The thought of a utopia, where everyone is exactly the same, must appeal to some in need, such as the homeless and the poor. Those people would think that their lives would be better with the transition of our society. However, this is the wrong move to make and we should stay with our current, even if flawed form of government.
The first point I have to make is the high cost that we must pay to move to such a point. America, for example has the Constitution to ensure freedoms are preserved. The US Constitution has basic rights and freedoms that are ensured regardless of what may come. However, utopian societies such as Victory Cities lack framework that we take for granted. If you are accused of a crime, before it is decided whether you are guilty or innocent, you are entitled to rights, such as the right to a lawyer. Whereas, in a different form of government, like a utopia, it would be hard to ascertain that we would get the treatment we have today. Would we get the right to a jury in a utopia? It is impossible to know. Would the “police” have ultimate power in arresting innocents and forgo what rights we have? Learning the truth would be impossible as well as any publication differing from their point of view would be censored. We would not be able to express ourselves, our thoughts, or the truth for fear of losing our lives. Then, we would not live in a utopia. We would live in a dictatorship.
Even if we were willing and able to make such a momentous change, there are always people with their own opinions in a utopia. How would the governing system of a utopia prevent outbursts which may lead to actual thinking? As in The Giver, they will either let them protest in public, or will attempt to quash such rebellious thoughts? How would they do it? Would they use drugs, or would they simply kill those who shake the foundations of their “perfect society”? In addition, how would they prevent crime? Will they let criminals go, or will they kill them as well? And even if those questions were solved, there are always those with a different point of view. Will they invent devices to prevent free thinking? Such thinking could lead to citizens asking questions that a utopian government desperately does not want to answer. The Government cannot force them to join these utopias unwillingly or they will start a civil war. There will always be something that is different from the average person and me, just as there will always be something different from the average person and the next person, whether it is our likes, dislikes, or feelings on various subjects. No matter how you attempt to create such a utopia, it is not possible to prevent all thoughts of change; to quash all differences between humans as a whole.
Finally, I ask you to consider outside influences to such a utopia, if one were created. All of the people of the United States have been exposed to the concept of democracy. Citizens of other countries have been exposed to similar...