1. Gross, Grant. “House Rejects ‘Net neutrality’, Passes Telecom Reform Bill” Network World 23.23 (2006): 10.
AUTHOR Grant Gross.
DATE June 12
PUBLICATION Network World
LOCATION Framingham, MA
PUBLISHER Network World Inc.
PAGE NUMBERS 10
The House of Representatives has defeated a provision to require U.S. broadband providers to offer the same speed of service to competitors that's available to partners, a major defeat to a coalition of online companies and consumer groups.
"It is a shame that the House turned its back on the open essence of the Internet," Gigi Sohn, president of consumer rights group Public Knowledge, said in an e-mail."Instead, the House ... voted to allow the telephone and cable companies to discriminate by controlling the content that will flow over the network."
The Senate is debating its own broadband and telecom reform bill, but the current version doesn't include a 'Net neutrality requirement. Lawmakers have introduced four stand-alone 'Net neutrality bills, but the defeat in the House could mean the issue is dead until 2007.
2. Steinert-Threlkeld, Tom. “Both Call Time Out on ‘Net Neutrality’”. Multicahnnel News 27.26
AUTHOR Tom Steinert-Threlkeld
DATE June 26
PUBLICATION Multicahnnel News
LOCATION New York
PUBLISHER Reed Business Information
PAGE NUMBERS 22
Somehow, the Web not only survived, but thrived. The ability of Web sites to make money
produced a lot of failures in the dot.com rush. But it also produced lasting, powerhouse
brands. Most notably eBay, Google and Yahoo.
Now, these Internet giants want to freeze the commercial Internet in place.
They're fearful that the two main providers of Internet access, telephone and cable companies, will block access to sites that somehow compete with services they also offer online.
The real issue behind network neutrality is cost-shifting. The Internet giants that grew large on the basis of charging sponsors fees (Yahoo, Google) or users for handling transactions (eBay) don't want someone else to find a new revenue stream that, to them, becomes a new expense stream.
It's hard to escape the feeling that this is not an altruistic fight for keeping the grounds fertile for the "next" Google to emerge. But to keep present business models intact.
3. Searcy, Dionne; Schatz, Amy. “Not So Neutral”. Wall Street Journal 14 June 2006, Eastern
AUTHOR(s) Searcy, Dionne; Schatz, Amy
DATE Jun 14
PUBLICATION Wall Street Journal (Eastern Ed.)
LOCATION Princeton, New Jersey
PUBLISHER Dow Jones
PAGE NUMBERS B1-B2
People on both sides of the issue -- but mostly those who favor Net...