This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Was The Bomb Justified? Essay

1536 words - 7 pages

Regardless of the different estimations of high and low American casualties, the majority of the estimations echoed towards the high end. Even if some of the estimations were off, it was still an alarming risk for American soldiers, and the President understood that. The President also understood the Japanese soldiers would not go down without a brutal fight if the Americans decided to invade. In spite of the capacity for Japanese soldiers to protect their homeland, and the amount of American lives it would take for the Japanese to surrender, the President still left this as a viable option. It was an option, rather, that would leave the lives of American soldiers out on the battlefield. ...view middle of the document...

If the demonstration failed, Japanese determination and morale might even improve. 8 Even if the bombing demonstration had prevailed, there was no guarantee that simple presentation of arms would be enough to scare the Japanese into surrendering. If that didn’t scare the Japanese enough, then the US would only have one atomic bomb left to use. And as it happened, the use of one atomic bomb was not enough to force the Japanese into surrendering.
Additionally, if the Japanese knew where the atomic test was being performed, then they might have time to ship all of the American POWs to this so called location. The US would not only be failing to convince the Japanese to surrender, but also killing their own soldiers. The US would also be inadvertently taking away the element of surprise. If the Japanese didn’t use the POWs at the test site, then they might have been used as a human shield at Hiroshima. It wouldn’t be difficult to deduce the location in which the US would drop an atomic bomb, due to the lack of conventional bombs dropped in a few cities of Japan.8 “Finally, bomb supporters counter-argue that it was the opinion of Robert Oppenheimer and other scientists on the Interim Committee that a demonstration wouldn’t convince the Japanese to surrender. ‘We can propose no technical demonstration likely to bring an end to the war,’ they wrote. ‘We see no acceptable alternative to direct military use.’” A demonstration of the sheer power of an atomic bomb to possibly save civilian Japanese lives was out of the question. There was no way a favorable outcome or surrender would emerge from a mere presentation of nuclear arms and the power it actually had.
A third alternative instead of dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was to wait for a Russian invasion. This alternative could prove to be effective in finally convincing the Japanese to surrender. It was a known fact that Japan feared the Soviet Union. The United States would often wiretap conversations between the Japanese ambassador stationed in Moscow, and the Japanese Foreign Minister stationed in Tokyo. The United States had broken the Japanese diplomatic code since the beginning of the war, so they listened in on conversations made from Japan to other countries. The Foreign Minister sent a cable on June 4, and it wrote:
“It is a matter of utmost urgency that we should not only prevent Russia from entering the war but should also induce her to adopt a favorable attitude toward Japan. I would therefore like you to miss no favorable opportunity to talk to the Soviet leaders.”
Cabling back to the Foreign Minister in Tokyo, the ambassador wrote how there was not a lot of reason to hope. The ambassador previously heard about the Soviet troop and supply movements heading towards Japan. The cable continued:
“If Russia by some chance should suddenly decide to take advantage of our weakness and intervene against us with force of arms, we would be in a completely hopeless...

Find Another Essay On Was the bomb justified?

Why was the Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb Justified? Works Cited included

589 words - 2 pages The year was 1945. Germany had surrendered, and Japan was the only Axis power left. After the Potsdam conference, President Truman realized that he had the power to end the war. The decision was his. On August 6, Truman authorized the use of the atomic bomb, the first of its kind in existence. Truman was justified in the use of the atomic bomb, for many reasons. The dropping of the bomb would save American lives, make a quick end to the war, and

Was Harry Truman justified in deciding to use the atomis bomb?

548 words - 2 pages to harness the energy of the atom in a chain reaction to produce a bomb that could be carried by aircraft if possible, and to produce it before the Germans did. So long as the success of the project remained in doubt there seems to have been little or no discussion of the effects of an atomic weapon or the circumstances under which it would be used.There was a special committee, known as the Intermin Committee, and it played a vital role in the

Was the Vietnam War Justified?

6173 words - 25 pages Introduction “No event in American history is more misunderstood than the Vietnam War.” (Richard M. Nixon, 1985) Despite almost half a century of retrospect, numerous studies, and the declassification of military documents, former President Nixon’s assertion still holds truth. Of all the wars that the United States has fought in, the Vietnam War has compelled the most Americans to question what we were fighting for and why. Was the Vietnam

Was the atomic bomb nessary

1192 words - 5 pages Atomic Bomb Necessary .... Was it Necessary? August 6th, 1945, 70,000 lives were ended in a matter of seconds. The United States had dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. Today many argue over whether or not the US should have taken such a drastic measure. Was it entirely necessary that we drop such a devastating weapon? Yes, it was.First, we must look at what was going on at the time the decision was made. The US had been

Why was the atomic bomb was used?

