Welfare Capitalism Essay

1815 words - 7 pages

Welfare Capitalism. Well & Fair for Everyone.What extent of government regulation allows the citizens of the country the maximum amount of liberty? How much should the government intervene to protect the consumer? These are questions that every society must answer when developing their economic system. And for each question there are multiple answers. Some believe that little to no regulation is necessary, that the market place has natural laws of its own. Others disagree, saying that it is the government's duty to protect the individual from the evils of the free market. Both solutions have definite attributes. The first answer describes a system of capitalism, or lassiez-faire. Adam Smith, the philosopher credited with the development of this ideology, argued that the actions of each individual, motivated by self-interest, would work together for the good of society. Smith said that in order for this to work, the marketplace had to be competitive. If the government were to implement regulations, it would counteract the natural forces of the market place and cause unfair restrictions. In theory this form of capitalism is highly productive, but in practice is seems that it does not benefit all, as Smith predicted. Under this type of economic system, it is often the worker who falls victim to circumstances such as exploitation and poverty. Lassiez-faire permits the infringement upon an individual's liberty by other citizens. Although Adam Smith would describe these situations as part of the natural business cycle, modern society has reached a point where such abuses are no longer tolerable. It is at this time that the government must step in, and provide regulations that protect the individual. Once the government begins intervening though, it is easy to become overzealous and assume total regulatory control. Such an idea is called central planning, when the government controls the entire economy. Karl Marx was among the first to fully develop this idea. Marx argued that a country's industries should be nationalized, eliminating private property, competition, and the profit motive. With these gone, Marx said that the citizens would be free from exploitation and greed and would therefore be more content than ever before. Thus, the individual would be protected from the evils of capitalism. Again, in theory this may be effective, but in practice does not create the freedom that Marx desired. When the government determines income distribution and chooses employment, workers may become unmotivated, and their productivity will therefore decline. Since everything is for the good of the state, citizens are forced to conform and individual freedoms are restricted. Central planning creates the infringement upon an individual's liberties by the government. It is now obvious that government must step back from the economy. It seems that Marx misinterpreted human nature, and in doing so his entire philosophy crumbled. It can be seen then, that neither of...

Find Another Essay On Welfare Capitalism

Citizenship ans Capitalism are inevitably opposed to one another

978 words - 4 pages Capitalism and Citizenship are without doubt a incompatible. Citizenship endeavors to establish equalities within our society but in contrast capitalism does the complete opposite, causing divide and creates inequalities within our society. Citizenship can be defined as " a status which is bestowed on those who are full members of a community" (Marshall 1983). Citizens are said to, according to Marshall(1983), be equal in all respects

Class Conflict in Canada Essay

2550 words - 10 pages problem in Canada is that the capitalist system has led to a dismantling of the welfare state. This is why Canadian governments must focus on the effects of capitalism and work harder on saving Canada's social programs, rather than on trying to develop further capitalist policies. They have to focus on soothing the worst effects of class conflict. This is proving increasingly difficult because of economic globalization."Marxist and Radical

The Welfare System

1999 words - 8 pages of the volume he proposed “would only increase government spending and abuse of welfare dollars” (Issitt). Many people believe that welfare is the best way to eliminate poverty for four main reasons. First, they believe that the welfare system “does not substantially alter the distribution of power within American capitalism.” Second, they believe a social welfare system is necessary to ensure “the health and hope of its people” are not

Capitalism

1433 words - 6 pages , the rule of capitalism is that every trade occurs by mutual consent and to mutual advantage. Socialism or any other system that sacrifices the individual to the society is a system of virtual slavery. Furthermore, mixed systems, such as today’s regulatory and welfare state, merely unleash the same evils on a smaller scale. Only capitalism is true to the moral ideals stated in the Declaration of Independence: the individual’s right

America's Semi-Welfare State

1851 words - 7 pages collections. The outcomes of this reform appear to be bleak for many Americans who reside below the poverty line. How does a wealthy country like America have such weak welfare system? Drawing upon Katz, I argue that the development of the semi-welfare state is a result of the state taking measures to ensure that the people do not perceive relief as a right and to avoid exploiting the shortfalls of capitalism in addressing unemployment and poverty

