Why Did The Revolution Fail To Topple The Tsar In 1905, But Succeed In 1917?

1670 words - 7 pages

Why did the Revolution fail to topple the Tsar in 1905, but succeed in 1917?The Russian Revolution had a decisive impact on the history of the twentieth century. Its implications and influences went on to effect a huge area and last decades. True to the large impact that it had, it was a large event. It spanned years and included many various groups and individuals. When studying the Russian Revolution it is important to note that it came during a time of change in Russia. Over the forty years preceding 1905, and thirty years following 1917, the Russian Empire underwent huge transformations. This meant that though many events can be seen as part of the Revolution, much of them happened against different backdrops within the country.Nicholas II did not abdicate and was not dethroned in 1905. However the Revolution of February 1917 did remove him from his position. When asking why Nicholas II survived 1905 there are many factors to be examined. It is notable that at both times many conditions were extremely similar. Levels of dissatisfaction, large strikes and the country being geared towards a war time economy are all examples. But it is important to see the perhaps less noticeable factors and also the small differences which gave the two events such contrasting outcomes.The Autocracy, after suffering a humiliating defeat in the Russo-Japenese War, could have been dealt an even harsher blow if the peace terms it was faced with had been more severe than they transpired to be. However, the negotiations, presided over by the American president, Theodore Roosevelt in New Hampshire, were quite lenient on Russia. This allowed Nicholas to save face, pride and also security in his position. #In 1905, despite the atrocious conditions that workers in the agricultural and industrial sectors were suffering, there does seem to have been support, or general good-will towards the Tsar. It is often suggested that the people did not blame him, but those around him for the state of the country. Father Gapon, later one of the Revolution's most vigorous supporters wrote a letter to be delivered to the Tsar which contained the lines "Do not believe the ministers. They are cheating thee in reguard to the real state of affairs. The people believe in thee."# The people no doubt realised, after being fired upon at the Winter Palace, that their faith in the Tsar was ill founded.The same conditions did not exist in 1917. The people were under no illusion as to how the Tsar felt about them. During the Febuaury Revolution, strikers carried placards with slogans such as "Down with the autocracy" written on them. With no support from the masses Nicholas II had lost a key ally in his battle to remain in power.#Both the revolutions of 1905 and Febuary 1917 are often said to have been leaderless. It is true that in 1905 there were few, if any individuals willing to assume control of the masses and wrestle power from the autocracy. Many of the revolutionary leaders such as...

Find Another Essay On Why did the Revolution fail to topple the Tsar in 1905, but succeed in 1917?

Why did the 1905 Russian Revolution break out, and how significant was the 1905 Revolution in bringing about political change by 1912?

859 words - 3 pages than a hundred of the demonstrators. This caused the Russian view of the Tsar as their "Little Father" to be completely shattered and produced a great deal of unrest and sympathy strikes, leading to the 1905 Russian Revolution.One significant effect of the 1905 Revolution that brought about political change was the Tsar's response to the revolution. In order to appease those who would overthrow him, Nicholas II set up a Duma (Russian Parliament

How and why did the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the US entry in World War

1222 words - 5 pages involved but in general there were three main reasons why it ended the war and why it turned the course of the war; US entry in war generally made the war finish earlier, Germany isolation in war also made the war earlier and Russian Revolution made the turning point in the course of war.The first major reason that affected the end of war was US entry. But first we should think why US got involved in the war. There are two major points why the US

Tsar Nicholas 2nd's Survival of The 1905 Revolution

1506 words - 6 pages call. Even though the monarchy received a hard slap on this day, the tsar himself was in no immediate danger; the ignorance of the instigator, Father Gapon, ensured that he didn’t even know that the tsar was not occupying the Palace at this time. There is much debate as to whether or not the events of 1905 constituted a revolution at all. Leon Trotsky, a famous and influential revolutionary writer stated that it was

Why did Caesar fail and Augustus succeed in establishing autocracy in Rome?

2040 words - 8 pages Why did Caesar fail and Augustus succeed in establishing autocracy in Rome?Julius Caesar is arguably one of history's best generals. His reign ended only a few years after it began with his assassination, but Caesar's naïve nephew, Octavian, succeeded in establishing long and successful autocracy in Rome. However, this success may appear as a result of learning from Caesar's mistakes. A closer examination reveals Octavian as a shrewd

Why did the French fail so often in military battles around the period of the French Revolution? A look at France's military tactics from the 1400s-1800s.

848 words - 3 pages The French are often criticized for their poor military record, often insulting the attitudes of the French people themselves. But why did the French really lose so often in combat? Their military tactics were horrendous, their armor was impractical, their formations were illogical, and their weapons were ineffective.The most important part of the battle, according to French officers, was having an effective defense. This all started with armor

Why did the provisional government [of Russia before Communism and Lenin gained control post-WW1 after the fall of the Tsar fail?

