This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Which Was More Important As A Reason For The Failure Of The League Of Nations In The 1930's? The Absence Of The Usa Or Britain And France's Self Interest

574 words - 2 pages

The failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's was due to two main reasons.Firstly, the absence of the USA. The League of Nations was thought up by the American president Woodrow Wilson it was one of his 14 points. He had come up with the idea, the League was in a sense his child, yet he was allowed no part in it. The American congress had refused to become members of The League and this caused all sorts of problems. America had the biggest trade industry and without them agreeing to economic sanctions they would be no use at all. That is what happened when Mussolini invaded Abyssinia, the League imposed sanctions but America continued to trade with Italy, this meant that the sanctions were useless. Another sanction that did not work without the help of the USA was military sanctions. Britain and France's armies had both been weakened by the war and the rest of the league was relying on them to provide the troops. If America had been part of the League, they could have produced lots of troops for the army and the military sanctions would be more effective. Another thing is that the USA is a very powerful and rich country, the moral condemnation would have been more effective if the USA had been part of the League.Secondly Britain and France put their own interests in front of the interests of the League. They made secret pacts with other countries behind the league's back. In 1935 - during the crisis with Mussolini, the British and French Foreign Ministers, tried to make a pact with Mussolini. It was named the Hoare Laval pact and it aimed to give Mussolini two-thirds...

Find Another Essay On Which was more important as a reason for the failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's? The absence of the USA or Britain and France's self interest

The Failure of the League of Nations and the Outbreak of War in 1939

1401 words - 6 pages , Hitler was now confident of success. On 1 September the German army invaded Poland but to Hitler's surprise, France and Britain declared war on Germany. It would be difficult to determined whether the failure of the League of Nations was the most important reason that led to the outbreak of war in 1939 as there were many other important causes which are all linked together. For example, without the Treaty of Versailles there might not have been the League of Nations at all. Also there would not have been as much resentment towards the League.

Was The League Of The Nations A Stupid Idea?

1545 words - 7 pages people, thus making the League of Nations an ultimate failure.It is a true fact that the League gained its social success in one way. Working conditions improved greatly through the International Labor Organization, people's health and diseases were taken more seriously. However, ultimately, we may state that the League was a failure due to the stupid ideas it had, such as establishing the organization without the help of America which also meant

To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920's?

646 words - 3 pages Greek invaded Bulgaria as a reply to the murdering of Greek people. The League interfered and Greece became angry about their decision, reminding them of the incident between Italy and Greece in 1923, where Italy attacked them and Greece had to pay Italy for that and apologize. Those three incidents in the 1920's made the League a successful organization.An action which showed the success of the League of Nations was the establishment of

How successful was the league of nations in the 1920's? This essay analyses the problems and difficulties of the first attempt of a world security organization

743 words - 3 pages How successful was the league in the 1920's?The League of Nations main aim was in: "stopping wars, improving people's lives and jobs, in encouraging disarmament and in enforcing the decisions made in the peace Treaty of Versailles."If we consider the above statement to judge the successes of the league, we may say that when the League was called to settle a quarrel in the 1920s, it has always been quite successful.The most important successes

The League Of Nations - A Success In The 20’s, A Failure In The 30’s. How Far Do You Agree With This Satement?

534 words - 2 pages Italy seized the Greek island of Corfu.During the 1930's the League of Nations was not as successful in keeping peace. It's failures in peace keeping included- In 1931 the "˜Japan and Manchurian Crisis' when Japan attacked the Chinese province fo Manchuria. The League did little apart from criticising, which japan disliked and decided to leave the League in 1933. Then in 1934 a year after Hitler gained control of Germany they also left the

The Failure of the League of Nations to Keep Peace in the Nineteen-Thirties

2934 words - 12 pages government that generated fear in Western Europe. Such a country could not be allowed to take its place in the League. Three of the strongest nations were not present in the league. The absence of the USA was hard on the rest of the league because it did not have access to the prestige, influence, wealth or military power of the United States. It was forced to rely on Britain and France, who had both been weakened by the First

