Why Did Chamberlain's Policies For Appeasement Change From 1938 1939?

873 words - 3 pages

Britain and France chose the path of appeasement in hopes that this would satisfy Hitler and not drag Europe into another world war. Appeasement came from the desire to make amends and prevent war at all costs. Appeasement seemed to be working for small problems but when applied to choices like the fate of a country, appeasement caused more problems than it solved. Events in Europe and Britain between 1989-1939 pressured Chamberlain into abandoning his policies for appeasement.Events in Europe pressured Chamberlain to abandon appeasement. On September 28th 1938, Chamberlain, Mussolini, Daladier and Hitler came together to sign the Munich Agreement which handed Sudetenland over into German hands. The Munich Agreement was the turning point for British opinions about Hitler and Chamberlain. On August 21st 1939, Hitler tried to make a deal with Great Britain. He said that if they allowed him to take Danzig and all the colonies that use to belong to Germany, they would defend the British Empire. The next day, Hitler invaded Poland. It became obvious that Hitler was not someone to be trusted. Chamberlain commented on Hitler's invasion of Czechoslovakia as "a shock to the confidence". Just as things couldn't get any worse, something shocking happened. Mortal enemies, Stalin and Hitler, signed the Nazi-Soviet Non-aggression pact. The two countries agreed to not go to war with one another for ten years, divide Poland in half and Hitler even offered Stalin the Baltic States. Great Britain declared war on Germany on September 3rd 1939, marking the official beginning of World War II. With each event and the one following it, it became clear that war was unavoidable. It showed appeasement was not working and the only way to solve anything was through military force. Up until 1939, Britain found the easy way out of all of their problems (through appeasement)as was the case when Mussolini conquered Albania on April 13th 1939, UK did nothing. But as Hitler became an increasingly menacing problem, Europe looked the Britain and France to solve it. Britain was pressured to act.Events in Britain also pressured Chamberlain into abandoning appeasement. Many felt that the surrender of Czechoslovakia was disgraceful to Great Britain. Lord Duff, Lord Admiral of the Royal Navy, resigned from the British parliament because of the Munich agreement. The Munich Agreement marked the end of Chamberlain's policies for appeasement. Neville Chamberlain met with Hitler on September of 1938 to sign the Munich Agreement where Hitler promised that Sudetenland was his last demand. The next week, Chamberlain was called back where Hitler told him that he was going to invade Czechoslovakia. Stalin...

Find Another Essay On Why did Chamberlain's policies for appeasement change from 1938-1939?

Why did Britain not go to war in March 1938?

1982 words - 8 pages appeasement soon became clear. Hitler broke the Munich Agreement in March 1939 and seized the rest of Czechoslovakia. He thereby added Czechoslovakia's armed forces and industries to Germany's military might. In the months before World War II began, Germany's preparations for war moved ahead faster than did the military build-up of Britain and France.


1253 words - 5 pages Historians have suggested many reasons for the outbreak of the Second World War, yet there is no single reason why the war broke out.One reason why the war broke out in 1929 is that the Treaty of Versailles solved nothing. Because Germany suffered huge reparations from the First World War and the loss of land simply helped to justify Hitler and the aggression which he showed. The Treaty was unjust and unfair on Germany. They were also angry at

Choose what you believe to be the three (3) most convincing reasons why appeasement was the diplomatic option of choice in 1938.

1219 words - 5 pages of choice in 1938. Firstly, memories of the First World War contributed to the use of appeasement, many countries were still sufferring economically and socially from the war and did not want another war to begin anytime soon. The United Kingdom and especially France were extremely reluctant to fight due to the psychological trauma resulting from having witnessed the mass deaths of vast numbers of young people. For example, many British

How and Why did the Nazis Change Germany from 1933-1945

1054 words - 4 pages to the broadcasts because loud speakers were placed in the streets and in public bars. In the broadcasts speeches and ideas were repeated over and over again. Basically in Germany then there was propaganda everywhere and because Hitler had complete power there was from essaybank.co.uk no controlling or competing with it. Propaganda was an every day event for ordinary Germans and so the things the propaganda said also became everyday occurrences

Why Did Anti-semitic Policy Develop As It Did Between 1933and 1939?

1484 words - 6 pages Why Did Nazi Anti-Semitic Policy Develop As It Did, Between 1933-1939? Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933. Strongly influenced by "˜Social Darwinism', as a teenager, he implored anti-Semitic ideas into his governing policies. The degree of intensity of the anti-Jewish policies varied as Hitler's presidency developed. When he came to power, he realised the struggle, in an economical sense, Germany was enduring. So, with his key priority

Did the people benefit from Nazi economic policies?

