This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

“Why Did The ‘Reconstruction’ Of The South Prove To Be Such An All Around Failure?”

817 words - 4 pages

In theory, Lincoln’s plan of Reconstruction seemed an efficient way to redeem the South of its devastation. He was willing to give them a break and do far more for the former Confederates than they deserved. Reconstruction proved to be a failure because Southerners regressive and resistant to change. Because of conflicting viewpoints between Andrew Johnson and congress, the false promises of the Reconstruction Amendments and South’s reign of terror on African Americans these efforts were dismantled.
A mistake contributing to reconstruction’s failure was Johnson straying from Lincoln’s original Ten Percent Plan which was as follows: “a southern state could be readmitted into the Union once 10 percent of its voters swore an oath of allegiance to the Union. Voters could then elect delegates to draft revised state constitutions and establish new state governments. All southerners except for high-ranking Confederate army officers and government officials would be granted a full pardon.” After Lincoln’s assassination Johnson pardoned all Southerners including government officials. He went as far as pardoning Alexander Stephens, Vice President of the Confederate States of America. He was then elected to the United States Senate by Georgia. Because of Johnson’s terrible decision making Congress went on to pass the Wade-Davis Bill. Basically pushing the Ten Percent Plan to the Fifty Percent Plan, it proposed that now fifty percent of a state had to take the oath in order to be readmitted as a state. It was a battle between Johnson and the Radical Republicans in Congress.
During Reconstruction the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments were passed, collectively known as the Reconstruction Amendments. The thirteenth amendment abolished slavery, the fourteenth protected the rights of former slaves and the fifteenth gave everyone the right to vote regardless of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. In theory these amendments should have launched America in the right direction and help reconstruction be successful but the South continuously got around each of the laws. These were limited successes because although they freed the slaves the laws protecting them were no specific and far too flexible. Slavery was abolished but it was nearly impossible to attain a job with a respectable and honest wage. Certain rights were protected but that did not mean they were rights that had to be equal and up to par with white rights, just enough to go unnoticed as being unjust. Blacks were finally able to vote and voice their opinions...

Find Another Essay On “Why did the ‘Reconstruction’ of the South prove to be such an all-around failure?”

Did we really land on the moon . Here Are ome explantion to why nasa csnt prove the landed on the moon

888 words - 4 pages that NASA put an eleven-foot by four-foot vehicle inside a five-foot by four-foot space. NASA claimed that the vehicle was disassembled and reassembled on the moon and than put back n the spacecraft.Here are some reasons why we didn't land on the moon and NASA didn't have a response to them. Neil Armstrong set up the camera 30 ft away from the LEM but there was no footprints leading to the camera. In another photo of Aldrin there is a glare on his

Why did the US fail to save South Vietnam from Communism?

1235 words - 5 pages guerrilla warfare and committed many atrocities against the Vietnamese people. Ho Chi Minh (the leader of the North Vietnamese) on the other hand was a person supported by a lot of the Vietnamese (including many in the South), because he gave the people what they wanted, which were to rid the country of foreign occupiers once an for all, and to give the normal person land.The biggest plausible reason the US's failure to save communism, was because the

Why Did A.J.P Taylor’s Analysis of the Origins of the Second World War Cause Such Controversy Among Historians?

1043 words - 5 pages Why did A.J.P Taylor’s analysis of the origins of the Second World War cause such controversy among historians? It was broadly considered that the Second World War began in 1939 because of Hitler’s plan for world domination; many historians validated this view at the time until A.J.P. Taylor published his book ‘Origins of the Second World War’ in 1961. A. J. P Taylor was the first historian to examine the war with a completely open mind

Why did the South lose the Civil War and how did the North win?

579 words - 2 pages they were fighting on their own soil and the long coastline makes it almost impossible for a blockade to take place and even if one happened it would be very difficult to do. The South's largest disadvantage was that the southern slaves which made up an enormous amount of the population were clearly no help they also had little industry and factory production.It is said the longer the war went on, the better the North's chances of winning. Clearly this was true and as the war grew longer and longer the South was eventually doomed.

How did the Prohibition Change the United States of America (USA)? And why was it a failure?

