This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Value Pluralism And Absolute Moral Judgments

1735 words - 7 pages

Widespread and deep moral disagreements are persistently resistant to rational solutions and thus allow for continuing debate over the validity of moral judgments. This paper will discuss prominent positions regarding whether moral judgments may be true and false in an absolute sense or a relative sense, in light of the diverse and intense disagreement in moral judgment. This paper will defend the pluralistic conclusion that if there are not specific universal values, there is at least a minimum value of humanity without which a society could not survive. Moral judgments may be true and false in the absolute sense of this minimum.
There are two main categories to classify different positions regarding moral judgments. Normative Moral Relativity is the view that the truth or falsity of moral judgments is not absolute, but is relative to the convictions, practices, or traditions of some group of persons such as a society or culture. This answers the question “How should I live?” by saying that one should follow the values of your society or culture. Richard Shweder, in his “The Astonishment of Anthropology”, defends an anthropological relativism that stresses the importance of tolerance and moral diversity. Shweder’s position allows for difference in moral opinion among different cultures. Terence Tanner’s anthropological view, in his “Human Rights, Human Difference”, is like Shweder’s in it appreciation for diversity, however Tanner calls for “transcultural” principles of justice or, allowing people to be different so long as they allow other to be different as well.
Moral Objectivity is the view that morality would be objective only if moral judgments are ordinarily true or false in an absolute sense, many moral judgments are true, and persons are often justified in believing true ones and disbelieving false ones. Thomas Aquinas defended a version of Moral objectivism in his “Natural Law and Moral Disagreements”, claiming that natural law is universal and that disagreements regarding the universal natural law can be explained by mistakes, developing understanding of that universal natural law or the need for divine intervention. In her “Non-Relative Virtues: an Aristotelian Approach”, Martha Nussbaum examines different daily and universal human experiences in which most people must participate. Through this examination Nussbaum defends a version of Moral Objectivism, this one heavily supported by Aristotle, that there is indeed a single objective account of the human good based on our common humanity. However, it is Isaiah Berlin’s version of pluralism in his “Pursuit of the Ideal” that fully encompasses the nature of moral judgments, calling for a base level of absolute moral judgment and then allowing for relativism in other areas of moral judgment.
Throughout this essay, we will assume that there is a world of objective values, that is to say, there is a world of those ends to which individuals strive simply for the sake of those ends,...

Find Another Essay On Value Pluralism and Absolute Moral Judgments

Objections to Rossian Pluralism Make It a More Valuable Moral Theory

1413 words - 6 pages trade-offs. However, I will demonstrate that the problem of trade-offs is an issue that can be neglected as a valid objection to Rossian Pluralism because it is applicable to other theories as well and it is a factor that makes a moral theory more valuable than not. The prima facie duties that William David Ross has listed include duties of fidelity, reparation, gratitude, justice, beneficence, self-improvement, and non-maleficence. Duties of

Consider the extent to which the making of social policy is a pluralistic process

1201 words - 5 pages Labour, Conservative, Lib Dem, Green), the existence of many ethical values (moral pluralism), or a variety of cultural norms (cultural pluralism or multiculturalism). It indicates that diversity is healthy and desirable, usually because it protects individual freedom and promotes debate, argument and understanding. The more narrow definition of pluralism is that it is a theory of the distribution of political power. It states that power is

Having a Definite Answer to a Question

1844 words - 7 pages Having a Definite Answer to a Question Some questions do not have definite answers and are usually judgments of value. This means that they cannot be proved true or false, they include; religious judgments, aesthetic judgments and moral judgments. They aspire to be as definite as judgments of fact. However it is debatable as to whether them not having a definite answer makes them more or less important. We find that as

What exactly is cultural relativism in metaethics? Is cultural relativism true? Can cultural relativists uphold the principle of cultural tolerance?

2125 words - 9 pages Metaethics is a branch of ethics that explores normative ethical questions concerning what it means be 'good'; the existence of objective and absolute values; the source of our values; and the nature of our moral judgments. Cultural relativism is a theory within the domains of metaethics which attempts to answer these questions, but in doing so raises its own problematic questions, such as whether or not we can be culturally tolerant and not

Essay Question: 'Pluralists and ruling elite theory provide fundamentally different accounts of the distribution of political power.' Discuss

1267 words - 5 pages generally are there to allow pluralism to flourish, and to ensure everyone has minimum powerFaith Maria has extender her research in political pluralist theory and has concluded that the pluralism distribituonal of power exists In societies which are developed and have sufficient Human Rights regulalation, this is cited by arguments in her article which was published in 1980 'The absolute power'I fully agree with Faith Maria's claims that pluralism is

