This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

We Should Allow Drilling In The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Anwr)

2526 words - 10 pages

Over the last thirty years the United States has been faced with the problem of dependence on foreign countries for oil and the tight control that these exercise on the energy policies and economics of America. Many of these instances include: the oil embargos of the 1970s, the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990, and the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 2001. Since the 1970s, one solution offered to reduce our nation's dependence on foreign countries for oil has been opening up drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Proponents say that drilling in ANWR would make the United States more self-sufficient in the area of energy, while at the same time not doing excessive damage to the environment of the area. Opponents of drilling in ANWR cite the environmental problems of off-shore drilling and maintain that this land should be left alone and allowed to stand as an environmental wonder. Given that some environmental groups do not mind allowing technology to invade the environment when it profits them and given the threats of global terror and the ever-increasing dependence our nation has on foreign oil, I believe it is in the best interests of the United States to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil drilling.

     Before stating both sides of the argument, I would like to make two observations that I found interesting while researching from the book, Taking Sides. The first thing that I found interesting was that in an environmental science class and in an environmental science textbook, the two articles used to present the pros and cons of opening up oil drilling in ANWR were not written by environmentalists or scientists or even oil technology experts, but rather by an economist, a physicist and a lawyer. The second thing that ran through my head as I was reading both articles was the time at which both were written. ?To Drill or Not to Drill: Let the Environmentalist Decide,? written by Dwight R. Lee, a professor of economics, and ?Fools Gold in Alaska,? written by physicist Amory B. Lovins and lawyer L. Hunter Lovins, were both written in the months prior to the September eleventh terrorist attacks in the United States and the subsequent United States invasion of both Afghanistan and Iraq. As I read both articles, especially that of the Lovins, which opposes oil drilling in ANWR, I could not help but wonder if each of the three men would either have different views or in the case of Lee a different argument for his views, if they had to write their articles post 9/11. Another interesting fact about ANWR is that, ?ANWR is home to one of the world?s largest caribou herds as well as 200 other wildlife and plant species.? (Cunningham, William P. Cunningham, Mary Ann and Saigo, Barbara, pg. 413)

     My argument in favor of opening up oil drilling in ANWR is based on two things: the questionable conclusions that the Lovins article draws from past energy policies and the latest factual and no-so...

Find Another Essay On We Should Allow Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR)

Opponents to Drilling in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

1577 words - 7 pages “The conversation of our natural resources and their proper use underlines almost every other problem in our national life,” Theodore Roosevelt. Americans’ dependence upon petroleum-based energy sources has required the United States to consider a variety of options to fulfill [the] ever-increasing energy needs, even drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR] (Smith). The controversial question on whether or not to drill in the

Oil Drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge

1181 words - 5 pages The Alaska National Wildlife Refuge is one of the most pristine environmental areas in our country, but it also is an area that contains the largest oil reserve in the entire US. This has led to a very intense and complicated debate as to whether we should preserve this area or allow oil extraction. Environmentalists, conservationists, preservationists, as well as many others who care for the environment are against the oil industries getting

Oil Drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge

1992 words - 8 pages Oil Drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge The main issue presented in my research involves the debate between environmentalists and the United States government on whether to open and develop a portion of the Artic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in the northern coastal plain of Alaska for the purpose of drilling for oil. Environmentalists argue that opening up this region of ANWR to future oil drilling would destroy the current

The Artic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) vs. Oil

2828 words - 11 pages artic and sub artic land remains intact and is kept that way. It is located in the northeastern corner of Alaska, and is considered the ?crown jewel? of America?s National Wildlife Refuge System. The ANWR provides quarters for many species of wildlife including 130 types of migratory birds, two types of caribou ( porcupine and central artic), three types of bears (polar, grizzly and black bears), wolves, muskoxen, Dall sheep, arctic and red foxes

America Must Drill for Oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

880 words - 4 pages America is depending too much on foreign trade. Drilling for oil in Alaska will solve these problems. There are ways of drilling without disturbing the environment and keeping the animals in their original habitat. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) is a large piece of land in Alaska. It is an 18 million acre piece of land where the weather reaches only 4 degrees Celsius in the summer and below 20 degrees Celsius in the winters