1507 words - 6 pages people to break the law and increased the amount of liquor that was consumed nationwide. Overall this law was a failure because a law can not be enforced on a democratic society with out the support of a majority. The effect of this mistake (prohibition) lingered on American (USA) society for many years to follow.Before the Prohibition the people of the United States of America had high moral standards, were more conservative and in many ways

WHY DID HISTORIANS OF EUROPE DOUBT THAT AFRICA HAD REAL HISTORY AND HOW HAVE SCHOLARS OF AFRICA ATTEMPETED TO PROVE THEM WRONG

970 words - 4 pages and shape the actual concept of racism. With him and others justifiers it was declared that Africa doesn’t have her own history and all required history came just after the contact with Europeans. The African population didn’t know how to develop the country and take care of themselves, and that’s why they needed a leader (more specifically England and France ). The best conclusion to be drawn with it is that the European superiority simply

Why did the "Bloody Code" come into such force in the 18th century, and then was largely abolished in the early part of the 19th century?

1957 words - 8 pages answer was usually brought to the prisoner by an Ordinary (or chaplain)."If all else failed, a petition for mercy would often be answered". "Pardons played an important role, for acts of mercy helped create the mental structure of paternalism...mercy was part of the currency of patronage".If all chances for a pardon were impossible, another way out of an execution, though ending with the same result, is suicide. Like the indiscriminate use of the

Why did the French fail so often in military battles around the period of the French Revolution? A look at France's military tactics from the 1400s-1800s

848 words - 3 pages The French are often criticized for their poor military record, often insulting the attitudes of the French people themselves. But why did the French really lose so often in combat? Their military tactics were horrendous, their armor was impractical, their formations were illogical, and their weapons were ineffective.The most important part of the battle, according to French officers, was having an effective defense. This all started with armor

Nixon vs. The United States of America. Explains all aspects of the case and the reasons why the Supreme court decided as they did

714 words - 3 pages political intelligence. Attempts by the White House to stop or frustrate the ensuing investigations ultimately failed when Nixon's own White House tape recordings revealed that the president and his assistants had engaged in an obstruction of justice.Following the arrest of the two co-plotters--G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt-- District Court Judge John J. Sirica was convinced that pertinent details had not been unveiled during the trial and

The Failure of Reconstruction

770 words - 3 pages and charge the whites around a penny. Last of all, there was the literacy test. For this one, voters had to answer a question in order to vote. Simple questions were given to the whites such as, "Can you write an "X"?" However, the blacks were given much harder questions like, "What was the most famous concerto of Tchaikovsky?" and, "How many symphonies did Beethoven write?" Since the blacks could not possibly know the answers to such questions

The Failure of Reconstruction

679 words - 3 pages Shannon, The original purpose of Reconstruction was to restore the buildings and the economy of the south the best they could, but without the immoral element of slavery. But, reconstruction under the Johnson Presidency was a failure for a few reasons: 1) Convict Leasing, 2) Sharecropping, 3) the Ku Klux Klan, 4) Segregation in schools, even in the North, 5) Carpetbaggers/Scalawags, 6) misleading statistics, and 7) racism. Convict Leasing

Similar Essays

Reasons Why The South Won Reconstruction

961 words - 4 pages in a Union victory. Even though the North won the war, they did a horrible job in trying to win the peace, or in other words, the Reconstruction era. Rather than eliminating slavery in the South, the Southerners had a new form of slavery, which was run by a new set of codes called "Black Codes”. With the help of President Johnson, the South continued their plantations, in essence becoming exactly what they were before the war. Overall, the South

Why Did Reconstruction Fail? Essay

1266 words - 6 pages Reconstruction is known as the period after the Civil war. The whole country was separated in two, people didn’t know what to do, the south was completely destroyed, and there were a lot of decisions to be made by the president. It lasted four years, and there was over half a million casualties between the union (North) and the confederate states (South). The north was declared the winner of the war after General Lee surrender in the Appomattox

Why Did The North And South Separate?

668 words - 3 pages .( Unit 11 Notes) The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a compromise that suspended the Missouri compromise and left it up to the voters to determine whether Nebraska and Kansas would be slave free states or not. (Carnes & Garraty pg, G-9) Even though Nebraska lay in the North where there was no slavery, there was a lot of pressure from the South to become a slave state. The South was afraid because it did not want to be surrounded by three slave free

Why Did Contemporaries Engage In Such Fierce Debate Over The Impact Of Eighteenth Century Enclosure?

3383 words - 14 pages Why did contemporaries engage in such fierce debate over the impact of enclosure in eighteenth century England?The eighteenth century carried a number of problems including inflation, the effects of the French wars, the growth of industry and the demand for more food and this compelled farmers to use all available land in a more productive manor. The main obstacle to improvements in agriculture was thought to be the open field system of farming