This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Closure In The Play Waiting For Godot

1058 words - 5 pages

Closure is a very important aspect of a narrative. Closure or the lack of it accomplishes the goal of a creating a text which readers would want to continue reading to find out the ending, it helps to lead the reader on. The term “closure” according to Abott is “best understood as something we look for in narrative, as desire that authors understand and often expend art to satisfy or frustrate” (Abott, 57).In the play Waiting for Godot, the lack of closure is very evident through out it. This play significantly follows the hermeneutic code, the level of questions/answers. This code has allowed for the author to grasp the attention of the readers, as people like to find and understand closures, but also allowing the author to not give a closure. Moreover, the type of play, which is an absurdist, is an important part of the reason behind this play lacking a closure. The definition of absurdist is: “A writer, performer, etc., whose work presents an audience or readership with absurdities, typically in portraying the futility of human struggle in a senseless and inexplicable world; esp. a writer or proponent of absurdist drama” (OED). The absurd genre allows for the play to not directly answer the questions, but to leave it open so that the reader can interpret the actions to their liking, just as they would interpret situations in real life, where no events are written in stone. Using the hermeneutic code, and the absurdist genre, along with a lack of closure, the author has written Waiting For Godot a play written to make the audience think.
In the book The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative, H. Porter Abott explains the connection between closure and the hermeneutic code. Abott explains that Hermeneutic is “having to do with questions and answers” (57), he also describes it as a level of questions. At this level, narrative is formed in such a way in which questions are likely to arise in the minds of the readers, and the readers want those questions to be answered, readers want “enlightenment”. If the author gives “enlightenment” to the reader, than closure has been achieved (Abott, 61).
The hermeneutic code is followed in Waiting for Godot, many of the passages are written in a manner which creates the reader to come up with questions. But the none of the questions are not answered, creating a frustrating lack of closure. The questions are raised as soon as the play begins and continue till the end. For example, Act 1 itself starts off with raising a lot of questions through the conversation between Vladimir and Estragon:
ESTRAGON: Beat me? Certainly they beat me.
VLADIMIR: The same lot as usual?
ESTRAGON: The same? I don't know. (Beckett, Act 1)
Just by reading these three lines, one wonders: who beat them up, why are they being beat. The answer to this is never given in the play, instead it is always shut down in some sort of manner, the topic is changed. In this scene the topic is changed from the beatings to Estragon's...

Find Another Essay On Closure in the Play Waiting for Godot

Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot as an Existentialist Play

4485 words - 18 pages irrelevant, as little information is ever given throughout the play about this indefinable Mr. X. What is an important element of the play is the act of waiting for someone or something that never arrives. Western readers may find it natural to speculate on the identity of Godot because of their inordinate need to find answers to questions. Beckett however suggests that the identity of Godot is in itself a rhetorical question. It is possible to stress

"Waiting for Godot": Is it useful to consider this play a comedy?

728 words - 3 pages "Waiting for Godot" is a particularly funny play revolving around two seemingly homeless men who are waiting for someone named Godot who, in no uncertain terms, will never arrive. There are multiple scenes revolving around the characters, particularly Estragon and Vladimir, acting out as clowns and being nonsensical, that appear to be fabricated with the sole purpose of invoking laughter. Undoubtedly, Waiting for Godot can be considered a comedy

'Silence is pouring into this play like water into a sinking ship' (Samuel Beckett on Waiting for Godot). Discuss 'silence' and sub-texts in modern drama

1626 words - 7 pages and is also evident in Chekhov's Three Sisters. The family dream of moving to Moscow but are waiting for something that will never happen. They are left to pass the time, like in Beckett's plays, Waiting for Godot and Endgame. There are invisible barriers trapping them with, "speech without consequence [and] reflecting action without conclusion." Beneath the meaningless chattering of Chekhov's characters here, lies the dreadful realization of their

Christianity in Waiting for Godot

1193 words - 5 pages Irish-born French author Samuel Beckett was well known for his use of literary devices such as black comedy in his various literary works. Written during late 1948 and early 1949 and premiered as a play in 1953 as En attendant Godot, Beckett coupled these devices with minimalism and absurdity in order to create the tragicomedy known to English speakers as Waiting for Godot. True to its title, Waiting for Godot is the tale of a pair of best

Absurdism in Waiting for Godot

1024 words - 4 pages audiences. Such dramas make it hard for the audiences to make sense about what exactly is the meaning of the play or the story. But still entertains the audiences. It might seem to be an absurd to the audiences but it is rather the reality which presents the world where the daily actions are without meaning. That’s what most of the drams in the theatre of absurdism portray. And is basically the core of waiting for Godot. Becket presents before

