This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Was The Russian Government Policy Towards The Peasants And The Workers In Russia From 1801 1905 A Major Cause For The Outbreak Of Revolution In 1905?

1773 words - 7 pages

A brilliant civil servant in the reign of Alexander I, Speransky, pointed out that there were only two estates in Russia: the slaves of the Sovereign and the slaves of the landlord. The former are called free in relation to the latter; but in fact there were no free men in Russia, except the beggars and the philosophers. That is to say, throughout the 19th century, the peasants who were mostly serfs, contributed the majority of the population in Russia. During the period of 1801-1905, the main government policy towards the peasants was to emancipate the serfs, though the degree of carrying out this emancipation policy was quite different from Tsar to Tsar.In 1801, Alexander I came to the throne. In this early years of Czardom, he was influenced by Speransky and took the emancipation of the serfs as his major concern in his reform programme. In 1803, he issued an edict that the landowners could, if they wished, emancipate the serfs with land allotments. This resulted in emancipation of about 50,000 peasants. Then between 1816 and 1819, serfs in the Baltic provinces were also liberated with their legal rights clarified and improved. Besides, the sale of serfs as substitutes for army recruits was ended. Even when Speransky was replaced by the "narrow-minded conservative", Arakeheev, the Tsar still opposed to serfdom. In 1818, Arakeheev was asked to prepare for the emancipation of the serfs. The sale of serfs without land, except in Estonia, Courland and Lavonia was forbidden.Alexander I's emancipation policy was genuine. However, as H.L. Ellison had said, "The will to transform the condition of the peasants remained strong, but the visible means of making major changes were lack of." Thus, the status and the situation of the majority of peasants remained unchanged whereas in the Baltic provinces the conditions of the serfs were worsened for most of the land was still retained by the nobles. When in 1820, the spread of European revolution had convinced Alexander I that encouragement given to liberalism was at the same time encouraging revolution. He turned to reactionary.When Nicholas II became the Tsar in 1825, the pressure for the abolition of serfdom grew rapidly. The landowners were greatly in debt. In order to get more income, the rate of production must be increased. Yet this was hindered by the existence of an excess inefficient serf labour. The demand for free wage labour was greatly intensified when exports of grain increased and extensive markets grew in number. Emancipation of the serfs more effectively became inevitable. Therefore, by 1835, Nicholas I convinced that "Serfdom is a powder cellar under the State", set up secret committees to examine the means for the abolition of the serfs. At that time, the State peasants were allowed to be freed of personal servitude. They could use land in exchange for labour service or "obrok" (rent). But this statute failed to be effective.Nicholas I's policy towards the State peasants was a bit...

Find Another Essay On Was the Russian government policy towards the peasants and the workers in Russia from 1801-1905 a major cause for the outbreak of revolution in 1905?

Russia Did the 1905 Revolution fail?

699 words - 3 pages manifesto promising a wider franchise and legislative powers for the Duma. This satisfied the Liberals and divided them from the workers in the Soviet. The government was then able to suppress the revolution. The leaders of the Soviet were arrested and the rising in Moscow was brutally suppressed.Tsarist Russia had been shaken by the 1905 Revolution but it did recover, however it never fully regained the loyalty that it had lost on 'Bloody Sunday

The Revolution of 1905: The First Russian Revolution

4216 words - 17 pages certainly was a racist element here)--was high atop any such list. In mid-1904, a popular Russian Orthodox priest, Georgi Gapon, organized thousands of St. Petersburg workers into his Assembly of Russian Factory Workers, an association originally financed and approved by the government to minimize the influence of radicals among the workers and bolster the credibility of the autocracy by providing an outlet for worker grievances. However, despite

Discuss why there was a revolution in Russia in 1905

762 words - 3 pages Revolution of 1905. The cause of this war was both Russia and Japan's concern over trading and naval rights in Korea and Manchuria. Japan wanted to weaken Russia's power in east Asia. However, Russia underestimated Japan's compact power. It was forced to divert the attention from its internal problems to this war. The Russian government had a very large amount of oversea debts already due to the rapid government-planned industrialization. But

The 1905 Revolution

1102 words - 4 pages particularly horrified reaction. Then it forced liberals into an alliance with the lover orders to achieve a revolutionary resolution. In the summer on 1905 the Russian government seemed scarily close to losing control of the whole situation. The loss of the Russian fleet at the straights Tsushima on 14th May was for many the final straw.Russia went through a genuine revolution between 1904 and 1907. The population was involved in spontaneous

Causes of the 1905 Revolution

1411 words - 6 pages thought that they were one of the most important part of the population in Russia. The Peasants got jealous, at the Aristocracy, which was one of the points for all the rebelling and protesting. From the late 19th century, Russian Tsars had been keen for Russia, to become an industrial power. Policies were introduced that led to a rapid industrial growth, some Peasants left the land to work in these new industries

How accurate is it to say that the growth of reformist groups in the years 1881 was the main cause of the 1905 revolution?

