This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Essay

795 words - 4 pages

Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Weapons of mass destruction are the most powerful weapons ever created. Weapons of mass destruction are a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread annihilation. But according to United States law it also fits in many other weapons in to an extremely broad description of weapons. Nuclear weapons are a major crisis in today’s world as seen in the cold war can cause tensions to rise extremely fast and cause the brink of global warfare once again, or even end all wars by exterminating a vast majority of the human race. Nuclear weapons can cause gigantic casualties on a scale never seen before, and the potential to dramatically affect the course of the human race which is a huge threat unique to the past sixty-six years.
While a vast majority of the world is against weapons of mass destruction, a small minority support them. One reason a person or country may support them is because they feel safer with them. But a country with WMD’s (weapons of mass destruction) can be seen as a threat. Some may even say that they are a needed deterrent to prevent other countries from attacking them. But countries can be only pushed so far until a mistake is made and in the case of nuclear weapons could cause wide spread devastation and retaliation. These are the main reasons some support WMD’s but just be simply removing WMD’s can prevent most the problems that originated with them.
Weapons of mass destruction cause many high stress problems between countries. One of example of an extremely high stress situation occurred shortly after World War II, the Cold War. After the use of the atomic bomb in Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, Russia began researching and mass manufacturing nuclear weapons which caused a large amount of tension between the United States and Russia. “The politicians always told us that the cold war could only change by way of nuclear war. None believed that such a systemic change was possible” (Lech Walesa). The Cold War was around 40 years of high tension, and the only thing that stood between us and destruction was the knowledge that if one side fired both would be destroyed. The United States and Russia came dangerously close to firing nuclear weapons at each other multiple times during the Cold War which would have led to...

Find Another Essay On Weapons of Mass Destruction

Weapons of Mass Destruction: Problems or Solutions?

1610 words - 7 pages ? We must all learn the dangers of weapons of mass destruction to decide which side to stand up for. Government and Military strength has always decided which countries are the best in the world. Now with drones, the development of lasers, and nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, every modern organization is a credible threat. Our way of life is balancing on a gymnast's beam. A big enough push could topple us over the edge. Nuclear power is

Chemical and Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction

1536 words - 7 pages law does not address these issues well enough. International law should be advanced to restrict BWs research programs done in the name of science. CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY Even after the first nuclear weapon was used by the United States in 1945 and the world watched its mass damage on both human being and environment, there have been serious arms race of nuclear weapons and various nuclear experiments by many

Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism

2283 words - 9 pages The whole world is just waiting for the one country, whether it is China, Russia, or North Korea, to set off a nuclear missile that would start a nuclear war and that would only end when there are few survivors left. However, maybe there is another way that a war could have an extreme number of casualties on every continent. The United States Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism believes that

This is about weapons of mass destruction including anthrax etc

1496 words - 6 pages Weapons of Mass DestructionChemical and Biological Warfare, use of harmful or deadly chemical or biological agents as weapons of war. These agents can kill many people and are considered weapons of mass destruction. Chemical weapons are made up of poisonous chemical compounds, whereas biological weapons are living microorganisms. Toxin weapons contain poisonous chemical products of living organisms and are sometimes classified separately

Disarment, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Outer Space: Mongolia´s Stand

1504 words - 7 pages The topics before the First Committee are: Relationship between Disarmament and Development, Measures to prevent Terrorists from acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction, Prevention of arms Race in Outer Space. Mongolia is dedicated to collaborative

Gruinard Island: Weapon of Mass Destruction

1260 words - 5 pages Gruinard Island is just one metaphoric piece of debris left over from the fallout and effects of Germany during World War 2 (WW2). This is just another testimony to the underappreciated fear of the invisible killer, the quiet storm and the science of the dragon’s breath also know as Weapons of Mass Destruction. This example is played out on the island of Gruinard merely a proving ground in fear of Germany’s biological program. Gruinard Island

Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the Automobile

3811 words - 15 pages Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the Automobile Mitigation, to the dismay of some, has become publicly synonymous with notions of preservation and conservation. Mitigation is neither the ‘preservation’ nor is it the ‘conservation’ of habitat. Mitigation is the creation of new habitat, or the guarding of an existing habitat to "make up" for the destruction of similar habitat somewhere else. It was the infamous environmental buzz

Nuclear Energy: Substitution for Oil or a Possible Source of Mass Destruction

2333 words - 9 pages all propositions and to grab an attention. The expanding of the nuclear industry seems to be the most offered. This type of energy is considered very efficient, productive, and much cheaper than other types. However, the possibility of nuclear energy becoming the source of mass destruction instead of a substitution for oil should make the world look at the problem much closer and to think twice.Nuclear radiation was discovered more than hundred

The Huxley Vision: Weapons of Mass Distraction

961 words - 4 pages Humanity has always been fascinated by books which provide us with an apocalyptic view of the future. The destruction of a nation; the fall of our government—or in Huxley’s vision, its rise to power in formidable ways. As Huxley puts it, “the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance…[and humanity] would be reduced to passivity and egoism.” In contemporary America, Huxley’s pessimistic, yet already-fulfilled prophecy illustrates how both

Preventing a Manmade Apocalypse

2334 words - 9 pages This world is filled with constant warfare and the threat of safety. Nations all over the world are in constant conflict to protect their country and their rights. Weapons of mass destruction are at the epicenter of this constant threat against peace and life. The presence of weapons of mass destruction is a serious threat to the world and daily life, requires much concern, and needs to be addressed because of the imminent threat of massive

Biological Weapoms

652 words - 3 pages 1BurkeAlex BurkeMrs. DennisBiology 1 Honors Period 22/10/14Biological Weapons: Life used to KillThe word "war" brings an image to mind of uniformed soldiers of one country fighting soldiers from another. However, this way of war has forever changed. In modern times, war is often not fought by individuals on a battlefield, rather with weapons of mass destruction. One terrible example of these modern weapons is biological weapons which are harmful

Similar Essays

Chemical Weapons: Weapons Of Mass Destruction

652 words - 3 pages Chemical weapons, devices used for the sole purpose of hurting or killing humans, are widely considered one of the four types of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Chemical weapons are devices that spread a certain toxic chemical to incapacitate people. The two most dangerous kinds of chemical weapons are nerve agents and vesicant, or blister, agents. Types There five kinds of chemical agents. Lethal, Incapacitating agents, Riot control gases

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Are Bad

2261 words - 9 pages Should Weapons of Mass Destruction be stopped from being created because of the harm that they do or continue to be created for their use in protecting society? This question continues to bother American’s daily. Weapons of Mass Destruction are weapons that are used to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release of toxic or poisonous chemicals. It’s also a weapon that is used to release radiation or radioactivity at a level

Weapons Of Mass Destruction And Risk Galore

1338 words - 6 pages Weapons of mass destruction, as classified by the FBI, are any destructive devices, chemical or biological agents used with the intention of causing death or injury on a large scale. These weapons have been used in history, but most are banned to due to the extent of destruction caused. The atom bomb, probably the most well-known of these weapons were used sparingly but caused massive damage in the few areas affected. Chemical weapons, agents

Technological Developments On Weapons Of Mass Destruction

1003 words - 4 pages Greeks - not to mention their enemies the Trojans."Even the rulers of ancient India used any means necessary in the Arthashastra, the Brahman military strategist advised the use of poison.The Hittites back in 1500 BC used plague victims to the land of the enemies.The expression Weapons of Mass Destruction originally came from Robert Whealey, in the London Times in 1937 describing a German air force attack in Spain, on the town of Guernica and killing