The Meaningless of Life Explored in Waiting for Godot

1277 words - 5 pages Estragon’s decision not to move, which is because they do not know what to do, signifies the inability to find out the meaning off life. Instead of ending the play with some type of closure for Vladimir and Estragon or the readers, Beckett ended the play with two men doing nothing just as they had been doing the entire play. The last two lines helped create a successful ending to Waiting for Godot in that it reiterated the message that humans stand

The Futility of Human Existence in Waiting for Godot

651 words - 3 pages We live on a planet revolving around the sun, while there are at least about one septillion other stars in this universe. What is the significance of our existence in this infinite cosmos? What is the purpose of our lives? With the explosion of scientific knowledge and the WWII bombs in the modernity epoch, the insignificance of our lives was realized; Samuel Becket staged the futility of human existence in the play Waiting for Godot. He

The Theme of Truth in Waiting For Godot

1516 words - 6 pages The absurd play “Waiting for Godot” which was written by Samuel Beckett after the Second World War in French. This play was the first play which was so absurd so preposterous for the public that the name “Theatre of Absurd” was coined to classify such plays and drama. The play was first performed in a small theatre in Paris 1953 it was quite farce because of the low comedy and the absurd situations it gave the public. This public greatly

Distortion in Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot

690 words - 3 pages Distortion in Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot Distortion presents exaggerated and absurd portraits of the human condition.  Distortion also equips an author with a plane of existence that provides an avenue for posing questions concerning the nature of thought, behavior, and existence.  Samuel Beckett distorts reality in his play Waiting For Godot; this literary effect enables him to question human life and a possible afterlife

Alienation in Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot

779 words - 3 pages Alienation in Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot   The alienation of humanity from truth, purpose, God, and each other is the theme of Samuel Beckett's play, "Waiting for Godot." The play's cyclical and sparse presentation conveys a feeling of the hopelessness that is an effect of a godless, and therefore, purposeless world. Lack of communication, the cause of man's alienation, is displayed well through absurdist diction, imagery

Waiting For Godot

574 words - 2 pages a play in which two characters are waiting for someone who never comes. If you wanted to impress someone, you would say Waiting for Godot is an absurdist play that explores themes of existentialist philosophy. The sheer emptiness and randomness of the plot causes the audience (or reader) to wonder if anything is going to happen, and whether there is any meaning in anything in the play - or in life. Beckett himself translated the play into

Similar Essays

Lack Of Closure In Samuel Beckett's Waiting For Godot

2441 words - 10 pages Closure is a very important aspect of a narrative. Closure or the lack of it accomplishes the goal of a creating a text which readers would want to continue reading to find out the ending, it helps to lead the reader on. The term “closure” according to Abbott is “best understood as something we look for in narrative, as desire that authors understand and often expend art to satisfy or frustrate” (Abbott, 57).In the play Waiting for Godot, the

Compare And Contrast The Structure Of "Waiting For Godot" With The Structure Of Any Traditional Play

962 words - 4 pages Vladimir, arrive to stand around waiting for Godot. They keep waiting, although Godot never comes. Act two repeats the same action as Act one. The play ends in the middle and the characters are still waiting. (SparkNotes, 2002).In "Oedipus the King", there are well defined characters with clear motivations. Seeing Oedipus in action, allows us to see that he is kingly, a man of power and accomplishment. He's kind-hearted but rash in his temper

Samuel Becket's "Waiting For Godot": A Play Sans Meaning

1512 words - 6 pages In "Waiting for Godot", Samuel Beckett produces a truly cryptic work. On first analyzing the play, one is not sure of what, if anything, happens or of the title character's significance. In attempting to unravel the themes of the play, interpreters have extracted a wide variety symbolism from the Godot's name. Some, taking an obvious hint, have proposed that Godot represents God and that the play is centered on religious symbolism. Others have

Consider 'waiting For Godot' As An Absurd Play

1662 words - 7 pages that according to one of the Gospels, one of the two thieves who flanked Jesus on the cross was saved. In Godot's promised arrival they place their hope for salvation. The first intruder upon their solitary and anxious waiting is the monstrous Pozzo, whom they initially mistake for Godot, but who, with his grotesque servant, Lucky, is the epitome of all that is vicious and degrading. Throughout the play, the near desperate waiting continues, in