consequentialism are Kant's Duty Ethics and Divine Command Theory. The conflictbetween

Comparsion Of John Stewary Mill And Emanuel Kants Philosophies On Morality

2288 words - 10 pages Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral traditions are formed. Immanuel Kant has presented one viewpoint in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his ability to reason. John Stuart Mill holds another opinion as presented in the book, Utilitarianism that is seemingly contradictory with the thoughts of

Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism

1395 words - 6 pages Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism Ethics can be defined as "the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or refining those beliefs in some way." (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are two theories that attempt to answer the ethical nature of human beings. This paper will attempt to explain how and why Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism differ as well as discuss why I believe

Utilitarianism V. Kantianism

1360 words - 5 pages Ethics can be defined as "the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or refining those beliefs in some way." (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are two theories that attempt to answer the ethical nature of human beings. This paper will attempt to explain how and why Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism differ as well as discuss why I believe Kant's theory provides a more

Bioethics Paper

988 words - 4 pages selfish lies would no longer help one to be selfish. Kant's analysis tries to show what is logically wrong with making yourself an exception to moral rules. The differences between duty theory and utilitarianism go beyond theory because the two accounts disagree on the rightness of certain specific actions. Take this situation: You know that your dying friend’s has been cheating on his wife, and you promised to keep it a secret. Are you obliged to do

The Legality of Marijuana

1707 words - 7 pages as the “Golden Rule.” Whereas the problem with Utilitarianism is that it is a very precise approach to understanding moral judgments. They require accurate measurements of “utility.” Utilitarianism has to make very strong claims on what is right and wrong on a very vague concept such as happiness. Utilitarianism may find more use when determining how a military may provide relief aid to an allied country or determine how much funding an

Political Philosophy: Kant's Hypothesis

1115 words - 4 pages , while defective obligations are those that one must perform just when the circumstances emerges. Utilitarianism is an alternate hypothesis in which its principle goal is to clarify the way of morals and ethical quality. Utilitarianism is a moral hypothesis which is based upon utility, or doing that which generates the best joy. As indicated by an utilitarian the ethical quality of act is discovered simply if the result prepares the best

Similar Essays

Kant's Moral Constructivism And His Conception Of Legislation

4270 words - 17 pages him to speak of what he calls "Kant's moral constructivism". In "Themes" Rawls begins with an outline of the "CI-Procedure" (where CI is an abbreviation for "categorical imperative"), which he sees as something given or laid out, based on the conception of free and equal persons as "reasonable" and "rational". The procedure specifies the first principles of right and justice, and through the procedure the content of the doctrine is constructed

Kant's Critique Of Utilitarianism And A Maxim Put Through The Categorical Imperative

544 words - 3 pages Kant's critique of Utilitarianism is that it treats people as a means not as an ends in themselves. Since he is a deontologist he presumes that there is a universal moral imperative, certain ways in which we must act, no matter what our individual desires or needs or utility might be. The Categorical Imperative is an idea of reason. This knowledge is not derived from experience but rather, it is a priori. It also binds us and we all act in a

An Examination Of Deontology And Utilitarianism In Deeply Moral Situations

1305 words - 5 pages utilitarianism overlook the notion that in circumstances of great moral difficulty, emotions often override our better judgement and weaken our capacity to reason effectively. In Kant's deontological stance, emotional distress subverts the woman's ability to establish a maxim on which to base her decision. Without this categorical imperative, Kant's theory is ineffective; that is, actions will only be advantageous as means to other things (and cease to be

What Is The Connection Between Kant's View On Suicide And His Understanding Of The Moral Law?

871 words - 3 pages self-preservation.For all the reasons given in Kant's formulation of the categorical imperative, suicide could not be a categorical imperative, but a hypothetical imperative. This means you would not be acting out of duty but only as a way of achieving something else which, according to Kant, goes against our reasoning and against our duties so would not be a moral action. Judged against the categorical imperative and Kant's notion of duty, his ideas on suicide fit in well with his moral law.