When it comes to the topic of success, most experts, scholars, and researchers will readily agree that the term success can have various meanings and associations, ultimately depending on the individual themselves. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of what determines success. Whereas some are convinced that superiority complex, insecurity, and impulse control determine success, others maintain that success is determined by much more than that. One example would be in the article “ What Drives Success” illustrated by Amy Chua and Jed Rubenfeld, where they emphasize that “The Triple Package” is essential in determining success. Another point of view would be in his book, “Outliers,” where Malcolm Gladwell writes “It’s because of the contributions of lots of different people and lots of different circumstances, an that means we, as a society, have more control about who succeeds- and how many of us succeed.” (8;Reading Group Guide) is what composes long-term success. I have always believed that success was derived from an individual’s determination, culture, or just pure luck.
In their recent opinion piece, an excerpt from The New York Times, Chua and Rubenfeld have offered harsh critiques as to what is required in order for a person to acquire success. For example, they frequently state that the three traits needed are superiority complex, insecurity, and impulse control. The first trait is superiority complex, which Chua and Rubenfeld define as “a deep-seated belief in their exceptionality. The second appears to be the opposite- insecurity, a feeling that you or what you’ve done is not good enough”(3). The third is impulse control, which can be defined as the ability to prioritize when faced with tempting life decisions. In conclusion, this article urges us to believe success may not be attained without having “The Triple Package.”
In Gladwell’s study of success, he found that some people are fortuitous enough to experience latent advantages, unimaginable opportunities, and cultural legacy. Gladwell supports his claims by exposing to us a few examples of real life stories where his theory is proven to be true. For example, he shows us how his theory produces hockey stars, software engineering billionaires, and math geniuses, and he comes up with a brief for extensive reorganization of hierarchies and institutions that will give people who do not have those advantages and opportunities and equal chance at achieving success. Nevertheless, both followers and critics of Malcolm Gladwell will probably suggest otherwise and argue that success can be determined by a countless number of different ways and under a wide spread variety of disparate circumstances.
Although Amy Chua and Jed Rubenfeld’ “ Triple Package” idea might seem trivial, it is in fact crucial in terms of today’s concern over the question, what makes one person more successful than another. “Apart from the Chinese, US society is obsessed with self-esteem”,...