This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Vivisection No More Essay

2425 words - 10 pages

I am not interested to know whether vivisection produces results that are profitable to the human race or doesn't.... The pain which it inflicts upon unconsenting animals is the basis of my enmity toward it, and it is to me sufficient justification of the enmity without looking further. ~Mark TwainVivisection is defined as the practice of operating on living animals in order to gain knowledge of pathological or physiological processes. In this paper I hope to convince my readers that this act is not only appalling and inexcusable, but also completely unnecessary. I will briefly discuss the history and uses of vivisection in this country and will discuss why such atrocities are still allowed to occur today. I will point out all of the misconception currently held about animal research and will educate my readers about the true horrors of this practice. Also, I will discuss the many, many scientific downfalls of current animal research and alternatives to vivisection.The website for the Humane Society of the United States reports that documentation of animal research dates all the way back to the ancient Greeks and Romans. This type of research began to increase throughout the scientific revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries and by the 18th and 19th centuries the use of animals in research gradually increased from uncommon to mainstream. Even back then vivisection was not without controversy. By the mid 1800's principles for regulating animal research were proposed and soon there was a flood of antivivisection activity throughout the US, Europe and Brittan. Citizen outrage died down shortly after this time and did not resurface until the early 1950's when organizations focusing on the care of laboratory animals began to surface. In 1966 the US congress passed the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act in response to public outrage, including an article in Life magazine that showed the conditions these animals were living in. (unknown author(unknown, year)Since that time the government has continued to change and reword their animal protection laws whenever public outrage becomes loud enough. In the mean time millions upon millions of animals have been tortured, mutilated and killed in the name of science.Many people question how we could do without animal research and fear that without it important medical breakthroughs would be sacrificed. Many researchers want us to feel this way, but the reality is that animal research is unnecessary and misleading, and it has caused much more death that it has saved lives. If this is true then you are probably wondering why this form of research is still being used. The animal Liberation Front responds to this question on their website by saying:Vivisection is a multi-billion dollar industry, with many interconnected parties. Vivisectors receive hundreds of thousands of dollars, even millions, for experimenting on animals. Research grants are frequently awarded based on political and economic motives rather than...

Find Another Essay On Vivisection No More

Vivisection Essay

1916 words - 8 pages Alexander II by the Peoples Will terrorist organization Alexander II was the czar who freed the serfs and was implanting many reforms on Russian society after this assassination when Alexander III took power he cracked down on all the reforms going more and more towards vivisection morality This then angers more people and radicalizing them. Also during the Crimean War the Russian army was destroyed by European forces causing groups to question the

Is the Killing of Animals for Research Okay?

1340 words - 5 pages Vivisection      Many people today, including scientists and doctors, are questioning the suffering and killing of animals for the sake of human beings. Is it morally correct to dissect a frog or a worm for the purpose of educating a high school student? On the other hand, must "We study life to protect life" (1:131) The issue of killing animals for the use of biomedical research, education, and cosmetics

The Barbaric Nature of Animal Testing

1035 words - 5 pages $8,702,792,210. Animal testing is escalating at an unprecedent rate, imagine how much money is being used since the number of projects has increased (The Escalating Cost of Animal Experimentation). An abundance of money could be saved and used towards more efficient projects if scientists would use other alternatives as to testing on animals. There are many alternatives to vivisection, thus being: computer-generated animals, monitoring humans, vitro

Animal Experimation Position Paper (Against)

862 words - 3 pages not an opinion torturing and/or killing them is against the law. Vivisection isn't just cruel it's totally unnecessary. There are many alternatives to animal experimentation. A few examples are mechanical models and simulators, surveys of people and their culture, diet, lifestyle and other factors that affect human heath. There could also be human volunteers hired to participate in an experiment, audio visual aids, and many more creative

Animal Testing

640 words - 3 pages substitutes for us to test products on, the law doesn’t require that we do. What’s even more horrifying is that no animal experiment is illegal, and therefore these ‘tests’ can be completely irrelevant to human health, and no matter how painful or cruel the test may be to animals it is completely legal. Some companies that test their products on animals include Almay, Johnson & Johnson, Clearasil, Axe, Lancôme (owned by L’Oréal), and Pantene