Kant and Moral Values

4752 words - 19 pages sense of the idea of value as such; 4. Moral Goodness cannot be abused like intellectual, aesthetic, temperamental and other values; 5. Moral values are good in that they never must be sacrificed for any other value, because they are incomparably higher and should absolutely and ‘first’ be sought for; 6. Moral goodness makes the person as such good; 7. All three different modes of participation in moral values are linked to the absolute, most


1310 words - 6 pages intuition that “there are no moral facts at all”. In the second section, he provides the readers with a comparative statement, in which he points out the resemblance between moral and religious judgments. Both, he states, confide in “realities” that are imaginary. To Nietzsche, moralities are not absolute. He regards a morality as an “interpretation” or rather a “misinterpretation” of phenomena, which are perceptions that the senses or the mind

My Objections to Pluralism And Exclusivism

2683 words - 11 pages to be true but only partially because of God’s infinite nature. For someone to be say they have seen or are speaking for God is to imply you can see infinitely and know everything which God knows. Although religious pluralism sounds like an easy solution, it has several flaws. His view that shared moral behavior equals mutual salvation is subjective. Hick associates the idea of moral behavior with salvation when there seems to be no worthy

criticism of morality

997 words - 4 pages have the same desired outcome is wrong. Some might prefer 'smoking' even if it hurts their health for their pleasure and some might prefer 'exercise' just to live up to the image of society. So the idea of absolute or universal outcome is wrong. Moral science cannot have any basis to decide what is right or wrong. Suppose it is assumed that the outcome is to "avoid worst fate for everyone." Worst fate for a person is decided by that person not

Compare and Contrast 7 of the Main Ethical Principles

4261 words - 17 pages acceptance, it means with absolutely no exceptions, and a moral absolute is something that exists in the real world, independent of changes in perception. Protagoras concluded, through the use of human opinion for his data, likely to be not the most reliable source, that if morals are not absolute in nature, they are relative to the cultures that they are inherent to. This conclusion leads him to be called the father of cultural relativism. Using the

Journal Review - Incoherence of the moral "ought", an analysis of a paper by Elizabeth Anscombe entitled, 'Modern Moral Philosophy.'

642 words - 3 pages asserts in from his book, Wittgenstein and Moral Philosophy, that moral judgments are absolute: ' is the absolute use of these terms (i.e. 'good,' 'right,' 'ought,' etc.) that seems distinctively ethical.' His reasons for this assertion include that ethics and specific ethical judgments '...require, and perhaps can have, no justification.' He also explains that there is no ethical reason, to be morally good when looked upon by society, or to

Similar Essays

Writers Often Use Humour To Make Moral Judgments. Compare/ Contrast In Emma And Pride And Prejudice

1822 words - 7 pages , she is devise through which Austen can make moral judgments on those who are the extremes of snobbish pride. Although her character is of 'new money', it is evident that this quality cannot buy 'well - bred' characteristics; a social comment of Austen's perhaps. This is the case with Lady Catherine De Bourgh also whom Jane Austen's social satire focuses very strongly on.Mr. Collins, worshipper of Lady Catherine, has great value as a comical and

"Of Mice And Men" By John Steinbeck. Composed Of Four Major Themes, The Value Of Dreams And Goals, Moral Responsibility, Social Injustice, And The Bond Of Friendship And Loyalty

715 words - 3 pages 'Of Mice and Men', by John Steinbeck, is composed of four major themes.These themes are the value of dreams and goals, moral responsibility, social injustice,and the bond of friendship and loyalty.The value of dreams and goals are that they provide hope and the desire to keepgoing in life, rather than laying down to die. When Lennie is feeling depressed in thewoods he asks George to tell him about the 'dream farm' again. This is the farm

The Advantages Of Non Absolutist Ethical Plualism

1902 words - 8 pages moral rule. Shafer Landau states that premise 3 is true, and I agree with him. He claims that the premise to contest is premise 1, because to prove ethical pluralism true, you must show that the multiple absolute moral rules will never conflict. This can be done. Shafer Landau says that the way around this argument is inaction. He states that, “so long as all absolute rules can be obeyed by doing nothing, then absolute rules will never conflict

Ethical Perspectives Essay

1229 words - 5 pages boundaries (cultural relativism), or in the context of individual preferences (moral subjectivism). An extreme relativist position might suggest that judging the moral or ethical judgments or acts of another person or group has no meaning. Though, most relativists advocate a more limited version of the theory. In moral relativism, there are no absolute rights and wrongs, only different situations (Wikipedia 2008).Some moral relativists hold that