1027 words - 4 pages accurate. Reformist groups did play a role in the revolution but other factors like the Russo Japanese War, Industrialisation and the further discontent felt by the civilians in Russia also contributed to the outbreak of the 1905 revolution.The growth of reformist groups was a factor that made an impression towards the outbreak of the 1905 revolution. The assassination of Alexander II had the consequences of creating inspiration for other

Why did the Revolution of 1905 occur?

1272 words - 5 pages lashes from the government like Bloody Sunday With the concentration of such a group of upset workers in one city, under the given circumstances, the revolution was thus unavoidable.Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 in which Russia lost control over Korea and Manchuria to Japan, along with 125, 000 men (killed or wounded), mostly the czar's well trusted navy, was the last straw that prompted the Russian

The Russian revolution was a major event in world history

1559 words - 6 pages would undermine the Russian war effort.Active as a politico-military leader on various fronts during the Civil War of 1918?20, Stalin also held two ministerial posts in the new Bolshevik government, being commissar for nationalities (1917?23) and for state control (or workers' and peasants' inspection; 1919?23). But it was his position as secretary general of the party's Central Committee, from 1922 until his death that provided the power base for

What caused the 1905 Russian uprising?

718 words - 3 pages the Constitutional Democratic Party. While the Social Democrats who took part in the Bloody Sunday continued to fight for social reform.There were many factors that caused a revolution in 1905. Low moral after the Russo-Japanese War, poverty and horrible working conditions, a corrupt and power-hungry government, and the outcome of "Bloody Sunday" all contributed to the Russian Revolution. But the unrest did not end there; it continued again in

Tsar Nicholas 2nd's Survival of The 1905 Revolution

1506 words - 6 pages already relaxed within government), freedom of the press and a promise to incorporate a bicameral legislative parliament in 1906. Struve and Miliukov (the respective heads of the liberal parties) accepted this constitution of behalf of the workers, deciding to with hold any criticism for the time it was released in case it did not live up to the standards promised. For the liberals this was a huge step towards a more

Why did the Revolution fail to topple the Tsar in 1905, but succeed in 1917?

1670 words - 7 pages a time of change in Russia. Over the forty years preceding 1905, and thirty years following 1917, the Russian Empire underwent huge transformations. This meant that though many events can be seen as part of the Revolution, much of them happened against different backdrops within the country.Nicholas II did not abdicate and was not dethroned in 1905. However the Revolution of February 1917 did remove him from his position. When asking why

Similar Essays

The 1905 Russian Revolution Essay

968 words - 4 pages reign as an autocrat. However this revolution was an indication of the power of the people and it can be said that it was a dress rehearsal for the February and October revolutions of 1917.There are many reasons for the outbreak of the revolution in 1905, most of which are related to the events of the year itself. The agitation and unrest of the Russian people began to show itself when the war against Japan began in February of 1904. It was thought

The Cause Of The 1905 Russian Revolution History Essay

2181 words - 9 pages Soviet interpretation, most likely written under some political constraints. The assertions of this interpretation are that the workers “had grown into an independent political force” and that the “revolution aimed at the overthrow of the tsarist monarchy” with implications that industrialisation in the late 19th century was the cause of the development of the proletariat. Although by 1905 Russia was one of the major economic powers, ranking fourth

Origin Of The 1905 Russian Revolution

3401 words - 14 pages revolution. The Russo-Japanese War was a military disaster for Russia. More so, it became a domestic disaster for Russia's governing body. This conflict solidified the perception of the Russian autocratic government as "irresponsible, incompetent, and reckless." The war with Japan did not result from fundamental conflicts over national interests. The basic cause of this war was Russia's imprudent expansionist policies in the Far East

Why Did The 1905 Russian Revolution Break Out, And How Significant Was The 1905 Revolution In Bringing About Political Change By 1912?

859 words - 3 pages the public opinion that the war with Japan had been completely unnecessary, created unrest among the Russian population, and many of those who were upset blamed the Tsar.On January 9th 1905 the Leader of the Assembly of Russian Factory Workers, Father Gapon, led 150,000 workers to the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg to hand the Tsar (also known to the people as the "Little Father" of Russia) a petition asking for the release of political prisoners