Failure of the League of Nations in the Inter-War Period

1201 words - 5 pages termination of alliance system. Originally, the League "offered to the world as much world-government as the world can stand." Nevertheless, from the beginning, the formation of the League was foreshadowing another war, because it had many flaws that made the League fail in its duty. Some of the reasons why it failed are the absence of the U.S.A., the negligence of Britain and France, and the failure to keep Collective Security in effect.U.S

Why was the League of Nations unable to stop Japan taking over Manchuria in the 1930s?

1702 words - 7 pages taken. It was very hard to come to an agreement and this led to no substantial action such as trade sanctions to be taken against Japan. Even if the League had agreed to condemn Japan or use economic sanctions, they would both be ineffective without the USA, which was not part of the League. Japan did not care what the rest of the world thought of its actions and as long it maintained the USA as a trading partner, it could keep the war in Manchuria

Why has the UN been more successful than the League of Nations?

1512 words - 7 pages We can argue whether the most widely represented international organization, the United Nations (UN), provides true safety for all its member states. In my opinion, there is no clear answer. When we look into the past at the League of Nations (LN), the UN’s predecessor, what can we find? It was a multinational organization trying to maintain peace by all accessible kinds of sanctions, but it used armed intervention only in cases of crisis as the

"The United States was not really isolationist in the 1930's". Argue the case for or against this statement

3013 words - 12 pages so. The introduction of hire purchase was another factor which led to major problems when the Great Depression set in. Although America was the only nation to come out of World War One seemingly more affluent than any other participating nations, it did not last. The 1930's were a time when unemployment rose, wages decreased and the whole country felt it. This can be seen as one reason why America appeared to become isolated from global affairs

How did the Prohibition Change the United States of America (USA)? And why was it a failure?

1507 words - 6 pages corruption that grew with ... [prohibition] made ... [US people] lose their respect for the law and for the people who were supposed to enforce it." American (USA) society has never really recovered from the effects of Prohibition, it has never returned to the moral standards once held as a nation. On a whole the Prohibition was one of the greatest mistakes made in the USA during the 1920's. Overall the Prohibition was a failure that should not have been enforced at all, let alone in a decade [The Roaring Twenties] where rapid change was taking place on its own.

Similar Essays

Was The League Of Nations A Success Or A Failure?

3786 words - 15 pages helplessly watched it.Before 1920 there was no such thing as the League of Nations. So there fore starting it and running it the way it did was a huge success in its self. The league was successful in solving disputes between minor and less powerful countries in the 1920's. However, it was powerless in front of the major and powerful countries in the 1930's. The league was doomed to fail right from it creation. The League of Nations was not a league

The League Of Nations In The 1930's

890 words - 4 pages In the 1930's, there were two crises that happened in Manchuria and Abyssinia, which extremely embarrassed the League of Nations, and finally in the end, no more countries relied on the league it anymore. The crises were provocative to other countries and inevitable as Japan and Italy, they both were both in the league's security council and could have vetoed any action against them. In 1929, the Wall Street market crashed and countries

The League Of Nations Was A Success

551 words - 2 pages disarm and improve the working conditions for their people. They also did great work for refugees by sending 400,000 prisoners home. However a lot of people were housed in refugee camps and diseases quickly formed. The league tackled them and acted quickly to stamp out diseases such as smallpox, cholera and dysentery.The last thing the league promised to do was disarm countries. It failed. However countries like Britain France America and Italy

How Strong Was The League Of Nations?

616 words - 2 pages aspects.However there were many failure of League of Nations, too. For example, Corfu was a specific failure. This conflict was between Italy and Greece, and it was obvious that Italy should be blamed. But the League of Nations asked Greece to pay and apology to Italy, because Italy gave more money than Greece to the League. This shows that the League had not much power because they chose money instead of justice. So, League of Nations received bad reputation