Imagine waking up tomorrow and reading in the local paper that the government was giving tax breaks to minorities in order to prevent discrimination. Congress insists that the deductions will “help level the playing field” in American society, claiming that diversity is necessary in creating an ideal nation, but is this attempt to prevent disparities and racism not an act of inequality in itself? By putting this policy into place, the government is giving advantages to minorities without showing the same generosity to Caucasians of the same economic backgrounds. Protests would be taking place around the country as citizens argue that the plan violates their Constitutional right to equality. Yet this is exactly the type of scenario seen in universities across the country. Colleges use race as a large factor in admissions in order to create “optimal diversity” among the students. However, this attempt at variety often comes at the expense of white and Asian students. For these reasons, affirmative action policies in college admissions should be eliminated in the United States.
Affirmative action policies were created to help level the playing field in American society. Supporters claim that these plans eliminate economic and social disparities to minorities, yet in doing so, they’ve only created more inequalities. Whites and Asians in poverty receive little to none of the opportunities provided to minorities of the same economic background (Messerli). The burden of equity has been placed upon those who were not fortunate enough to meet a certain school’s idea of “diversity” (Andre, Velasquez, and Mazur). The sole reason for a college’s selectivity is to determine whether or not a student has the credentials to attend that school. Therefore, it should be based only on merit, not hereditary traits (Messerli).
The University of Notre Dame’s point system for determining acceptance is simple: the higher the score, the more likely an acceptance. Unfortunately, race can also be a defining factor in the process. Applicants belonging to a minority received more than double the points than whites and Asians with the same credentials (Messerli).
Moreover, the United States Constitution itself gives all citizens equal rights. Amendment XIV is a prime example of this:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States…are citizens of the United States…. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States…nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction to the equal protection of the laws.” (U.S. Constitution)
In recent years, the severity of this issue has begun to come to light. The Supreme Court case of Grutter v. Bollinger in 2003 illustrates this. According to Barbara Grutter, a white woman with a 3.8 GPA and 161 LSAT score, The University of Michigan Law School denied her acceptance because of their use of race as a “predominant factor.” Seeing the injustice in this, Grutter took her...