This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Utilitarianism, Principles Of Mill's Utilitarianism With Application To "Crime And Punishment" Well Organized And Good Grip On Mill's Theory

1672 words - 7 pages

"One death, and a thousand lives in exchange--it's simple arithmetic."-RaskolnikovRaskolnikov's mathematical evaluation of the moral dilemma presented to him in Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment exemplifies the empirical view of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism attempts to distinguish between right and wrong by measuring a decision based on its calculated worth. Raskolnikov appears to employ the fundamentals of utilitarianism by pitting the negative consequences of murdering his old landlady against the positive benefits that her money would bestow onto society. However, a true follower of utilitarianism would be outraged at Raskolnikov's claim that murdering the old woman can be considered morally right. Raskolnikov arbitrarily leaves out some necessary considerations in his moral "equation" that do not adhere to utilitarianism. A utilitarian would argue that Raskolnikov has not reached an acceptable solution because he has not accurately solved the problem. On the other hand, a non-utilitarian would reject even the notion of deliberating about the act of murder in such a mathematical manner. He might contend that Raskolnikov's reasoning, and the entire theory of utilitarianism, cannot be used to judge morality because it rejects individual rights and contains no moral absolutes.A utilitarian bases his belief upon two principles: the theory of right actions and the theory of value. These two principles work together and serve as criteria for whether or not a utilitarian can deem an action morally right. First, the theory of right action argues that the morally right decision is the one whose consequences are at least as good as any other available option . For example, upon receiving the assignment for this paper, I could have chosen to ignore the assignment and spend my time on something more enjoyable, or I could have worked diligently on my paper, actually turning it in. Employing the utilitarian principle, I would have to weigh each option and then decide which one has consequences at least as good as or better than any of the other options possible. But, what standard do I use to gauge the consequences in order to choose the best alternative?The theory of right action does not stand alone as the only condition for ethical evaluations. To measure the given alternatives, I would have to apply the theory of value. The theory of value bases itself on the premise that pleasure is the only thing valuable in itself and as an end. Mill clearly states, "that all desirable things are desirable either for pleasure inherent in themselves or as means to the promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain ." In my moral dilemma, I had to take each alternative and calculate the total amount of pleasure that each would produce, minus the total amount of pain each alternative would induce. So while not doing the paper might give me the most amount of immediate pleasure, the pain that I would incur upon receiving an F in my class would greatly reduce the...

Find Another Essay On Utilitarianism, Principles of Mill's utilitarianism with application to "Crime and Punishment" well-organized and good grip on Mill's theory

A Brief Analysis of John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism

1019 words - 4 pages This work has probably received more analysis than any other work on utilitarianism available. However, I seek to do here what many others have been unable to accomplish so far. I hope to, in five paragraphs, cover each of the chapters of Utilitarianism in enough depth to allow any reader to decide whether or not they subscribe to Mill's doctrine, and if so, which part or parts they subscribe to. I do this with the realization that much of

John Stuart Mill's Selections From Utilitarianism

577 words - 2 pages happiness” (77 Mill). Utilitarianism focuses on the general good of the world over individual pleasure. Although the theory sounds nice, for we all would love world peace, there are a few issues that I have with Mill’s responses that has me questioning the legitimacy of the theory. Mill explained in his essay that according to Utilitarianism, the moral value of an action relies solely on the outcome of the event, making the theory

Utilitarianism and Retributivism Views of Capital Punishment

668 words - 3 pages and justice. That is, before punishment is administered, the court should proof beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty. In this respect, Retributivism is superior to Utilitarianism theory (Fieser, 2001). The County District Court handles all the cases with utmost care to ensure fairness; no innocent person is punished. To achieve this, the court has well laid down procedures that must be followed prior to trial. First, selection of

Mill's Principles in His Work On Liberty

2739 words - 11 pages Mill's Principles in His Work On Liberty John Stuart Mill was born in London in 1806, the son of the philosopher James Mill. James Mill was a close friend of Jeremy Bentham, the founder of utilitarianism (the theory that states that the right course of action is the course which generates the most happiness). Bentham and James Mill educated J. S. Mill rigorously, to such an extent that he began reading Ancient Greek at

Unfinished theory of Utilitarianism

1409 words - 6 pages is an issue with utilitarianism because some people are unable to be altruistic out of their very nature for self-preservation. It imposes unfair burdens on others to require such strong impartiality. Quality vs. Quantity Argument My next argument against utilitarianism regards the practical application of this theory. When weighing between choices to achieve the most happiness overall, there must be some sort of satisfaction criteria that