869 words - 3 pages better.It seemed on the surface that the German workforce benefited from Nazi policies because the unemployment levels fell quickly after 1933. The truth behind this was that the unemployment levels declined in Britain and the USA as the world came out of the depression. German workers were not actually better off than they would have been under a non-Nazi government. Unemployment in Germany did drop to a lower level than in Britain. This was explained

The Change of Nazis' Treatment of the Jews From 1939-45

2076 words - 8 pages an already isolated race in Europe. There were also other reasons for the change in treatment towards the Jews after 1939 and one of these reasons was the growth of the SS and their rise to power. The SS who began as Hitler's personal bodyguards when the Nazi party first took power, from the year 1939 onwards grew at an alarming rate. Soon they were larger than the German army. Some even referred to the SS as a "state

How and why did the methods used by the PLO to fight for the Palestinian cause change over time?

1574 words - 6 pages In this investigation, I will be researching the methods used by the PLO, how they changed over time, and the reasons for this change. I will use the internet and books from the library to study various primary and secondary sources, in order to gain different points of view and to therefore answer the question.* In 1965 the PLO carried out its first armed raid on Israel; it planted bombs in Israeli government buildings and mined roads.* Until

What events, from 1937 to 1939, led to the outbreak of war in 1939, and how did war spread between 1937 and 1941?

969 words - 4 pages part of Germany on 13 March 1938. This event led to the outbreak of war because Hitler blatantly defied the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations did nothing to stop him. This, in turn, increased Hitler's confidence and encouraged him to continue his aggressive actions and breaking the terms of the Treaty of Versailles.The Munich Crisis led to the outbreak of war in 1939. In 1938 Hitler demanded the Sudetenland, although this was forbidden

Why did the United States Withdraw From the Vietnam War?

1510 words - 6 pages Why did the United States Withdraw From the Vietnam War? The United States withdrew from the Vietnam War for several reasons. The Army had to fight in unfamiliar territory, was lacking in moral, were not prepared for the conditions, could not shut down the Ho Chi Minh Trail, and were untrained to respond to guerilla warfare. This combination of disadvantages and the loss of public support led to the United States withdrawing from Vietnam. The

Why did tension increase in Europe from 1900 to 1014?

1035 words - 4 pages Why did tension increase in Europe from 1900 to 1014?There are various factors that amplified the tensions in Europe from 1900 to 1914. A few of the major factors were International rivalry, the arms race, colonialism and the Crisis's of Morocco and Bosnia. These factors, alongside numerous others contributed to fuelling the First World War.International rivalry was, debatably, the biggest factor that caused the First World War. As the European

Similar Essays

Q: Why On Earth Did Chamberlain's Policy Change From 1938 To 1939?

1145 words - 5 pages Chamberlain changed his policy from appeasement in early 1938 to fighting a war by 1939. During the time, many events happened in Europe and England. Hitler was expending his power, which didn't allow Chamberlain to continue his appeasement. This drove many people in England against Chamberlain's idea. The expending of fascist and the objection of his own country cut down the policy of appeasement. Chamberlain had to drop his idea and prepare

Why Did The Nazis Treatment Of The Jews Change From 1939 45?

679 words - 3 pages On January 20, 1942 fifteen high ranking Nazi party and German government leaders gathered for an important meeting. They met in a wealthy section of Berlin to discuss a topic only known as 'The Final Solution'. The Nazis used this vague term to hide their policy of mass murder from the rest of the world; they were to remove the Jews from German society.In 1939 Germany invaded Poland and 2 million Polish Jews came under Nazi Control.After the

The Change In British Policies And Attitude Toward Africa Between 1938 And 1948

2226 words - 9 pages part of the earth they live”[1]. From then onwards the Colonial Office policies in Africa took a new direction, as Africans were seen less as being determinedly barbarous and tribal, and more with potential for being cultivated into a mind-set where political independence can be possible. Speaking in June 1939, Macdonald proclaims that local populations were everywhere “producing more and more of their own doctors and

How Far Did Stalin’s Social Policies Change The Lives Of Children And Women In The Years To 1945?

1428 words - 6 pages more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas." - Stalin These quotes show us that he sees education as a way of defeating his opponents and by indoctrinating the students to Bolshevik ideas then he is less likely to have enemies within his own country. From the educational reforms we can see that these made a huge change in the lives of Russian Children though it did leave them prone to Bolshevik