This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Weapons Of Mass Destruction: Problems Or Solutions?

1610 words - 7 pages

Throughout history people have searched high and low for weapons to turn the tides of war. With modern technology we have reached a point that at the push of a button we could destroy our entire planet. The question now is, are the weapons needed for protection, or should they be destroyed in an effort to save the world from potential destruction? There are no right answers, only the loss of power or the loss of humanity. Which should we choose? We must all learn the dangers of weapons of mass destruction to decide which side to stand up for.
Government and Military strength has always decided which countries are the best in the world. Now with drones, the development of lasers, and nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, every modern organization is a credible threat. Our way of life is balancing on a gymnast's beam. A big enough push could topple us over the edge.
Nuclear power is a huge topic and definitely a two sided coin. On one side we have an opportunity of durable sustainable energy. It’s got a lot of risk, but also high reward. With proper waste management, nuclear energy has very low greenhouse gas emissions and relatively low operating costs. Nuclear Energy could be the future as illustrated by the image below, made in 2010 (Nuclear Power and Nuclear Weapons Worldwide).
The words in the image are unreadable. The large tower structures are made of tiny squares and each one represents one nuclear warhead, each color a different type owned by that country. Red are strategic warheads, blue are tactical, and white are non-operational. What is really important are the power plants located all over Europe. They are embracing new technology and attempting to improve their country with nuclear power.

On the other side of that coin we have extremely destructive nuclear weapons. There have only been two instances in history where these weapons were used with intent to harm. In World War II, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The effect was devastating and widespread, as illustrated in the graphic below (Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki).

The explosion wiped out 90 percent of the city and immediately killed 80,000 people.Within 24 hours, the survivors started getting symptoms of radiation poisoning including the flu, nausea and vomiting, headaches, fatigue, fever, red patches, peeling skin, and sometimes blistering. Tens of thousands more would later die of more lethal doses of radiation exposure (Nuclear Radiation). Three days later, a second B-29 dropped another A-bomb on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 people (Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Below are images of replicas of the “Little Boy” bomb left (environmental encyclopedia) and the “Fat Man” bomb right (Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki).

The “Little Boy” bomb was a more than 9,000-pound uranium-235 bomb that caused a blast equal to 12-15,000 tons of TNT, destroying five square miles of the city. The “Fat Man”...

Find Another Essay On Weapons of Mass Destruction: Problems or Solutions?

Technological Developments on Weapons of Mass Destruction

1003 words - 4 pages used for non-peaceful purposes and whose effects can cause large numbers of casualties and/or large-scale material damage.] And their delivery means constitutes a threat to international security and is a matter of concern to NATO".Produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation StudiesWMD = NW + BW + CW:-The most widely used definition of "weapons of mass destruction" in official U.S. documents is "nuclear, chemical, and biological

Chemical and Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction

1536 words - 7 pages law does not address these issues well enough. International law should be advanced to restrict BWs research programs done in the name of science. CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY Even after the first nuclear weapon was used by the United States in 1945 and the world watched its mass damage on both human being and environment, there have been serious arms race of nuclear weapons and various nuclear experiments by many

Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism

2283 words - 9 pages The whole world is just waiting for the one country, whether it is China, Russia, or North Korea, to set off a nuclear missile that would start a nuclear war and that would only end when there are few survivors left. However, maybe there is another way that a war could have an extreme number of casualties on every continent. The United States Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism believes that

This is about weapons of mass destruction including anthrax etc

1496 words - 6 pages Weapons of Mass DestructionChemical and Biological Warfare, use of harmful or deadly chemical or biological agents as weapons of war. These agents can kill many people and are considered weapons of mass destruction. Chemical weapons are made up of poisonous chemical compounds, whereas biological weapons are living microorganisms. Toxin weapons contain poisonous chemical products of living organisms and are sometimes classified separately

Disarment, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Outer Space: Mongolia´s Stand

1504 words - 7 pages According to the text, Weapons of Mass Destruction: Mongolia Hosts Bi-Lateral Proliferation Security Initiative Workshop and Table Top Exercise, the government of Mongolia took steps to prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) when they signed a bi-lateral Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) with the United States in 2007. Under the agreement, if a vessel registered to Mongolia or the United States is

