Why Did King Charles I Resort To Personal Rule In 1629

4213 words - 17 pages

Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

The Personal Rule came about when King Charles I dissolved parliament
in 1629. It was symbolic of a time when the King felt that any joint
governing of the country was impossible. Right from the start of
Charles' reign, relations had been poor with Parliament. But the time
leading up to the start of the Personal Rule, or the "Eleven Year
Tyranny" as it is sometimes referred, marked a low point. So for what
reasons did Charles embark on the Personal Rule, and whose fault was
it? These issues will be discussed in the following paragraphs.

The broad overall reason for the collapse of relations between
Parliament and the King is the conflict of the ancient feudal system
under the King against the system that Parliament was trying to impose
of increased parliamentary power and increasingly joint rule. The will
of Parliament for change represented a new era. Although no-one would
dare go against the established belief that the King was above
everyone else in the Kingdom, the extent to which they believed in
Royal Prerogative, the Divine Right of Kings and other such feudal
principles was becoming less clear cut. Parliament realised that the
King could make mistakes and that some Kings were a lot better than
others. Charles, on the other hand, believed in Royal Prerogative and
the Divine Right of Kings with such a reverence not seen for
centuries. With such conflicting beliefs of the two parties concerned,
it is not difficult to see why these were such troublesome times for
the Monarchy and the development of the English Constitution. This
period also marks a very important, but often overlooked, development
in the way the King was regarded by Parliament. Around the time that
the Personal Rule started, Parliament for the first time conceded that
the King could be at fault and it was not just his misguiding advisors
that were to blame.

An obvious reason why Parliament could not work with the King was
Charles' deep emotional problems. Although this is not the most
important reason, it is nevertheless an important one that cannot be
overlooked. Charles was a deeply insecure man. His insecurity had
roots in his childhood, where he was seen as the runt of the litter,
and very much outshone by his older brother Henry. Perhaps his
hard-line approach of being unwilling to compromise or negotiate was
because he lacked the emotional intelligence and confidence to reason
with people effectively. In reality, this was probably a culmination
of his strong belief in the Divine Right of Kings and his lack of
confidence. In his history of the period, the Earl of Clarendon cited
a major reason for Charles' personality problems at "not trusting
himself enough".

The King's speeches to Parliament lacked conviction, largely due to a

Find Another Essay On Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629

Modern History Oral - Personal Account Of The Holocaust - I did an account of a Jewish woman sharing her experiences with a history class.

1644 words - 7 pages antisemitic caricatures of Jews exhibited on the front page. In public, we were only allowed to sit on yellow benches designated for Jews and we were all treated as second class citizens. I didn’t understand why any of this was happening; what had we done wrong? I could only wonder how long this discrimination could have continued and prayed that it would all end soon so that Greta could grow up happily and go to school with the rest of the

Why Parliament diskliked Charles I Essay

540 words - 2 pages The English Parliament disliked Charles I for four reasons: his rudeness to the members, several unconstitutional acts, terrible affinity for wasting money, and forcing the Laudian reforms upon them.Charles I was often extremely disrespectful of Parliament, especially when he selfishly became angry. For example, in 1626, Parliament ruled that the king could not collect the tonnage and poundage tax, which he desperately wanted. Upon hearing this

Why did World War I Break Out in 1914?

745 words - 3 pages In this essay I am going to be explaining the causes of WWI. There are four main causes of WWI. They are Nationalism, Imperialism, Militarism an Alliances. The assignation of Archduke Ferdinand was only the 'spark' which set off the 'barrel of gunpowder'. The four causes had created so much tension in Europe that it only needed one event to trigger war. I will break down the four causes in to long-term, medium-term and short-term. The first long

Why did World War I break out in 1914?

604 words - 2 pages In this essay I'm going to be explaining the causes of WWI. There are four main causes of WWI. They are Nationalism, Imperialism, Militarism and Alliances. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was only the "spark" which set off the "barrel of gunpowder". The four causes had created so much tension in Europe that it only needed one event to trigger the war. I will break down the four causes into long term, medium term and short term. The first

Personal Essay on Why I Want a Career in Pharmacy

619 words - 3 pages Your Personal Essay should address why you selected pharmacy as a career and how the Doctor of Pharmacy degree relates to your immediate and long-term professional goals. Describe how your personal, educational, and professional background will help you achieve your goals. The personal essay is an important part of your application for admission and provides you with an opportunity for you to clearly and effectively express your ideas. My

Why hamlet is not fit to rule

944 words - 4 pages Why Hamlet Is Not Fit To Rule Actions judged without empathy implore bias at the deepest root. Seldom, life experience equals the paradox of participant observation with the magnitude and malice of Shakespeare's Hamlet. Although Hamlet tragically suffers misfortune from the volition of others, his character measures in deed and thought. From the scant background on Hamlet's youth to the words of Hamlet himself, ample evidence shows Hamlet

Why did World War I break out and who was to blame?