Capitalism and Social Darwinism

1395 words - 6 pages selection from Darwin’s theories and applied them to society. Spencer argued that government intervention in the form of welfare, public education, and universal healthcare would only help the weakest humans survive thus undermining the entire human race and justifying Capitalism. Society began to see a moral worth in money, and the rich became better than the poor. The greatness of a society was equated with the individual success of its members

The Powerful Message of Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged

1339 words - 5 pages - clearly illustrate how an anti-capitalist economy can literally enslave its people "In the name of general welfare" (Rand Atlas Shrugged 505).          The right to life is the most important freedom an individual can have, and capitalism is the only system that is consistent with this right. "Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life

Untitled

873 words - 3 pages SOCIALISM VERUSES CAPITALISM Socialism is defined as a philosophical, political,and economic theory that land, transport and chief industries, natural resources, should be owned and mangaed by the state or public bodies, and wealth equally distributed. In a utopian socialist society, there is no unemployment, no poverty, no difference in wealth, status or power. In practice, however, it frequently leads to political control, censorship, limited

A 1500 word review on New Labour's New Deal policy, taking into account past and present welfare ideologies

1405 words - 6 pages employment; but by giving people the skills employers are seeking ensures 'Capitalism' survives. The government also benefits because a healthy employment would mean more money is being spent by people and this helps in stabilizing and strengthening the economy Ensuring that Capitalism survives has always been at the top of the agenda for the New Right welfare reforms.In conclusion the reconstruction of the welfare state is an attempt both to cut

The Future and Nature of Capitalism Viewed in a More Communist Light

2811 words - 11 pages with minimal government interference. The opposite of capitalism would be communism, where in the property owner is the state, and the focal point being social welfare enhancement. A mixed economy embraces the two and balances between the extremes. Many countries across the globe have adopted a mixed economy as it reduces the losses suffered by the countries that practice the extremes. Capitalism has been known to be the responsible entity for

Welfare Ideologies

2215 words - 9 pages explaining the function of the welfare state. They would deem the welfare state as a form of control when looking at it from a capital logic perspective. to understand this definition you have to go back to traditional marxism whereby their is a conflict within the classes such as the bourguisa and the proltariat because of capitalism. In order to accumilate capital there has to be some control over the working class by the owners of production

Similar Essays

Capitalism Essay

1141 words - 5 pages Capitalism is the name given to the economic system that incorporates free enterprise and a market system by Karl Marx, the founder of communism. By the textbook definition, capitalism is an economic system in which private individuals and business firms carry on the production and the exchange of goods and services through a complex network of prices and markets. (Heilbroner1 13-15) Capitalism is a philosophy that originated in Europe, where it

My Views On: Liberals Vs. Conservatives

993 words - 4 pages , neo-liberal economists, politically manifested as Neo-Cons (Neo-Conservatives), who came in the 70s to reflect a "change in the thinking" of the main ruling class elements at that time, saw the opportunity to, and are now set about changing the John Kenneth Galbraith "Welfare State" model of capitalism that was the outcome of the great post WW2 "liberal compromise" within capitalism. The reasons for this change of heart are many, but primarily

Socialism Versus Capitalism In The Jungle By Upton Sinclair

1662 words - 7 pages well as overtime laws. Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and Welfare are all socialist ideals that have infiltrated our capitalist society. Our uneven tax scale and universal healthcare for children are other examples. With this blend of capitalism with socialist ideals, the working class can be taken care of, but not at the expense of losing America's capitalist identity. In other countries socialism or communism has blended with

Rolling Back The Australian Welfare State

2323 words - 9 pages obligation, this is clearly evident in the commonwealth "work for the dole" programs .Macintyre also argues that the shift to individual responsibility and mutual obligation is caused by the rise of "stakeholder capitalism" which is described as individual rights matched against reciprocation of responsibility . Thus social participation and membership in a community implies individual mutual obligation.ACOSS suggests that the Australian welfare