We Cannot Permit Infringements On Privacy

3898 words - 16 pages

George Orwell foresees a nightmarish-future for the world in his book 1984, where individualism loses precedence to "the good of society," and with it goes the individual's private life. "The [controlling] Party" in the socialist government knows the intimate details of all citizens, and prosecutes those who violate social orders through threatening speech, behavior or thoughts. The omnipresent visual warning "Big Brother is Watching You,” reminds citizens that no personal information is safe from the "Thought Police." While this may seem far-fetched to some, Orwell envisioned technology facilitating government's abuse of power in 1950; in the twenty-first century, progress has left one's private life susceptible to interested parties in both the public and private sectors. In 1997, Ralph Nader cautioned, "The people are not organized not equipped with the knowledge, tools or skills to confront the invasions of the self they can see, let alone the far greater, more subterranean kinds of surveillance" (viii). With the rise of computers to their current capabilities, collecting, storing, accessing and sharing personal data has become easier than ever before: governments and companies no longer keep files of paper records on individuals, which accessing, stealing or sharing would be too arduous a task, but rather electronic databases that they can easily create, access and link. Ellen Alderman and Caroline Kennedy note in their book The Right to Privacy, "From a privacy point of view, we are in the midst of the most unsettling period in [the computer] revolution" (326). Computers do not threaten personal privacy, though, nor violate any right granted to Americans: the word 'privacy' does not appear in the Constitution, nor does the phrase "right to privacy." As Americans, we have assumed a protection of personal information, but no laws prohibit any parties from utilizing technology in a profiting, benefiting or malicious way. The issue of personal privacy should alarm Americans to focus on established privacy in America, infringements on privacy and efforts aiming at protecting personal information in lieu of a right to privacy.

Privacy has been legally established in the United States over the course of its history mostly through Congressional Acts and Supreme Court decisions: specific privacy rights are not stated in the Constitution, and several amendments have been interpreted as giving privacy rights. In 1974 Congress passed into law the Privacy Act, which "protects records that can be retrieved by personal identifiers such as a name, social security number, or other identifying number or symbol," and also grants access to personal information for the purpose of correcting any inaccuracies. While the act prevents the disclosure of personal information, this stipulation has twelve exceptions; furthermore, only Federal databases are subject to the Privacy Act. Considering the "liberties" given to citizens by the Act and its two significant...

Find Another Essay On We Cannot Permit Infringements on Privacy

Legal and Copyright Essay

1499 words - 6 pages ), enforcing those who covertly bypass “digital” copyright infringements with an envision of not being detected through encryption (Spinello, 2011). On the other hand, when one looks the advancement of encryption technology, it is not controversial when acknowledging a correlation between algorithm skill sets in cyber space versus the encryption of a key, which is a cipher unit that is changeable while simultaneously preserving confidentiality

Employees' Rights in the Workplace Essay

1046 words - 4 pages the reasonableness of the employee's expectation of privacy against the business interest of the employer in monitoring the communication. However, it is important to emphasize that in the final analysis courts have traditionally held that legitimate business interests permit employers to intercept communications. Additionally, state constitutions might provide some protection. A number of state constitutions provide a specific right of

Data Mining and the US Government

4283 words - 17 pages could have prevented that from happening. That's something you list as an infringement on privacy, but what do you say to the victims and the families of the 3000 people who died that day?"[27] We must ask ourselves if the government's pursuit of national security is more important, or their preservation of individual privacy is more important. As technology advances into a more secure state, issues of privacy infringements will eventually

is privacy in the 21st century possible?

1191 words - 5 pages the ECPA on technology since it was created, in 1986. When the ECPA was created there was no "World Wide Web", social networking was something in the future, and nothing was stored in what we call the "cloud." With all the technological changes in today's society no one is protected. Privacy is defined as being free from the public eye. Yet we have so many people sharing personal information on social networking websites, and government agencies

Can the world be rid of terrorism without damaging the civil rights of citizens?

