The art of convincing and persuading is highly subjective. The process of either coercion or blandishment is determined by different factors that vary depending on the individuals that are being addressed. Scientific theories are pragmatic presuppositions, suppositions that deal with things sensibly and realistically in a way that is based on practical rather than theoretical considerations. When we break down a fact, there are a series of specific elements that make it up, and appeal to different categories of individuals, thus making this fact believable and convincing for certain people, and not for others. So basically, just like the distinctions between truth and false; what may be convincing for me, may not necessarily be convincing for others. When taking in consideration the knowledge issue that theories in the human sciences and natural sciences have something that makes them convincing, one must agree to accept that theories are, again, subjective according to perception, emotion and reason; the different ways of knowing used by humans.
When speaking about human sciences, one refers to the investigation of human life and activities via a phenomenological methodology, a psychological approach to subject matters, that acknowledges the validity of both sensory and psychological experiences. As for the natural sciences, they involve the study of the physical world and its phenomena, so the natural world. “The term "natural science" is used to distinguish the subject matter from the social sciences, which apply the scientific method to study human behavior and social patterns.” Included in the natural sciences are the three subjects: Biology, Chemistry and Physics.
A theory is a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. In small talk, a theory is a hypothesis that ideally should explain why x happens when y occurs. Even from its basic definition a theory is something that is not written in stone or definite, but is something that can probably be proven wrong or differently with further knowledge. If theories are so idealistic and hypothetical, why do they convince most people so easily? Many would probably argue that because the scientific method is a process that seems to have no gaps, and seems to prove every single step in showing how the outcome was brought about, there really shouldn’t be any reasons to not believe in the theories in both the natural and human sciences. However in today’s society we’ve seen that unless they obstacle religious or traditional affairs, many theories are constantly up for speculation. But then again, to what extent can we rely on the scientific method in the construction of accurate, consistent, and “convincing” theoretical data? How do we know as individuals and societies, that despite their status, and their authority, scientists’ theories are true or not?
“The natural sciences reflect an intensive...