1738 words - 7 pages plans were a key factor in a concoction of several factors that went toward the breaking out of World War I. This was a long term cause that made war much more likely. Even though that officially the leaders did not want to use the plans because it was just 'precaution', the leaders put time and effort into them and they wanted to see them in action.Britain and Germany used to have a very strong connection with each other. The King of Britain, George

Why did it take so long for the nations of Europe to defeat Napoleon I?

772 words - 3 pages Napoleon had been working hard in building a powerful and great empire ever since the beginning of his rule as Emperor in 1804. Since before that time he had managed to expand French territory into Italy, he had annexed the Austrian Netherlands, The German States, the Batavian Republic, later on he annexed parts of Egypt, and Parts of Spain. It was because of this hugely successful foreign policy and France's revolutionary background that the

Why did Britain not go to war in March 1938?

1982 words - 8 pages Why did Britain not go to war in March 1938Many historians have traced the causes of World War II to problems left unsolved by World War I (1914-1918). World War I and the treaties that ended it also created new political and economic problems. Forceful leaders in several countries took advantage of these problems to seize power. The desire of dictators in Germany, Italy, and Japan to conquer additional territory brought them into conflict with

Why Did People React So Strongly to Witchcraft in History?

1809 words - 7 pages Why Did People React So Strongly to Witchcraft in History? Throughout history, people’s reactions to witchcraft have started mass panic, hysteria, disturbing witch trials, and countless executions and hangings. Witchcraft was once and still can be a very controversial topic, as it challenges other’s religions and beliefs and is against Christianity. Back when the Church was the main source of authority and guidance, reactions to witchcraft

Why did tension increase in Europe from 1900 to 1014?

1035 words - 4 pages Why did tension increase in Europe from 1900 to 1014?There are various factors that amplified the tensions in Europe from 1900 to 1914. A few of the major factors were International rivalry, the arms race, colonialism and the Crisis's of Morocco and Bosnia. These factors, alongside numerous others contributed to fuelling the First World War.International rivalry was, debatably, the biggest factor that caused the First World War. As the European

Similar Essays

How Strong Was The Opposition To Personal Rule In England Between 1629 1640

952 words - 4 pages Opposition to Charles’ personal rule between 1629 and 1640 was aimed at him from a number of different angles. The first of these is Religion. Charles came under attack from, in simple terms, the Protestants and the Catholics. He had this attack on him for many different reasons. He was resented by the Catholics, because he was a protestant. To be more precise, he was an Arminian, which was a sector from the protestant side of

1637 As The Highpoint Of The Personal Rule Of Charles I

1369 words - 5 pages 1637 as the Highpoint of the Personal Rule of Charles I Charles' personal rule started in 1629 after the second session of his third Parliament ended in arguments and disagreements between King and Parliament about the methods (tonnage and poundage) Charles used to generate personal income. Charles adjourned Parliament during this session and Parliament declared three resolutions that would force Charles into personal

Execution Of King Charles I Essay

714 words - 3 pages King Charles I left us with some of the most intriguing questions of his period. In January 1649 Charles I was put on trial and found guilty of being a tyrant, a traitor, a murderer and a public enemy of England. He was sentenced to death and was executed on the 9th of February 1649. It has subsequently been debated whether or not this harsh sentence was justifiable. This sentence was most likely an unfair decision as there was no rule that

Charles I: The Death Of A King And The Birth Of A Superpower

2158 words - 9 pages necessary to maintain a world superpower. During Charles I’s reign, he aimed at creating an absolutist rule of the English government, claiming Divine Right above all other men. Within his reign, Parliament was rarely called upon unless the king was in a situation of debt, but with each mistake of Charles, it became increasingly apparent another party should be making the decisions. When Oliver Cromwell’s regime killed Charles I, Cromwell himself took