Why Did "The Big Three" Disagree Each Other So Strongly During The Treaty Of Versailles?

507 words - 3 pages

The first dispute occurred in January 1919. A meeting was held at Versailles in France by the leaders of each country as to decide how to punish the Germans. The leaders who attended the meeting were Lloyd George, prime minister of England, Georges Clemenceau, prime minister of France, and Woodrow Wilson, president of America. They were also known as "The Big Three" However they disagreed with each other's ideas. They each wanted something, which benefits themselves.Firstly, as the French were probably one of the worst victims of WWI. The prime minister of France wanted the German to be deeply punished. A request to have Germany demilitarized from the border of Germany to France and a ...view middle of the document...

Second, the German naval threat was gone and the British colonies aren't threatened anymore. England's punishments for Britain aren't as harsh as the French. A restriction on German's army and pay a large amount for reparation was all they wanted. This was mainly due to the fact that Germany was one of their big trading partners. If Germany was bankrupt, England won't benefit at all. Lloyd George declared if the treaty listened to Clemenceau, Germans would revenge in 25 years.Thirdly, the Americans had a total different idea. Woodrow Wilson believed that the factors, which caused WWI, weren't all because of Germany. France and England should also be blamed for the cause of the war. Wilson considered that the Europeans' diplomatic was too self-determined, they ignores the public's wishes or opinions. He also believed that the problems could only be solved if there is the relations between the countries were improved and a new self determined diplomatic government was being could be created through all the European countries.In conclusions, the main courses of the conflict during the "The Big Three" meeting were: firstly, the diplomatic relationships between the three countries, where the Americans hated the British, England and France also hated each other, they were only uniting before cause had to face a tough enemy. Secondly, the French wanted Germans to pay for more than what they caused, where England just wanted Germany to pay for a certain amount since they got exactly what wanted. Thirdly America had a totally different opinion to both of the other countries in the treaty, which was probably the major cause of the conflict.

Find Another Essay On Why did "The Big Three" disagree each other so strongly during the treaty of Versailles?

How and Why the Treaty of Versailles Differed from Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points

1609 words - 6 pages one of the reasons why the Treaty of Versailles differed by quite a bit compared to Wilson's Points was because they felt that what Wilson wanted was out of sympathy for the other countries, as he didn't understand what it felt like to be one of those countries at war or in battle, as much. Whilst Wilson looked as if he was trying to sympathise with the other countries, the Allies were looking for revenge on Germany to make them pay back for what they had cost them, their country, their people and their world.

Why Did The Allies Disagree Over The Treatment Of Germany In 1919?

545 words - 3 pages French were not a big exporter of goods to Germany, so they did not see the economic implications to the German's. They would be afraid of a Russian Communist revolution in Germany as the revolution could easily spread from Germany to the country next to it.The United Kingdom was suspicious of Germany's decision to build a large navy, as they feared that they could be under attack. After the end of World War One, the British were keen to remove this

Why did the number of people migrating to Britain increase during the three decades following the Second World War?

989 words - 4 pages given reasons of what helped make the population of Britain increase rapidly during the three decades after the second world war, it is clear that the main causes were that the people needed employment and the people felt they were being encouraged to come to Britain. Also, Britain's reputation was extremely good, and some people tried to escape from the dangers of their home-land. This seems to be a main cause as most people came to Britain for that very reason.

How The Southern and New England colonies were so different from each Other

821 words - 3 pages "The Southern and New England colonies were so different from each other, that there was not one feature shared by these two groups of colonies." This statement is true because of mainly two reasons. While cultural forces contributed to the differences of both regions, the distinction of economies played the key role in driving the quote true. These two characteristics made each of these regions unique in its own way.Economy was the major

Why did the ALP lose the election of December 13th 1975 so badly?

2165 words - 9 pages When the Australian Labor Party came to power in November 1972, it was following almost a quarter of a century of Liberal government, whose policies were becoming increasingly outdated in comparison to the forward thinking promises of ALP leader, Gough Whitlam. The following three years were a program of social reform, though the leadership period suffered under the effects of a world economy turned sour and through a perceived mismanagement of

Was Hitler alone the cause of world war two?- essay title summerised answer: only partly, due to other reasons such as the Treaty of Versailles, The Great Depression and more

547 words - 2 pages While there is much debate in the historical community about the actual causes of World War II, about who was responsible, what might have prevented it, or what exactly went wrong, there is a strong desire to understand it. Could it be that only one person was the cause of such an enormous event? This essay will explain why it was not Hitler alone that caused the 2nd World War.One of the major causes of the War was the Treaty of Versailles. The

Why did it take so long for the nations of Europe to defeat Napoleon I?