1211 words - 5 pages On 6th August 1945, the first of the two fatal bombs was dropped on the army base of Hiroshima. Three days later on the 9th August, the second was dropped on Nagasaki. Both bombs caused widespread damage to Japan, and the knock on effects of radiation have caused the number of those killed to increase every year since 1945, totalling nearly 240,000 deaths. Therefore, those who designed and invented the bomb must have had strong reasons as to why

Was the Battle of the Somme Justified?

2181 words - 9 pages killed, new weapons used, tactics sometimes succeeded sometimes failed but after all was this battle justified? No, it was not justified because of the lots but not successful tactics from the Allied side. Because of their aim that failed of ending, the stalemate on the Western front and driving the German forces away from Verdun. Instead, it ended up with carnage, and lastly their use of soldiers that were not trained for battle and the use of

Was the taxation of the colonists justified?

748 words - 3 pages One of the many repercussions of the French and Indian war was that Great Britain had accumulated an enormous amount of war debt. The British needed to pay this off and thought it would only be fair if the Colonies repaid the war debt. The settlers in the Colonies were the ones who had caused the war and were the ones who benefited from it the most so the decision to implement taxes on the people of the colonies was completely justified. These

Was The Reign of Terror Justified?

1182 words - 5 pages speak of our topic with more knowledge of terms typically used for this subject, we can address the pending question. Was The Reign of Terror justified? An outstanding amount of people died for good and bad reasons. Every system was corrupt, there was practically no right and wrong; no order, just rebellion. Several conflicting arguments can be made, but there is a definite decision to make in this situation. July of the year 1789 was assigned

Was the war in Vietnam justified?

1061 words - 5 pages Was the war in Vietnam justified? The Vietnam War was the longest war in the history of the United States it lasted from 1959-1975. Billions of dollars was spent trying to win and unwinnable war. Countless of lives were lost and America failed to achieve its objective. The origins of the war stem from the Indochina wars that occurred in the late 40s and early 50s. After many years of colonial war, the Viet Minh a communist group led by Ho Chi

was the atomic bomb on japan necessary

1570 words - 6 pages The Atomic Bomb: Unnecessary and Pointless?"In time we hate that which we often fear"1. This was said 500 years ago by William Shakespeare, which precisely sums up the turmoil our world, faces today. It has been almost 67 years after which one of the most significant events had taken place, which shaped the world we live in now, and not a day goes by when we humans don't forget. On the 6th and 9th of august 1945 the United States of America

The War Of 1812: Was The War Of 1812 Justified?

1126 words - 5 pages For America, the War of 1812 was justified. Clearly there were sufficient reasons for America to declare war with Great Britain. Time after time the British violated American rights and freedoms. Acts such as impressments, the attack on the USS Chesapeake, the violation of American neutral rights and waters, blockades on U.S. ports, and the ignoring of stipulations of Jay's Treaty and their Treaty of Paris all imposed threats on America. To

Similar Essays

Was The Bomb Dropped On Japan Justified?

637 words - 3 pages On July 25, 1945, President Truman ordered the military to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. The United States warned Japan that they would face "prompt and utter destruction" unless Japan surrenders. Japan refused. On August 6, Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb named Little Boy over Hiroshima, an important military base. Japan still did not surrender. On August 9, the second bomb named Fat Man was released on Nagasaki. By the end of the year

The Bomb Of The 20th Century: Was It Justified?

879 words - 4 pages understand the atomic bomb from the lens of those affected. As an American writing for Americans, he can narrate a provocative book explaining events that happened to an enemy of America without being subject to xenophobia. In Hiroshima, John Hersey effectively establishes that the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was exceedingly destructive by explaining the chaos unleashed on the Japanese. He achieves this by excluding his opinions and increasing his

Was The Use Of The Atomic Bomb Justified?

845 words - 3 pages During World War II Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and ruined many of our fleets and military. The decision on what to do to deal with Japan was a tough one. America made the right decision on dropping the atomic bomb on Japan.The atomic bomb was necessary in order to assure the war would end as soon as possible. On August 6th the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, on august 9th a second one was dropped on Nagasaki, and on August 10th

Was Truman Justified In Dropping The Atom Bomb?

2312 words - 9 pages The order to use atomic weapons against another country has only been carried out once in the entire history of the world. The invention of nuclear weaponry impacted the worlds' arsenals in a way that no other weapon had; the A-bomb was a super bomb, the first in its class. President Harry S. Truman - unexpectedly thrust into the position of Chief of Command - was confronted with the raging World War II and the creation of this new mystery