Guns Don't Kill People, Criminals Do

1205 words - 5 pages

Guns Don't Kill People - Criminals Do

 
   It's late at night, and you're home all alone.  You double checked to make

sure all of the doors were locked and made sure all of the windows were closed.

It's been a quiet night, but for some odd reason you cannot sleep.  During your

restless night, you hear a bump in the kitchen.  At first you dismiss it as the

wind.  But there it is again, and it's louder this time.  You're scared, your

pulse is racing and you cannot think of what to do.  You don't know whether to

call 911 or just lay there and hope whatever it was will go away.  But then you

realize you have a 9-mm Smith and Wesson hand gun in the nightstand.  You

quietly get it out, take off the trigger lock, and retrieve the bullets from on

top of your dresser.  You don't want to create a situation that isn't necessary

so you huddle next to your bed and hope whomever it is takes what they want and

leaves.  You hear them walking down the hallway toward you.  Your bladder nearly

lets go.  The intruder tries to open your door but luckily you locked it.

There still is the possibility that it's your spouse so you don't shoot the

intruder through the door.  Then the intruder kicks the door in, sending

splinters of wood flying about the room.  The time has come, you raise from the

side of your bed, instinctively assuming a marksman's pose and fire just as the

intruder is raising his weapon.  He flies back against the wall and slumps into

a lifeless pile.  You then proceed to call 911.

 

               Now, that is not an uncommon scenario in the present state of society.

Now what I ask you to picture is that same scenario, but this time only the

intruder has a weapon because all guns have been outlawed and the criminal is

the only person who can get their  hands on them.  It's a rather scary thought,

isn't it.  But that is exactly what some people want.  They want a ban on all

firearms.  But that is not the solution, the solution is the education of every

person that purchases a firearm and required trigger locks, and stricter

compliance by judges to the sentences mandated for crimes involving firearms.

 

               The "most recent attempt at federal gun legislation was the Gun Control

Act of 1968" (Goldwater 183) and has done little if anything to lower the number

of crimes committed using firearms.  In fact, "the number of shooting homicides

per year has climbed steadily since it's enactment, while armed robberies have

increased 60 percent." (183).  Now, this is a staggering piece of information.

But it's just one piece of evidence that shows that gun control laws are only

marginally effective, if at all, in curtailing crimes involving firearms.

 

               Now, I am not saying that there should be absolutely no restrictions on

who has a fire arm, because that is not true.  "Most everyone will agree that

felons, addicts,...

Find Another Essay On Guns Don't Kill People, Criminals Do

Gun control, this essay goes over why gun control could be a good or bad thing

1016 words - 4 pages never happen so they think that the buyers should be limited not the guns. Their motto is "Guns don't kill people, people kill people". common sense dictates that this statement works. If somebody wants to kill you, they will do it with gun or without a gun. Yet, in real life statistics prove gun homicide rates are not high compared to gun accident rates. The Gun Control advocates believe that handguns and semi-automatic long guns should be banned

Guns Divide Society Essay

888 words - 4 pages ). Lott's point is that, if we had more guns with the peaceful citizens than crime rate would go down and criminals would think hundreds of times before they commit any action. However, some people say that it is the police responsibility to protect people and whenever you expose an attack just call the police. I disagree with that because if the victim could call the police, which may not happen, by the time they respond the criminal would kill the

An Argument Against Gun Control

899 words - 4 pages A proposed federal law to outlaw all guns would be more effective at disarming law-abiding citizens than at disarming the criminals who abuse them. If guns were outlawed, the criminals would not stop carrying guns, but the good, law-abiding citizens would. It would do nothing about the illegally obtained handguns in the possession of criminals. In The NRA is Right, Josh Sugarmann states that “One tenet of the National Rifle

Gun Control Laws Take Guns Away from Law-abiding Citizens

1347 words - 5 pages , brass knuckles, or, for that matter fists would be used to kill people. "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" (Zimring 14). The black market is open to anyone with money without discrimination of age, race, gender, or background (Zimring 55). Gun control laws do not even include criminals, unless they try to work through the legal system. The only people who are affected by gun control laws are law -abiding citizens who are trying to

Making owning guns illegal

662 words - 3 pages . States that allow more freedom of weapons see that those areas see a lot less crime because people are more protected and criminals think twice before they attempt to harm someone who has a gun. Second of all, people who use guns to kill usually obtain them illegally in the first place. It’s usually people already with a violent criminal history or mental history that commit most of these crimes using guns. People should be checked once every

Persuasive Speech: Against Gun Control

1264 words - 5 pages shooting sports. As you can see if guns were eliminated from our society we would be at a serious loss. Our freedoms would be in jeopardy, our individual safety would be questionable and a significant industry in our country would be at a deficit. The quote that "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is even more pertinent today. . It is time that each individual takes responsibilities for his

Gun control.

