Attempting To Prove God Through Reason

1761 words - 7 pages

A sixteen year old girl with red hair and soft porcelain skin was sitting on a bench in the park reading an old, very used, book. The girl’s name was Meggy, and she was reading her bible. As she read she heard the clicking of bicycle spokes come near her from down the path. The bike stopped in front of her and she herd the familiar voice of Harry, a boy from her class, call out to her.

“What are you reading, Carrot?” He said to her in a teasingly.

“My bible” she replied as she looked up at him smiling.

“Do you really believe in all that God stuff?” He asked a confused look on his face.

She squinted her olive green eyes at him and answered, “Of course I do!”

“Why?” He asked, “How can you prove that what that book says is true?”

“Well, it says in John 17:17b ‘God’s word is truth’ and the Bible is God’s word so it must be true!” She answered confidently.

He rolled his eyes saying, “I meant using anything but the Bible!”

“Oh, well, ummm…” Meggy replied, at a loss for words.

Many Christians are like Meggy: full of faith in the Bible and God, but have no way of proving it. And when asked to they immediately go to the Bible as proof. But to others that is not a very convincing argument to believe in the Bible or in God. Saint Anselm’s friends had the same opinion, and asked him to write to prove God and Scripture through reason and without using scripture as proof. In the preface of his Monologium he sets out, upon his friend’s request, to prove God and the scripture without using the scripture to prove it. He says “It is in accordance with their wish, rather than with my ability that they have prescribed such a form for the writing of this meditation; in order that nothing in scripture should be argued on the authority of scripture itself.” Some people say that this is wrong, that scriptures must be used, and only the scriptures, to prove God. But how is that possible? One could not say that Hobbits are real because the book “The Hobbit” by J.R.R. Tolkin says that they are real. It is circular reasoning, which is illogical and flawed. So how would one go about proving God, without using the scriptures? Through reason. Which is precisely what St. Anselm set out to do. And he was not wrong to do so, rather it is important to search of a reason for the scripture and Christians should work to do so in the modern day.

Saint Anselm was not incorrect to attempt to prove God through reason. One of the ways he attempted to prove that God is real, through reason, is saying that God is that “than which nothing greater can be conceived”. At first glance this one sentence looks as though it is complex and confusing and someone must be very knowledgeable to understand it. But that is not the case. St. Anselm says that something that abides in our minds and also in reality is better than it merely being in our minds. He uses the analogy of the painter to explain this. He says “When a painter first conceives of what he will afterwards preform, he has it...

Find Another Essay On Attempting to Prove God Through Reason

"To Play or Not to Play... God?" This is a satirical essay that argues against using genetics to create human beings (through cloning, etc).

848 words - 3 pages To Play or Not to Play... God?By: Carly PitneyIt is now the twenty-first century and humanity has come a long way from Galileo's telescope and Newton's Law of Gravity. We have made enormous leaps and bounds in scientific fields, especially genetics. We have split the atom; discovered the gene that causes leprosy; cloned animals; created a real cowboy, a half human, half cow foetus; and are now on the verge of 'improving' the average human by

God Exhibits Parental Characteristics. Uses examples from the Old Testament of the Bible to prove that God exhibits the traits of a parent when interacting with humans.

566 words - 2 pages Many people look to God for comfort. They live their lives based on His teachings in the Bible. People also look to their parents for comfort and live their lives based on what they teach them. In numerous ways, God is comparable to a parent. Providing comfort, setting rules, and disciplining are three traits of parents that God exhibits.One way God is similar to a parent is He provides comfort to His children. An example is when people are

Explain the Development of the Ontological Argument

1313 words - 6 pages existence”. In conclusion, although Descartes and Anselm’s arguments were produced in two different periods; they follow the same line of thinking. Through a priori knowledge and reason, they have drawn the conclusion that God exists. The fundamental part of the Ontological Argument is that, we are able to prove God’s existence because we are able to believe it so. The Ontological Argument does not look at designs in the physical universe, but at our mind’s logic that had led to the belief that God exists in reality. “God is that then which nothing greater can be conceived” – God is greater than anything that exists in both reality and thought.

Title of Paper

765 words - 4 pages misguided perspective. Ultimately, God is an unfalsifiable entity. The argument for God cannot be made from science, because scientific evidence must be observable. This fact does not preclude the existence of God; it does, however, occlude an argument of God through scientific rationality. Attempting to prove God is like attempting to prove the integrity of scientific reasoning: it can’t be done, because like scientific reasoning, God is an

The Achievements of Saint Thomas Aquainas

641 words - 3 pages through logic and reasoning alone. For people to believe on God, there must be an essential element, FAITH. Without faith, no matter how foolproof an argument seems to be, there will always be the ones who do not believe. About Aquinas first proof, I could ask, “What moved God?”, and Aquinas would probably answer that nothing moved God because God has always existed. But for Thomas to prove his first argument he must prove also prove that God has existed forever. So he could not prove that God exists until he proved that He has always existed, though, he cannot prove that God has always existed until he proves that God exists at all.