The application of Bourdieu’s Theory to Neoliberal Principles and Practices

1294 words - 6 pages the dominated class. The ruling class can present ideologies into a field that truly only benefits them, yet it is presented as a common interest to the whole group (Bourdieu. 1979: 79). This power can be exercised economically, politically and socially as long as it is legitimized. Application of Bourdieu’s theory to neoliberalism Bourdieu (1979: 80) once said, “The dominant fractions, whose power is based on economic and political capital, seek

Outline and evaluate what you consider to be the most powerful objection to Utilitarianism as a moral theory

1074 words - 4 pages morality. It does not rely on God to provide us with moral rules, but places morality in human nature, in which human beings are primarily motivated by desire and passion, in a consistent effort to avoid pain and misery. People desire happiness, therefore happiness is good, and therefore general happiness is a social good. So, by calling an act good and right would actually mean it promoted the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people (or

examine the reasons why utilitarianism is a strong ethical theory

664 words - 3 pages FOR TRAVEL ONLY ON THE DATE AND AT THE TIME BOOKED (IF SPECIFIED ABOVE). 2 FOR FULL TERMS AND CONDITIONS PLEASE VISIT: WWW.GOLDENTOURS.COM/TERMS 3 PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE YOUR CREDIT CARD WITH YOU AS THIS WILL BE REGISTERED AT THE TIME OF CHECK IN FOR VERIFICATION OF IDENTITY. 4 BOOKED AND PAYABLE BY GOLDEN TOURS LTD. (ATTENTION SUPPLIER: PLEASE SEND THIS VOUCHER TO GOLDEN TOURS FOR PAYMENT - UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.) 10337818 Ticket

Critically Discuss Utilitarianism as an Ethical Theory. What are the Problems that Confront Utiliatarianism as a Theory of Public Policy?

2637 words - 11 pages Utilitarianism is a version of moral philosophy, initiated by Jeremy Bentham and refined and popularized by John Stuart Mill, which, true to its etymology, is concerned above all with the usefulness of human activity. Utilitarianism has been one of the most influential of ethical theories, and the one most widely used in ordinary 'common-sense' decisions. Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) argued that an action should be judged, not simply on the

Kant and Mill's Theories

2142 words - 9 pages will explain why I believe that Kant's theory provides a more plausible account of morality.Kantianism and Utilitarianism are two theories that attempt to answer the moral nature of human beings. Immanuel Kant's moral system is based on a belief that reason is the final authority for morality. John Stuart Mill's moral system is based on the theory known as utilitarianism, which is based upon utility, or doing what produces the greatest

On Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics

1914 words - 8 pages disadvantaged people from suffering. According to Classical Utilitarianism, Person A is morally obligated, not simply encouraged, to take the latter choice and to work as many hours as possible so that she can help alleviate the pain of those suffering and contribute to a higher overall utility. Similarly, if Person B’s resignation from his job will result in someone else’s happiness, person B is morally required to resign no matter how well he currently

Similar Essays

Mill's Utilitarianism Essay

1145 words - 5 pages tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure" (Mill, 1863, Ch. 2, p330). In other words, it results with the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people that are involved. Mill takes on the claim that utilitarianism is fit for a swine. “…life has no higher end than pleasure

Mill's Utilitarianism Essay

1336 words - 6 pages as a good deed? Supposed that this insane attitude can be construed as a virtue, the theory of utilitarianism, the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people, would never be executed but the greatest happiness for the least number of people will be carried into effect. “Passengers! As in the beginning, I belong to the front, and you belong to the tail. Know your place! Keep your place!” (Snowpiercer) This is a well-known line by

Jeremy Bentham And John Mill's Classical Utilitarianism

1398 words - 6 pages is always going to participate in the judgement, and thus different weights will be given to possible actions. In an attempt to salvage the theory, JS Mill expresses the argument that the person who makes a judgement on what is right and good will be impartial and emphatic to all, their intent as simple and pure as maximising collective happiness: “I must again repeat what the assailants of utilitarianism seldom have justice to acknowledge, that

Mill's Utilitarianism, Sacrifice The Innocent For The Common Good?

1209 words - 5 pages . Unfortunately for the decision maker, the information necessaryto make either of these calculations is unavailable.There is no way to determine which people will be killed and weighwhether their deaths would be good for society. Utilitarianism requiresthat one compare the good that the people would do for society with theharm they would do society if they were not killed. For example, if ayoung Adolf Hitler were in the building, it might do more