Environmental Views of Arctic National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR)

2466 words - 10 pages drilling in that area. Here are some statements written by Alaskan people with their reasons of why the monument should be declared. ( “The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a national treasure and it is America’s last unspoiled wilderness. The Arctic Refuge is home to rare wildlife, including polar bears, and it would only provide enough oil for 180 days of U.S. consumption. We should

Oil Drilling Should Not Be Allowed in the Artic National Wildlife Reserve

1284 words - 5 pages realize that destroying ANWR will only solve the problem for a while, and create more problems for the wildlife in that area. Destroying a one of a kind wilderness, that has been untouched for millenniums, to suffice America's oil addiction for a decade is defiantly not a step that America should be taking.Works CitedBarringer, Felicity. "Predictions Vary for Refuge As Drilling Plan Develops." The New York Times 20 March 2005 MAS Ultra - School Edition

Should We Drill In The Arctic?

1174 words - 5 pages Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, an enormous piece of land located in the Northeast of Alaska, is believe to contains about a billions of barrels of oil. If the United States are willing to drill in the ANWR, this would lead to trade deficit because foreign policy would change and we can't do anything about it, just "last year our oil trade deficit was $51 billion" (1). The "area of ANWR can potentially produce 1.5 million barrels of oil per day

Should We Allow The Smoking in Public Areas?

795 words - 4 pages The war of smoking among the smokers and the other people will not find a solution so far. The smokers have viewpoint says that they should have rights and be allowed to choose where and when they wish to smoke like any body's have this human rights. However, In my opinion smoking should be banned completely for many causes. First, smoking can causes a big health problems to the smokers themselves and to the other people how inhaling the

Should We Allow Creationism In Schools

731 words - 3 pages First, my strengths to my speech were the following: Good supporting facts, quotes, organization, strong cites, and good movement and gestures. Although, each need a little work I feel as if I excelled in these categories once again. The memorable remark may have been the most powerful part of my speech a great quote given by Penny Higgins. We should not allow religious belief such as creationism to be taught in science classrooms as a credible

Should We Allow Illegal Immigration?

828 words - 4 pages Yes, we should allow illegal immigration. The most significant problem in blocking illegal immigration is how expensive everything is. From trying to run across the border, $350 (USD) for the migrants, to creating a bill, $46.3 billion for the citizens, it will sink a hole in our, and their, wallets. From watching a Discovery Channel video in class, we were able to learn the many immigrants spend $350 to try and run across the border every day

Similar Essays

Drilling In The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

2715 words - 11 pages environmental damage, drilling in ANWR should not be conducted. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a 19,300,000 acre refuge in northeast Alaska; it is the largest wilderness area in the United States and is managed by the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. The refuge was created under the Public Land Order 2214 in 1960, and was expanded in 1980 through the Alaska National Interest Land Conservation Act (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). This

The Consequences Of Drilling In The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

1062 words - 4 pages ). Consequently, it is safe to conclude that drilling more is not the solution to reduce gas prices, but instead, the cause of a bigger problem. In the event that the Unites States does decide to drill in the Arctic National Wildfire Refuge, it will inform the oil market about how serious we are concerning domestic supplies. This apprehension will create panic between the international suppliers which may cause prices to go down. Unfortunately, no

No Oil Drilling In The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

1067 words - 4 pages . Americans and native Alaskans must endorse and implement an environmental law to support wildlife population. Or else overwhelming effects will follow. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, more commonly known as the ANWR , and other barren lands in Alaska, has a history of combating oil production. In 1923, twenty-three million acres of land was set aside an oil reserve, which became the Naval Petroleum Reserve number four, but later the name

What Is The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Anwr)?

1245 words - 5 pages The Environment or Oil?The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) is known as the second largest in the National Wildlife Refuge System. The ANWR covers approximately 19.6 million acres of land in northeast Alaska. It is also a home to many animals and species that depend on this as a vital habitat for their survival. Many environmental preservationists believe that the ANWR is one of the nation's last true forms of wilderness remaining, and