1227 words - 5 pages Why did the Provisional Government fail?One of the main reasons that Russia's provisional government failed and why the Bolsheviks were able to gain power is the First World War. The war was a disaster for Russia- people were already very discontent at the failure of the war and the shortages it caused- it was a major cause of the March revolution to overthrow the Tsar. The war was already going badly when the June-July Russian offensive was a

To what extent did the Progressive reforms of 1901-1917 effectively address the problems created by the Industrial Revolution?

661 words - 3 pages Although the Progressive movement is usually seen as a great achievement in the history of American development, some feel that the Progressives failed to comply with the standards of equality and justice they had set out to create. The Progressive movement was instigated as a reaction to the political and corporate abuses created by the Industrial Revolution,. Religious groups, members of the press, and radical political groups had all been

Why was the Tsar overthrown in 1917?

619 words - 2 pages The Tsar abdicated in the year 1917. Three important problems which contributes to the over throw of the in the year 1917 are, first of all the Tsar made mistakes by taking personal charge of the army and the actions he took after he did. Secondly, World war one played a big part in his over throw and thirdly one of the Tsar's strengths was that he had support of the army so when the army abandoned him, he lost one of his strengths.In 1917 the

World War I : The Eastern Front - What are the specific objectives of the offensives? Who were the combatants? Did the offensives succeed or fail?

1185 words - 5 pages fail even more in the east. The Russians aimed to attack Germans while they were fighting France, and on the 10th of August, 1914, orders were set to the quickest advance against Germany, by attacking the left-behind forces in Prussia. The Germans expected the Russian armies to actually take 6 weeks to arrive, but within 10 days, already 4 armies were on the move, and that was when the Germans began to sweat, and caused panic among the German

Why couldn't the regime of Nicholas II reform itself in the years between 1905-1917?

2089 words - 8 pages seemed almost destined to fail. Consequently, "anger against incompetent and irresponsible conduct of public affairs boiled over in sharp criticism of the Tsar." This criticism can be seen clearly in March 1905, when Benckendorff wrote that Nicholas II was 'ridiculous', and that 'there is something absurd in any and every monarchy'. Such comments coming as they did from a senior military courtier of impeccably loyal and aristocratic origins show

Why did the Bolsheviks appeal to the people of Russia in 1917?

607 words - 2 pages The Bolsheviks appealed to the people of Russia in 1917 mainly because Russian society craved change. The tsar was now a part of the past and Russian society wanted to try something new. This is mainly why the Bolshevik party appealed to the people of Russia in 1917.The initial triumph of the Bolshevik Revolution at the end of October, 1917 did not mean that the entire population of Russia had been converted to Bolshevism. Leninwas aware of this

Similar Essays

Exploring Why The Tsar Abdicated After The 1917 Revolution But Not After The 1905 Revolution

2839 words - 11 pages Exploring Why the Tsar Abdicated after the 1917 Revolution but not after the 1905 Revolution Introduction: Before the 20th century Russia was still very much living in the medieval age with a Medieval standard of living. Before the mid 19th century, Russia’s peasants were subjects to a form of slavery and were known as “Serfs”. This from of slavery was abolished in 1861and peasants were aloud land for themselves – but

Why Did The Tsar Abdicate In 1917?

1030 words - 4 pages Why did the Tsar abdicate in 1917?The title 'Tsar' means a male monarch or emperor. Russia had always had a Tsar for 300 years; Nicholas II was the last .There is a number of reasons that led Nicholas abdicating in 1917.One of the main reasons that led the Tsar abdicating was failures of Wars. In 1904 Russia planned what was meant to be a surprise attack on Japan so it can stretch its empire, but ended up loosing which meant the tsar was

Russia Did The 1905 Revolution Fail?

699 words - 3 pages Q.Did the 1905 Revolution fail?The Revolution of 1905 did not work in getting rid of the Tsar that was in power at the time, however it was seen as being revolutionary, and the revolution did fail for many explicit reasons that will be explained.At the beginning of the twentieth century Russia was seething with unrest. The peasants and the urban working class were equally discontented, due to the frequent peasant uprisings and strikes.Discontent

Why Did The Revolution Of 1905 Occur?

1272 words - 5 pages , and though after the Fundamental Law the Czar merely a year later, which gave him the right to veto the existence of the Duma altogether, still proved to be one that planted the seeds of revolution and prepared the nation for the more thorough in 1917. The revolution was an inescapable accumulative force that came from a very diverse people, spread across a cross continental country, that had been denied just treatment for far too long. It showed and aspired future revolutionaries to point to it as an example of why violent revolution was the only way to completely alter a system of government.