An essay on man

980 words - 4 pages inadequacy of Pope's explanations demonstrates the necessity of submitting. Man should not struggle for answers, because any answer he can produce will prove insufficient. He can only trust that God is just, and that whatever evil He permits, He permits for a valid reason. Perhaps Pope realizes this himself for a moment at the end of the second epistle. For he does not conclude by attempting to explain the existence of evil. Rather, he says only

St. Thomas Aquinas' First Two Ways in Proving the Existence of God

2546 words - 10 pages would simply be "nothing" and the universe and concept of time would cease to exist. On that account, Aquinas' first two ways seem to present a successful argument for the existence of the creator God. As with all arguments attempting to prove the existence of God, Aquinas' first two ways are subjected to possible criticisms, objections and/or weak points.To begin with, consider Aquinas' first way, the Argument from Motion. Aquinas says that the

Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy

1968 words - 8 pages Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes’ third meditation from his book Meditations on First Philosophy, examines Descartes’ arguments for the existence of God. The purpose of this essay will be to explore Descartes’ reasoning and proofs of God’s existence. In the third meditation, Descartes states two arguments attempting to prove God’s existence, the Trademark argument and the traditional Cosmological argument

Descartes and Knowing with Certainty of God's Existence

1075 words - 4 pages Descartes thought that through reason he could prove gods existence, while Pascal saw it as not being a matter of reason. Both men saw reason as a legitimate and useful tool. However Descartes, through his process of doubting sought to prove undeniably that god existed. Through his destructive and constructive processes he came up with a logical method that would prove God's existence with 100 percent certainty. This is another point on which

David Hume: Against the Design and Cosmological Arguments for God's Existence

834 words - 3 pages In his dialogues concerning religion David Hume explores whether religious belief can be rational. Because Hume is an empiricist he thinks that a belief is rational only if it is sufficiently supported by experiential evidence. So the question is really, is there enough evidence in the world to allow us to infer an infinitely good, wise, powerful, perfect God? Hume does not ask whether we can rationally prove that God exists, but rather whether

descartes

1227 words - 5 pages of God is correct or incorrect. In other words, this idea was considered false until proven otherwise. Since, the idea of God is in doubt, the trustworthiness of one’s reasoning must also be in doubt. Another problem with his proof was that he used his powers of reason without first proving that they were beyond doubt. God's infinite perfection was made certain to Descartes through the very same capacities that he has not proven trustworthy

Similar Essays

Thomas Aquinas Work To Prove The Existence Of God

1037 words - 4 pages Being a devout Christian, Thomas Aquinas naturally believed in God, but he wanted to prove God's existence to those who could not accept things on faith alone. As a result he made five proofs, which he claims, prove the existence of God. With each proof there is always a beginning, a starting point, Aquinas claims it must be God that is the beginning of each. The first proof does not do complete justice to Aquinas’s claim that God exist, while

Argument Against William Rowe's Article On The Problem Of Evil To Prove That An Omni X God Does Exist

1560 words - 6 pages justification for suffering as well even if we think that there is none. It is arrogant for humans to even think that we could understand the reasons that God has for suffering. If a human being thinks that simply because they cannot find any legitimate reason that God would have for suffering that they can conclude that there is no all loving god, then that human is wrong. Being able to know and understand all that God does would put human beings

It Is Our Moral Responsibility To Question God's Existence And If There Is A God, Would He Want Us To Use Our Reason.

771 words - 3 pages with the ability to use reason, so in giving one the ability to reason, one should use it. If one's reasoning is questioning the existence of God, then why is it wrong to question God's existence? If one uses reason to prove the existence of God, it is praise, however, if one uses reason to question God's existence (s)he is an atheist. This hypocritical situation is gives more proof than ignorance that reasoning is what God has expected from us

Robinson Crusoe And The Many Trials He Went Through Compared To The Trials We Must Persevere Through. Robinson Shown With God Like Attitude

1456 words - 6 pages no matter what our circumstances is a must if we want to live a good life. We clearly see a picture of this through Crusoe. The survival techniques and will to survive he depicted show us that we must do what ever it takes for living necessity to our required status.If I could ask Robinson Crusoe 5 questions they would be as follows: Being alone on the island did you feel closer to God or further away, Did you have any longings for modern day