Nuclear Energy: Substitution for Oil or a Possible Source of Mass Destruction

2333 words - 9 pages all propositions and to grab an attention. The expanding of the nuclear industry seems to be the most offered. This type of energy is considered very efficient, productive, and much cheaper than other types. However, the possibility of nuclear energy becoming the source of mass destruction instead of a substitution for oil should make the world look at the problem much closer and to think twice.Nuclear radiation was discovered more than hundred

The Huxley Vision: Weapons of Mass Distraction

961 words - 4 pages Humanity has always been fascinated by books which provide us with an apocalyptic view of the future. The destruction of a nation; the fall of our government—or in Huxley’s vision, its rise to power in formidable ways. As Huxley puts it, “the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance…[and humanity] would be reduced to passivity and egoism.” In contemporary America, Huxley’s pessimistic, yet already-fulfilled prophecy illustrates how both

Gruinard Island: Weapon of Mass Destruction

1260 words - 5 pages Gruinard Island is just one metaphoric piece of debris left over from the fallout and effects of Germany during World War 2 (WW2). This is just another testimony to the underappreciated fear of the invisible killer, the quiet storm and the science of the dragon’s breath also know as Weapons of Mass Destruction. This example is played out on the island of Gruinard merely a proving ground in fear of Germany’s biological program. Gruinard Island

Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the Automobile

3811 words - 15 pages Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the Automobile Mitigation, to the dismay of some, has become publicly synonymous with notions of preservation and conservation. Mitigation is neither the ‘preservation’ nor is it the ‘conservation’ of habitat. Mitigation is the creation of new habitat, or the guarding of an existing habitat to "make up" for the destruction of similar habitat somewhere else. It was the infamous environmental buzz

Life Problems An Assessment of possible solutions to certain problems

755 words - 4 pages words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends”. This means that after all we go through; our friends are still a huge impact in our lives. One of the biggest problems that an average teenager goes through is when their ‘best friend’ starts thinking that they’re too good for their friend or that they have more important people in their life; but you can deal with this in three different way; (1) ignore our friends actions and what there are

Television: Means Of Communication Or Destruction

885 words - 4 pages its true or not. How many people actually know that the "˜Article 5' of the NATO Constitution states that all US media, especially television, is supposed to be controlled by the US Military during war? Even news channels, no matter how big their reputation is, cannot help but favor their national government in their newscasts. Doesn't this tell us that all the news we have been watching has been filtered according to the wishes of the "˜

Similar Essays

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Essay

795 words - 4 pages Weapons Of Mass Destruction Weapons of mass destruction are the most powerful weapons ever created. Weapons of mass destruction are a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread annihilation. But according to United States law it also fits in many other weapons in to an extremely broad description of weapons. Nuclear weapons are a major crisis in today’s world as seen in the cold war can cause tensions to rise

Chemical Weapons: Weapons Of Mass Destruction

652 words - 3 pages Chemical weapons, devices used for the sole purpose of hurting or killing humans, are widely considered one of the four types of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Chemical weapons are devices that spread a certain toxic chemical to incapacitate people. The two most dangerous kinds of chemical weapons are nerve agents and vesicant, or blister, agents. Types There five kinds of chemical agents. Lethal, Incapacitating agents, Riot control gases

Weapons Of Mass Destruction And Risk Galore

1338 words - 6 pages Weapons of mass destruction, as classified by the FBI, are any destructive devices, chemical or biological agents used with the intention of causing death or injury on a large scale. These weapons have been used in history, but most are banned to due to the extent of destruction caused. The atom bomb, probably the most well-known of these weapons were used sparingly but caused massive damage in the few areas affected. Chemical weapons, agents

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Are Bad

2261 words - 9 pages Should Weapons of Mass Destruction be stopped from being created because of the harm that they do or continue to be created for their use in protecting society? This question continues to bother American’s daily. Weapons of Mass Destruction are weapons that are used to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release of toxic or poisonous chemicals. It’s also a weapon that is used to release radiation or radioactivity at a level