Terrorism response, like any issue concerning domestic politics and international affairs, can be faced analyzing either causes or effects. Terrorists are usually motivated by political beliefs. Even if terrorists can take advantage of other particular situations such as economic difficulties and religious beliefs, the main purposes are always political. That being said, the right response to terrorism is prevention. Solving the problem at the root cause is achievable through stable political regimes and open and functioning democracies. As long as terrorists do not need to resort to violence because they have other means to make their voices heard, they do not represent a threat anymore. Since this process might be quite long lasting, an effective strategy to counter attack terrorism has to be ready to react to any tragic event. Deterrence could nullify terrorists’ interests as well as they could be discouraged by the guarantee of a severe punishment.
Torture is one of the most tremendous techniques that some countries have adopted, explicitly claiming that it is essential to guarantee national security. On the contrary, it does not assure successful results, while inflicting such unbearable sufferance. Besides, states have been abusing of their power to spy upon citizens. Honestly, such powerful entities like states are totally allowed to make use of their authority when leading to evident benefits, whereas any abuse has to be strongly condemned and punished.
Torture has been used for many centuries worldwide, and today it is still supported by many philosophers and politicians. Any serious analysis of torture has to take into account both emotional and rational aspects. Supporters of torture, who know this dichotomy very well, usually use it to support their arguments. It is undisputable that either watching terrific videos about torture’s procedures or just thinking about painful manners arouses negative feelings as well as an impulsive reaction to stop it. Even A. Dershowitz, professor of law at Harvard University, talks about emotionality and rationality. He proposes to legalize and regulate the use of torture to avoid any further abuse caused by uncontrolled actions. Stating that torture is allowed for the benefit of the whole population, in some extreme situations, it is much less hypocritical as well as successful to address such a big problem like terrorism. In contrast, first, torture would not improve the international threat of terrorism; second, the arguments proposed by A. Dershowitz appear biased by public opinion feelings. Right after the 9/11 attack, foreign and defensive policies of the United States of America and public opinion have become very aggressive, openly addressing and trying to wipe out any menace. People, reacting instinctively to impulses without even thinking about them, easily accept inhuman methods for particular cases. Torture acceptance stems from a feeling of revenge rather rational choices; as a...