772 words - 3 pages . Despite these defeats, Napoleon was still a very powerful man, and did not show any more signs of weakening; he still held a firm grip on his conquered lands and single-handedly governed the states and led the army.In January 1814 France was being attacked on all it's frontiers, but the allies made it clear that they were fighting to defeat Napoleon, not France. Napoleon was basically being attacked because in 1813 he had refused to sign the treaty

Why did the revolutions of 1848 achieve so little in Germany?

692 words - 3 pages Parliament. The Germanic peoples had always been lead by one single person a king or a Prince. They therefore did not have much faith in democracy and also one person would be able to pass laws without opposition whereas the parliament couldn't. The Germanic people needed strong leadership like that of Hitler or Fredrick Barbarossa. That is why I think the 1848 revolution achieved so little; it was the mentality of the Germanic people that failed the liberals.

How and why did the role of british government increase during the industrial revolution?

1135 words - 5 pages economy and to prevent such disasters as the South-Sea Bubble. Thus government involvement in the economic policies of Britain definitely extended its role further.The changing nature of the workforce, as a consequence of the rise of the factory system, resulted in the emergence of Britain's middleclass. This middleclass, prior to 1832, did not have the franchise, despite being the owners and financiers of so large a portion of Britain's trade and

Why did African Americans increasingly turn to violent methods of protest during the 1950s to 1960s?

698 words - 3 pages Violent methods of protest were increasingly embraced by African Americans in the Civil Rights movement during the 1950s to 1960s because of frustration caused by the time consuming and ineffectiveness of peaceful non-violence. After the initial hype of non-violence during the 1955 Montgomery Bus Boycotts, non-violence eventually lost its influence as it was not yielding the results the African-Americans had hoped for. In addition to this, non

What are the principal philosophies of the Liberal Party? Why had the Liberal Party been so electorally successful over the years? Why did it lose the last election?

3452 words - 14 pages Page PAGE 12 of NUMPAGES 12 Australian Studies Major EssayCormac GriffinCandidate Number: A1177407What are the principal philosophies of the Liberal Party? Why had the Liberal Party been so electorally successful over the years? Why did it lose the last election?The Liberal Party of Australia was founded in 1944. Subsequently, it has become the most electorally successful of all Australian political parties: it has held political power at the

Similar Essays

Why Did The Big Three After Wwi Disagree So Strongly?

997 words - 4 pages their own revenge. Because of his farsightedness, George was able to see what Wilson and Clemenceau could not.The main reason why the three countries' leaders had such disagreed so strongly during the conference was the effect Germany had on them. Because Germany had caused so much distress for France, it was only natural that they would have a very heated response towards Germany and wish to see them severely punished. On the other hand, Wilson

Why Germany Was So Discontented With The Treaty Of Versailles

2494 words - 10 pages Why Germany was So Discontented with The Treaty of Versailles After the WWI, Germany had trouble accepting the unexpected defeat and was anxiously awaiting a peace treaty. It wasn’t until 1919 that finally The Treaty of Versailles was formed and signed, however the Germans were left discontented with it. There were many accumulative reasons why the Germans disliked the treaty; one being the first fact of how

Did The Treaty Of Versailles Accomplish Peace?

1708 words - 7 pages needed. Besides this, Germany was not the first country to mobilize or attack. They were blamed for the actions of other countries and for any country these verdicts are disgraceful and unfair. They would fight for what is right. This source is the exact words of the Treaty, these words show that the Big 3 and many other countries were very biased towards Germany, they didn't care if it was the culprit or not, they just hated the Germans so they "saw

Why Did People React So Strongly To Witchcraft In History?

1809 words - 7 pages Why Did People React So Strongly to Witchcraft in History? Throughout history, people’s reactions to witchcraft have started mass panic, hysteria, disturbing witch trials, and countless executions and hangings. Witchcraft was once and still can be a very controversial topic, as it challenges other’s religions and beliefs and is against Christianity. Back when the Church was the main source of authority and guidance, reactions to witchcraft