883 words - 4 pages it our right to own guns for protection against a overbearing government, but also against those who intend to infringe on the peoples security. The criminals don't care about gun control laws for themselves. Actually, they are hoping for more laws will pass for gun control. It makes breaking the law safer and easier for them. A common belief is that people don't need guns because we have the police to protect us. In most cases the police ca not

An Argument Against Gun Control

858 words - 3 pages controlling firearms will lesson criminal action. Gun control does nothing to control criminals. The fundamental flaw in the thinking of anti-gun polititions is that guns don't kill people. People kill people. The same logic that leads one to control firearms could also lead one to endeavor to control automobiles and fast food simply because they are instrumental in millions of deaths per year. Why when Americans reject

"Firearm ownership tends to be one of the main factors which leads to violent gun crime"

1228 words - 5 pages people are tended to do things, if possessing a gun, that couldn't have done if not. Someone that has a gun is much supposed to do a robbery that someone else who doesn't. Still, guns don't kill people, they kill each other. The safety of people depends on more than lows. It depends on the values people have and on their culture acquired during their life time [12].People who do not support firearm ownership are mostly afraid of the black market

Commonsense Control, Not Gun Control

1281 words - 5 pages , an ice pick, a baseball bat.' (Goldwater 184) A trigger lock will also help to prevent the use of guns in crimes of passion, delaying, if not stopping, the person from using the gun. These might sound like simple solutions to a difficult solution, but they are solutions that will work.Nan Desuka put it best, ''Guns don't kill people - criminals do.' That's a powerful slogan, much more powerful than it's alternate version, 'Guns don't kill people

Gun Control: Law Abiding Citizens Should be Permitted to Have Guns

1258 words - 5 pages is the Brady Bill. The Brady Bill is named after James Brady, who was shot by John Hinckley during an assassination attempt on President Reagan in 1981. Even though this bill was introduced after this incident, it would not have made a difference in the shootings. John Hinckley had a good record with no mental illness and no felony convictions in any jurisdiction, so the public can't say only criminals use guns to kill people. Criminals have lots

Similar Essays

Guns Don't Kill People, Criminals Kill People

1816 words - 7 pages shortcomings vaguely. One of the most relevant works regarding gun control, which perhaps heightened polarization on the issue, is John Lott’s More Guns, Less Crime. The author postulates that law abiding citizens wielding weapons will deter criminals from violent crime (Lott, 1998, p. 58). Lott (1998) analyzes an extensive compilation of statistical data to attest to his theory which claims that counties and states experience a drop in crime

Guns Don't Kill People, People Kill People

1527 words - 6 pages forms of criminals. These people do not obtain guns with the greater good of others in mind, they do so to benefit themselves. They are not properly trained in how to use guns and often times, make decisions that injure or kill the people around them. For these reasons, there are many mixed feelings about guns. Some groups, such as the National Rifle Association, believe everyone should be able to own guns and there should be little guidelines

Guns Don't Kill People. People Kill People.

1015 words - 5 pages , or a handgun for protection in home invasions. In conclusion having stricter gun control laws will not help lower the crime rates across America. They will not lower mass shootings or home invasions, the only thing stricter gun control will accomplish is keeping guns out of the hands of criminals that try to buy a gun legally, but we all know criminals don't buy guns legally they get them from other criminals, or off the black market

"Drugs Don't Kill People, People Who Use Drugs Kill Themselves."

925 words - 4 pages 2002, almost 30 million people 12 years and older in the United States had used prescription pain killers non-medically in their time.The smoke from cannabis contains all the toxic constituents of smoke including irritants, tumor initiator, tumor promoters and carcinogens, and carbon monoxide.Methamphetamine is dangerous not only to the meth user but to society at large. It's estimated that every pound of methamphetamine produced leaves behind 5 to 7 pounds of toxic waste.72% of teen pregnancies are caused by drug and alcohol and 48% of them don't use protection so the risk is greater of contracting STD's.