Animal Testing Regarding Ethical Issues

1061 words - 4 pages no enrichment. Studies show that mice are sympathetic creatures, so they become even more stressed when they notice another animal being put through a dreadful procedure. In 2009, a secret analysis of animal testing labs exposed chimpanzees twirling around in their miniature cages repetitively, gnawing on fresh gashes, and even tugging out their own hair due to chronic psychological distress caused by living in the lab. When famous primatologist

Animal Testing: Cruelty versus Benefit

1007 words - 4 pages prolong youth”, “Animal experimenting keeps us healthy forever” and so many other similar slogans which people hear on TV or read in the newspapers. In a teenage slang it would be called “blah…blah…blah…” or just a simple lie in a normal language that we all shouldn’t believe in. Are you asking why? First of all many of us have heard the word vivisection, though it would be much better if no one knew what it is. Vivisection is a true

Editorial: Animal Testing

396 words - 2 pages "...[U]sing animals as models for humans in the laboratory and classroom is both morally unacceptable and scientifically flawed" (National Anti-Vivisection Society).An issue that I am passionate about is cosmetic animal testing. I believe this a very barbaric and inhumane way to test the harmful factors of a product. The way that technology is advancing everyday offers alternatives that are a more humane way to test. One possible example is to

Final Essay: Animal Ethics in Animal Narratives

1875 words - 8 pages can have little to no impact on another, much less substantially affect the unfathomably vast universe. However, Moreau neglects to consider the huge effect that such extreme anguish can have on the individual. While the vivisection in Well’s novel is more extreme than most real life examples, it still brings up important points about the morality of such procedures. Vivisection was invaluable in understanding the anatomy and biology of animal

The Cons of Animal Experimentation

943 words - 4 pages Reference Center. Web. 3 Mar. 2014. “Medical Doctors & Scientists AGAINST Vivisection - Being the Artificial Inducement of Injury, Illness & Disease on Live Animals & Humans; ‘animal Research’, ‘animal Tests’, ‘animal Experiments.’” DOCTORS AGAINST VIVISECTION Animal Research Tests Experiments. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Feb. 2014. Ruesch, Hans. 1000 Doctors (and many more) Against Vivisection. N.p.: Hans Ruesch Foundation, 1989. Vivisection Research. Web. 4

Animal Experimentation is Necessary

1607 words - 6 pages , unfortunate, but if they're going to be euthanized regardless, why not have their death serve some helpful purpose, such as helping medical students to become better doctors? The fact is that there are more dogs than there are people to care for them.  Utilizing these animals for the dog labs is the most practical solution to a very unfortunate situation, and is no more "cruel" than letting the dogs continue to live in overcrowded kennels and pounds

Similar Essays

Animal Experimentation: Granted For The Good

589 words - 2 pages Animal Experimentation: Granted for the Good The fight for animal rights has been going on for many decades and has increased even more in the past years. Animal rights advocate that animals should be viewed as human beings, not property. These advocates approach the issue from different situations but they all agree that animal should not be used as food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation. Vivisection is one right that has gained

Viviection Essay

4715 words - 19 pages movement was established ('vivisection').There are different views as to why or why not there should be animal experimentation. For example, Descartes believed that animals are incapable of feeling pain. He said 'The greatest of all the prejudices we have retained from our infancy is that of believing that beasts think' (1:4). In other words, Descartes believes that animals have no sensations. Singer argues and thinks that animals have feelings

Animal Rights Do We Really Love Our Animals?

2433 words - 10 pages from a monkey's eyes being sewn shut for long periods of times, to a dog's eyes getting burned by radiation, and even so far as to subject fully conscience cats and dogs to surgery with no anesthetic. When they are done, if they survive they are then reused for more tests. Often times, animals such as dogs and cats are silenced through a grotesque procedure. This process which consists of cutting the animals vocal chords to silence the specimen

Putting A Stope To Animal Testing

1027 words - 5 pages society, animals have little, if any rights because humans are the dominant species. It would be more moral to keep human suffering down to a minimum as opposed to animals suffering. But that’s not fair, because animals also have rights. But the Animal welfare Act (AWA) excludes mice and rats from these rights, and they make up approximately ninety-five percent of all animals used for experiments. Just because an animal can’t say no, doesn’t mean we