3056 words - 12 pages multicultural nations. These two nations boast of their diversity openly and see it as a wonderful part of their free and democratic status in the world. In order to stop terrorists from entering our nation, we need to put restraints on immigration. People entering from countries known to harbor terrorists cannot be allowed access to out land. This must go for everyone if we are to protect our society, not just those we think might be terrorists

Security vs Privacy

771 words - 4 pages two pieces of evidences that it does not even weaken the article as much. Cillizza’s article relies mostly on political characters to persuade the readers that the government has the right to intrude into our privacy. One of the strengths this article is that he uses big known people convince the readers. For example, from paragraph 5 to 7, he gives a quote from Obama saying “I can talk broadly about the balance that we have…..” Even do this

Lack of Privacy in the United States

1095 words - 4 pages search in their personal lives. Privacy matters for the people even if there is noting to hide. Numerous discussions are going on the nothing-to-hide argument. This argument applies not to all personal information but only to the type of data the government is likely to gather. It concenters on just one or two specific kinds of privacy, telling to people of personal information or secretly recording and watching people while ignoring the others


655 words - 3 pages that a fence in the front should of the property should be no higher than four feet high. A fence in the back should be six feet high. You may be able to install a higher fence, but you would need special permission and a permit. If a permit is needed, you must be in possession of the permit before work begins. You cannot apply for a permit over the phone, Internet, or mail, it must be done in person. Usually, the fencing company will take care of

Analysis of Jeffery Rosen's: The Naked Crowd

1118 words - 5 pages on the subject, “has led us to value exposure over privacy? Why, in short, are we so eager to become members of the Naked Crowd, in which we have the illusion of belonging only when we are exposed?”(Rosen) he states that we value exposure over privacy, and will give away privacy to fit in. Rosen makes the argument that people surrender all privacy through “self-revelation” (Rosen), they destroy their privacy to fit in with society and to join the

The Right To Privacy in India

3981 words - 16 pages ', one cannot have a rational discussion without having a common understanding of the terms .Furthermore, what do we mean by 'degree of privacy'? The standards of privacy vary very widely from culture to culture and therefore even the law must accordingly fit into the standards of the society. The standards of privacy which a person living in the densely populated slums of Mumbai finds acceptable are totally different from the standards which the

How the Growth of Electronic Monitoring Has Changed Employee Expectations of Privacy in the Workplace

1294 words - 5 pages to a corporation, such as copyright infringement on intellectual property, and/or the viewing of unacceptable images leading to sexual harassment suits. Internally at a corporation, it can mandate oversight of usage to protect itself from such misuse and can state the practice thereof. For criminal prosecution however, the burden of enforcement requires certain infringements of privacy rights but not outside of the rule of law. The

Similar Essays

What Exactly Is A ‘Surveillance Society’?

567 words - 2 pages tentacles of state reaching out and seize totalitarian control (2000: 326). However, the potential for such control cannot be ignored. This is especially pertinent now that the technology has arrived to permit issuing of electronic ID cards and complete profiles. Best refers to several public opinion surveys that suggest people are somewhat concerned with infringements on their privacy, brought about by increasing surveillance and data

Privacy Infringements Through The Internet Essay

2317 words - 9 pages , there are steps that can be taken to prevent infringements of a person’s privacy and information. One simply has to know how to make an informed choice on how and whether to share your personal information (Dinev). This process begins with the observations concerning an average person’s desires involving privacy. Not everyone cares about spending hundreds of dollars for maximum security or military level precision software that they probably

American Fundamental Values Essay

1737 words - 7 pages Texas law is unconstitutional, which is interpreted that homosexuality is protected under the Constitution (Henkle, 2013.) America lacks agreement on privacy make the future of privacy a questionable issue, therefore arguments will continue and the president will appoint judges who share their beliefs on the issues (Wemmer, 2012.) A big problem in age that challenges privacy is electronics.as we are in the age of technology, it alters the

Unreasonable Searches By Police Are Illegal

846 words - 3 pages No one should be searched without a good reason and warrant. People should have the right of privacy- it is important to them. It is ethical for police to have search warrants before searching a person’s personal belongings. There have been recent conflicts on police powers over the pass years. Police are disobeying the fourth amendment by searching illegally. Critics frown upon police, while supporters agree with the police. Being